Análise do Presenteísmo, workaholic, burnout e boreout no contexto do trabalho
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Analisar informações atuais sobre as diferenças entre o presenteísmo, workaholic, burnout e boreout no contexto do trabalho. Revisão bibliográfica: O mercado de trabalho atual está cada vez mais complexo e em constante mudanças, exigindo competitividade, produtividade e flexibilidade que são vivenciadas de forma subjetiva pelos funcionários como sobrecarga e pressão, dando origem a uma ampla gama de patologias relacionadas à saúde ocupacional. Trata-se assim, de um estudo qualitativo, com abordagem descritiva do tipo informativo que partiu de revisão de literatura na qual se revisou o tema de modo a responder à questão norteadora: “o que sabemos hoje sobre os temas sob a perspectiva científica?”. Realizou-se a buscativa bibliográfica de artigos científicos que abordassem o tema nas bases de dados Medline, Web of Sciense, Scopus e Lilacs. Considerações finais: A experiência e vivências no local de trabalho podem influenciar o equilíbrio do trabalhador, sendo importante reconhecer o mais breve possível ações ou facilitadores para resolver a situação e os contextos antes mesmo que resultem em sérios problemas e danos.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
2. AGBAJE OS, et al. Workplace gender-based violence and associated factors among university women in Enugu, South-East Nigeria: an institutional-based cross-sectional study. BMC women's health, 2021; 21(1): 124.
3. ALSUFYANI AM, et al. Impact of work environment perceptions and communication satisfaction on the intention to quit: an empirical analysis of nurses in Saudi Arabia. PeerJ, 2021; 9: e10949.
4. BONSAKSEN T, et al. Are Demanding Job Situations Associated with Alcohol-Related Presenteeism? The WIRUS-Screening Study. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021; 18(11): 6169.
5. COOPER CL e MARSHALL J. Occupational sources of stress: A review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health. From stress to wellbeing, 2013; 1: 3-23.
6. HWANG WJ, et al. What Are the Experiences of Emotional Labor and Workplace Violence that Are More Harmful to Health in Korean Workforce? International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(21): 8019.
7. KAGAN I, et al. Personal initiative and work environment as predictors of job satisfaction among nurses: cross-sectional study. BMC nursing, 2021; 20(1): 87.
8. KANG S. Workaholism in Korea: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Differences. Frontiers in psychology. 2020; 11: 569744.
9. KIM N, et al. The Crossover Effects of Supervisors' Workaholism on Subordinates' Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Two Types of Job Demands and Emotional Exhaustion. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(21): 7742.
10. LOHAUS D, et al. Working While Ill Is Not Always Bad-Positive Effects of Presenteeism. Frontiers in psychology, 2021; 11: 620918.
11. MISIOLEK-MARÍN A, et al. Influence of Burnout and Feelings of Guilt on Depression and Health in Anesthesiologists. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(24): 9267.
12. MOLINA-HERNÁNDEZ J, et al. Work environment, job satisfaction and burnout among Spanish dentists: a cross-sectional study. BMC oral health, 2021; 21(1): 156.
13. NAKAHORI N, et al. Effect modification by workplace social capital on the association between depression and workplace and family stress: the Japanese civil servant study. BMC public health, 2021; 21(1): 726.
14. NEJATIAN M, et al. Investigating the status of marital burnout and related factors in married women referred to health centers. BMC women's health, 2021; 21(1): 25.
15. OATES WE. Confessions of a workaholic: The facts about work addiction. World Publishing Company, 1971.
16. POIRIER C, et al. Creation and Validation of the First French Scale for Measuring Bore-Out in the Workplace. Frontiers in psychology, 2021; 12: 697972.
17. RASOOL SF, et al. How Toxic Workplace Environment Effects the Employee Engagement: The Mediating Role of Organizational Support and Employee Wellbeing. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021; 18(5): 2294.
18. ROTHLIN P e WERDER PR. Die Boreout-Falle. Auflage, München, 2009.
19. RUIZ-PRADA M, et al. Occupational Stress and Catholic Priests: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Journal of religion and healt,; 2021: 1-64.
20. SHAN G, et al. Presenteeism in Nurses: Prevalence, Consequences, and Causes From the Perspectives of Nurses and Chief Nurses. Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021; 11: 584040.
21. SILVA-COSTA A, et al. Association between Presenteeism, Psychosocial Aspects of Work and Common Mental Disorders among Nursing Personnel. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(18): 6758.
22. STOCK RM. Is boreout a threat to frontline employees' innovative work behavior? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015; 32(4): 574-592.
23. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases. Acessado em: 10 de setembro de 2022.
24. ZUTAVERN S e SEIFRIED J. Exploring Well-being at Work-An Interview Study on How IT Professionals Perceive Their Workplace. Frontiers in psychology, 2021; 12: 688219.