Envelhecimento ativo no contexto do trabalho: uma revisão de escopo
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
May 31, 2023
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Mapear as evidências disponíveis sobre o envelhecimento ativo no contexto do trabalho. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão de escopo sendo guiada pelas recomendações do Instituto Joanna Briggs e segundo o arcabouço metodológico proposto por Arksey e O’Malley. Resultados: Foram incluídos 19 artigos que mostraram que o envelhecimento ativo no contexto do trabalho perpassa por várias variáveis como: a estrutura do trabalho como a necessidade de intervenções e abordagens no local de trabalho; intuito de melhorar as condições para serem mais seguras; trabalhar a promoção da saúde ao longo da vida e do emprego; da importância das relações sociais e do aprendizado ao longo da vida; e ter empregos mais seguros. Considerações finais: Dentre os principais achados, ter uma mão de obra qualificada e mais experiente, além das inúmeras contribuições para as relações sociais frente à diversidade etária no ambiente ocupacional, temos um ganho significativo para a saúde de trabalhadores mais velhos, independente de qual área, setor ou local que se encontra.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
AquinoR. L. de, & MirandaF. J. S. (2023). Envelhecimento ativo no contexto do trabalho: uma revisão de escopo. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Científico, 44, e12871. https://doi.org/10.25248/reac.e12871.2023
Seção
Artigos
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Referências
1. ALVES G, et al. Precarização do trabalho em saúde mental. São Paulo: Praxis, 2018.
2. ARKSEY H e O'MALLEY L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 2005; 8(1): 19-32.
3. BAUER MW e GASKELL G. Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. 13. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2017.
4. BLOMÉ MW, et al. Attitudes towards elderly workers and perceptions of integrated age management practices. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2018: 1-14.
5. BOOTH A. The literature review: its role within research. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles: Sage, 2016.
6. BROWN M e McCOOL, B. Active aging: life design for health. Chicago: BookBaby, 2019.
7. COGIN J. Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012; 23(11): 2268-2294.
8. DEJOURS C. A loucura do trabalho: estudo de psicopatologia do trabalho. 6 ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2015.
9. EDGE CE, et al. Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus. Public health reviews, 2017; 38(1): 1-27.
10. GONG CH e HE X. Factors predicting voluntary and involuntary workforce transitions at mature ages: Evidence from HILDA in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019; 16(19): 3769.
11. GRANT MJ e BOOTH A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 2009; 26(2): 91-108.
12. HILLMAN DR. Understanding Multigenerational Work-Value Conflict Resolution. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health. 2014; 29(3): 240-257.
13. HOVBRANDT P, et al. Prerequisites and driving forces behind an extended working life among older workers, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2017; 26:3, 171-183.
14. HOVBRANDT P, et al. Psychosocial Working Conditions and Social Participation. A 10-Year Follow-Up of Senior Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021; 18(17): 9154.
15. HUSIC JB, et al. Aging at work: A review of recent trends and future directions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(20): 7659.
16. HWANG E, et al. The virtual environment in communication of age-friendly design. Technologies for active aging. Boston: Springer, 2013.
17. INSTITUTE TJB. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2015 edition/Supplemen; 2015.
18. KIM J e HA J. The Meaning of Work and Self-Management Experiences among Elderly Workers with Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8(4): 471.
19. KLUGAR M, et al. The personal active aging strategies of older adults in Europe: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2016; 14(5): 193-257.
20. MARQUES LP, et al. Quality of life and its association with work, the Internet, participation in groups and physical activity among the elderly from the EpiFloripa survey, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2016; 32: e00143615.
21. MATEO RODRÍGUEZ I, et al. Elaboración de criterios e indicadores para desarrollar y evaluar programas de envejecimiento saludable en los lugares de trabajo. Revista espanola de salud publica, 2015; 89(5): 497-514.
