Palabras clave
Ambiente de Trabajo
Carga de Trabajo
Enfermedade Profesionales.
Cómo citar
Copyright © | Todos los derechos reservados.
La revista posee los derechos de autor exclusivos para la publicación de este artículo en los términos de la ley brasileña 9610/98.
Reproducción parcial
El uso de partes de los textos, figuras y cuestionario del artículo es libre, siendo obligatoria la citación de los autores y revista.
Reproducción total
Está expresamente prohibido y debe ser autorizado por la revista.
Resumen
Objetivo: Analizar la información actual sobre las diferencias entre presentismo, workaholic, burnout y boreout en el contexto laboral. Revisíon bibliográfica: El mercado laboral actual es cada vez más complejo y en constante cambio, demandando competitividad, productividad y flexibilidad que son experimentadas subjetivamente por los trabajadores como sobrecarga y presión, dando lugar a una amplia gama de patologías relacionadas con la salud laboral. Así, se trata de un estudio cualitativo, con abordaje descriptivo de tipo informativo que partió de una revisión bibliográfica en la que se revisó el tema para responder a la pregunta orientadora: “¿qué sabemos hoy sobre los temas desde una perspectiva científica? ”. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de artículos científicos que abordaran el tema en las bases de datos Medline, Web of Sciense, Scopus y Lilacs. Consideraciones finales: La experiencia y vivencias en el lugar de trabajo pueden influir en el equilibrio del trabajador, es importante reconocer a la brevedad acciones o facilitadores para resolver la situación y contextos aún antes de que resulten en problemas y perjuicios graves.
Referencias
ABEKAH-NKRUMAH G e NKRUMAH J. Perceived work environment and patient-centered behavior: A study of selected district hospitals in the central region of Ghana. PloS one, 2021; 16(1): e0244726.
AGBAJE OS, et al. Workplace gender-based violence and associated factors among university women in Enugu, South-East Nigeria: an institutional-based cross-sectional study. BMC women's health, 2021; 21(1): 124.
ALSUFYANI AM, et al. Impact of work environment perceptions and communication satisfaction on the intention to quit: an empirical analysis of nurses in Saudi Arabia. PeerJ, 2021; 9: e10949.
BONSAKSEN T, et al. Are Demanding Job Situations Associated with Alcohol-Related Presenteeism? The WIRUS-Screening Study. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021; 18(11): 6169.
COOPER CL e MARSHALL J. Occupational sources of stress: A review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health. From stress to wellbeing, 2013; 1: 3-23.
HWANG WJ, et al. What Are the Experiences of Emotional Labor and Workplace Violence that Are More Harmful to Health in Korean Workforce? International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(21): 8019.
KAGAN I, et al. Personal initiative and work environment as predictors of job satisfaction among nurses: cross-sectional study. BMC nursing, 2021; 20(1): 87.
KANG S. Workaholism in Korea: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Differences. Frontiers in psychology. 2020; 11: 569744.
KIM N, et al. The Crossover Effects of Supervisors' Workaholism on Subordinates' Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Two Types of Job Demands and Emotional Exhaustion. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(21): 7742.
LOHAUS D, et al. Working While Ill Is Not Always Bad-Positive Effects of Presenteeism. Frontiers in psychology, 2021; 11: 620918.
MISIOLEK-MARÍN A, et al. Influence of Burnout and Feelings of Guilt on Depression and Health in Anesthesiologists. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(24): 9267.
MOLINA-HERNÁNDEZ J, et al. Work environment, job satisfaction and burnout among Spanish dentists: a cross-sectional study. BMC oral health, 2021; 21(1): 156.
NAKAHORI N, et al. Effect modification by workplace social capital on the association between depression and workplace and family stress: the Japanese civil servant study. BMC public health, 2021; 21(1): 726.
NEJATIAN M, et al. Investigating the status of marital burnout and related factors in married women referred to health centers. BMC women's health, 2021; 21(1): 25.
OATES WE. Confessions of a workaholic: The facts about work addiction. World Publishing Company, 1971.
POIRIER C, et al. Creation and Validation of the First French Scale for Measuring Bore-Out in the Workplace. Frontiers in psychology, 2021; 12: 697972.
RASOOL SF, et al. How Toxic Workplace Environment Effects the Employee Engagement: The Mediating Role of Organizational Support and Employee Wellbeing. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021; 18(5): 2294.
ROTHLIN P e WERDER PR. Die Boreout-Falle. Auflage, München, 2009.
RUIZ-PRADA M, et al. Occupational Stress and Catholic Priests: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Journal of religion and healt,; 2021: 1-64.
SHAN G, et al. Presenteeism in Nurses: Prevalence, Consequences, and Causes From the Perspectives of Nurses and Chief Nurses. Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021; 11: 584040.
SILVA-COSTA A, et al. Association between Presenteeism, Psychosocial Aspects of Work and Common Mental Disorders among Nursing Personnel. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(18): 6758.
STOCK RM. Is boreout a threat to frontline employees' innovative work behavior? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015; 32(4): 574-592.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases. Acessado em: 10 de setembro de 2022.
ZUTAVERN S e SEIFRIED J. Exploring Well-being at Work-An Interview Study on How IT Professionals Perceive Their Workplace. Frontiers in psychology, 2021; 12: 688219.