Palabras clave
Simulación de Paciente
Entrenamiento Simulado
Cómo citar
Copyright © | Todos los derechos reservados.
La revista posee los derechos de autor exclusivos para la publicación de este artículo en los términos de la ley brasileña 9610/98.
Reproducción parcial
El uso de partes de los textos, figuras y cuestionario del artículo es libre, siendo obligatoria la citación de los autores y revista.
Reproducción total
Está expresamente prohibido y debe ser autorizado por la revista.
Resumen
Objetivo: Sintetizar las evidencias científicas presentes en la literatura sobre el uso del método de debriefing plus-delta para la educación en enfermería basada en simulación. Métodos: Revisión integrativa realizada sobre fuentes de información de la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina; Institutos Nacionales de Salud; Scopus; índice acumulativo de literatura de enfermería y salud relacionada; Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud; Web de la Ciencia; Centro de Información de Recursos Educativos, con la ayuda de Rayyan y análisis a través de Análisis Temático. Resultados: Se identificaron 676 estudios y de estos cinco compusieron la muestra. Fueron creadas dos categorías, la primera titulada “Práctica del debriefing Plus-Delta” y la segunda “Beneficios del debriefing Plus-Delta para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en enfermería”. Consideraciones finales: Con base en una experiencia docente internacional, el debriefing plus-delta se ha realizado, generalmente, sin la asociación de otras técnicas de debriefing, impactando positivamente en el desarrollo del conocimiento y satisfacción de los educandos, a través de la descripción de los puntos positivos (plus) y los puntos a mejorar (delta) en el desempeño del alumno.
Referencias
BORTOLATO-MAJOR C, et al. Debriefing Evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2019; 72(3): 788-94.
CARVALHO APV, et al. Avaliação do risco de viés de ensaios clínicos randomizados pela ferramenta da colaboração Cochrane. Diagnóstico e Tratamento, 2013; 18(1): 38-44.
CHENG A, et al. Embracing informed learner self-assessment during debriefing: the art of plus-delta. Advances in Simulation, 2021; 6 (22).
DUSAJ TK. Five Fast Fixes: Debriefing. Clinical Simulation Nursing, 2014; 10(9): 485-6.
GHARIBI KA, et al. Effect of Repeated simulation experience on perceived self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 2021; 106: 105057.
HARDER N, et al. Psychological outcomes of debriefing healthcare providers who experience expected and unexpected patient death in clinical or simulation experiences: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2020; 29(3-4): 330-46.
JOHNSEN HM, et al. Developing a Serious Game for Nurse Education. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 2018; 44(1): 15-9.
KAINTH R. Dynamic Plus-Delta: an agile debriefing approach centred around variable participant, faculty and contextual factors. Advancing simulation practice, 2021; 6(35).
KLAIR MB. The mediated debrief of problem flights. In: DISMUKES RK e SMITH GM. Facilitation and Debriefing in Aviation Training and Operations. Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate; 2000.
LAVOIE P, et al. Debriefing Approaches for High-Fidelity Simulations and Outcomes Related to Clinical Judgment in Baccalaureate Nursing Students. Collegian, 2019; 26(5): 514-21.
LEE BO, et al. Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance. Nurse Education Practice, 2019; 41: 102646.
MACKENNA V, et al. Self-debriefing in healthcare simulation: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 2021; 102(104907).
MELNYK BM, FINEOUT-OVERHOLT E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. A guide to best practice. Philadelphia, 2005; 3 (24).
MEZA PK, et al. Changing the landscape of obstetric resident education in low- and middle-income countries using simulation-based training. Intern Journal of Gynaecology Obstetrics, 2021; 154 (1): 72-78.
MILTON K. Primary Care Trust. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Making sense of evidence. CASP. London: Oxford; 2002.
MINAYO MC. Sampling and saturation in qualitative research:consensuses and controversies. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, 2017; 5(7).
NASCIMENTO JSG, et al. Clinical simulation for nursing competence development in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: systematic review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 2020; 28: e3391.
NASCIMENTO JSG, et al. Debriefing: desenvolvimento e validação de um roteiro para simulação do suporte básico de vida. Cogitare Enfermagem, 2021; (26).
NIU Y, et al. Effectiveness of simulation debriefing methods in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 2021; 107.
OUZZANI M, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 2016; 5(1).
PAGE MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372(71).
RAO P. Introduction to debriefing. Update in Anaesthesia. 2022.
SANTOS CM, et al. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 2007; 15(3).
TYERMAN J, et al. A Systematic Review of Health Care Presimulation Preparation and Briefing Effectiveness. Clinical Simulation Nursing, 2019; 27(12).
URSI ES e GALVÃO CM. Perioperative prevention of skin injury: an integrative literature review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 2006; 14(1).
WEAVER A. The Effect of a Model Demonstration During Debriefing on Students’ Clinical Judgment, Selfconfidence, and Satisfaction During a Simulated Learning Experience. Clinical Simululation Nursing, 2015; 11(1): 20-26.
WHITTEMORE R e KNALF K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advance Nursing, 2005; 52(5): 546-553.
WILBANKS BA, et al. Comparison of Video-Facilitated Reflective Practice and Faculty-Led Debriefings. Clinical Simulation Nursing, 2020; 42: 1-7.
XIMENES NETO FRG. Educação em enfermagem no Brasil: avanços e riscos. Enfermagem em Foco, 2019; 10(6): 4-5.