22. MELNYK BM e FINEOUT-OVERHOLT E, editores. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Nova York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
23. MUNN Z, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 2018; 18(1): 1-7.
24. NILSSON K. Managers’ attitudes to their older employees: A cross-sectional study. Work, 2018; 59(1): 49-58.
25. NILSSON K. When is work a cause of early retirement and are there any effective organizational measures to combat this? A population-based study of perceived work environment and work-related disorders among employees in Sweden. BMC Public Health, 2020; 20(1): 1-15.
26. ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA SAÚDE. Relatório mundial de envelhecimento e saúde. Brasília, 2015.
27. OUZZANI M, et al. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 2016; 5(1): 1-10.
28. PARKER M, et al. Population-based estimates of healthy working life expectancy in England at age 50 years: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. The Lancet Public Health, 2020; 5(7): e395-e403.
29. SCHLOCHAUER C. Lifelong learners: o poder do aprendizado contínuo. São Paulo: Gente, 2021.
30. SCIAMA DS, et al. Envelhecimento ativo: representações sociais dos profissionais de saúde das Unidades de Referência à Saúde do Idoso. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 2020; 54.
31. SEWDAS R, et al. Why older workers work beyond the retirement age: a qualitative study. BMC public health, 2017; 17(1): 1-9.
32. SILVA-SILVA E. Trabalho e desgaste mental: o direito de ser dono de si mesmo. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
33. SOUSA NFDS, et al. Envelhecimento ativo: prevalência e diferenças de gênero e idade em estudo de base populacional. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2018; 34.
34. SOUSA-RIBEIRO M, et al. Health-and age-related workplace factors as predictors of preferred, expected, and actual retirement timing: findings from a Swedish cohort study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021; 18(5): 2746.
35. STIFTUNG B (editor). Active Aging in Economy and Society: Carl Bertelsmann Prize 2006. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2010.
36. THOMSON A e GANZ S. Annual Atwood Bibliography 2018. Margaret Atwood Studies. 2019; 13: 42-234.
37. TRICCO AC, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 2018; 169(7): 467-473.
38. VIVES A, et al. Gender and ageing at work in Chile: employment, working conditions, work–life balance and health of men and women in an ageing workforce. Annals of work exposures and health, 2018; 62(4): 475-489.
39. WELSH J, et al. Health or harm? A cohort study of the importance of job quality in extended workforce participation by older adults. BMC Public Health, 2016; 16(1): 1-14.
40. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Active ageing: A policy framework (N. WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8). World Health Organization, 2002.
41. Yin RK. Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2016.
42. ZACHER H e YANG J. Organizational climate for successful aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016; 7: 1007.
43. ZACHER H, et al. Age-differential effects of job characteristics on job attraction: A policy-capturing study. Frontiers in psychology, 2017; 8: 1124.
44. ZANELLI JC, et al. Psicologia, organizações e trabalho no Brasil-2. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2014.
2. ARKSEY H e O'MALLEY L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 2005; 8(1): 19-32.
3. BAUER MW e GASKELL G. Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. 13. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2017.
4. BLOMÉ MW, et al. Attitudes towards elderly workers and perceptions of integrated age management practices. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2018: 1-14.
5. BOOTH A. The literature review: its role within research. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles: Sage, 2016.
6. BROWN M e McCOOL, B. Active aging: life design for health. Chicago: BookBaby, 2019.
7. COGIN J. Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012; 23(11): 2268-2294.
8. DEJOURS C. A loucura do trabalho: estudo de psicopatologia do trabalho. 6 ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2015.
9. EDGE CE, et al. Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus. Public health reviews, 2017; 38(1): 1-27.
10. GONG CH e HE X. Factors predicting voluntary and involuntary workforce transitions at mature ages: Evidence from HILDA in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019; 16(19): 3769.
11. GRANT MJ e BOOTH A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 2009; 26(2): 91-108.
12. HILLMAN DR. Understanding Multigenerational Work-Value Conflict Resolution. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health. 2014; 29(3): 240-257.
13. HOVBRANDT P, et al. Prerequisites and driving forces behind an extended working life among older workers, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2017; 26:3, 171-183.
14. HOVBRANDT P, et al. Psychosocial Working Conditions and Social Participation. A 10-Year Follow-Up of Senior Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021; 18(17): 9154.
15. HUSIC JB, et al. Aging at work: A review of recent trends and future directions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020; 17(20): 7659.
16. HWANG E, et al. The virtual environment in communication of age-friendly design. Technologies for active aging. Boston: Springer, 2013.
17. INSTITUTE TJB. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2015 edition/Supplemen; 2015.
18. KIM J e HA J. The Meaning of Work and Self-Management Experiences among Elderly Workers with Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8(4): 471.
19. KLUGAR M, et al. The personal active aging strategies of older adults in Europe: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2016; 14(5): 193-257.
20. MARQUES LP, et al. Quality of life and its association with work, the Internet, participation in groups and physical activity among the elderly from the EpiFloripa survey, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2016; 32: e00143615.
21. MATEO RODRÍGUEZ I, et al. Elaboración de criterios e indicadores para desarrollar y evaluar programas de envejecimiento saludable en los lugares de trabajo. Revista espanola de salud publica, 2015; 89(5): 497-514.
22. MELNYK BM e FINEOUT-OVERHOLT E, editores. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Nova York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
23. MUNN Z, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 2018; 18(1): 1-7.
24. NILSSON K. Managers’ attitudes to their older employees: A cross-sectional study. Work, 2018; 59(1): 49-58.
25. NILSSON K. When is work a cause of early retirement and are there any effective organizational measures to combat this? A population-based study of perceived work environment and work-related disorders among employees in Sweden. BMC Public Health, 2020; 20(1): 1-15.
26. ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA SAÚDE. Relatório mundial de envelhecimento e saúde. Brasília, 2015.
27. OUZZANI M, et al. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 2016; 5(1): 1-10.
28. PARKER M, et al. Population-based estimates of healthy working life expectancy in England at age 50 years: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. The Lancet Public Health, 2020; 5(7): e395-e403.
29. SCHLOCHAUER C. Lifelong learners: o poder do aprendizado contínuo. São Paulo: Gente, 2021.
30. SCIAMA DS, et al. Envelhecimento ativo: representações sociais dos profissionais de saúde das Unidades de Referência à Saúde do Idoso. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 2020; 54.
31. SEWDAS R, et al. Why older workers work beyond the retirement age: a qualitative study. BMC public health, 2017; 17(1): 1-9.
32. SILVA-SILVA E. Trabalho e desgaste mental: o direito de ser dono de si mesmo. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
33. SOUSA NFDS, et al. Envelhecimento ativo: prevalência e diferenças de gênero e idade em estudo de base populacional. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2018; 34.
34. SOUSA-RIBEIRO M, et al. Health-and age-related workplace factors as predictors of preferred, expected, and actual retirement timing: findings from a Swedish cohort study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021; 18(5): 2746.
35. STIFTUNG B (editor). Active Aging in Economy and Society: Carl Bertelsmann Prize 2006. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2010.
36. THOMSON A e GANZ S. Annual Atwood Bibliography 2018. Margaret Atwood Studies. 2019; 13: 42-234.
37. TRICCO AC, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 2018; 169(7): 467-473.
38. VIVES A, et al. Gender and ageing at work in Chile: employment, working conditions, work–life balance and health of men and women in an ageing workforce. Annals of work exposures and health, 2018; 62(4): 475-489.
39. WELSH J, et al. Health or harm? A cohort study of the importance of job quality in extended workforce participation by older adults. BMC Public Health, 2016; 16(1): 1-14.
40. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Active ageing: A policy framework (N. WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8). World Health Organization, 2002.
41. Yin RK. Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2016.
42. ZACHER H e YANG J. Organizational climate for successful aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016; 7: 1007.
43. ZACHER H, et al. Age-differential effects of job characteristics on job attraction: A policy-capturing study. Frontiers in psychology, 2017; 8: 1124.
44. ZANELLI JC, et al. Psicologia, organizações e trabalho no Brasil-2. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2014.