Keywords
Treatment
Laser
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To discuss the techniques used in conventional treatments for hemorrhoidal disease (HD), correlating the existing strategies between the techniques in order to qualify the best studies regarding the postoperative period and the better quality of life of the patient after surgery. Methods: An integrative review of articles was performed, with a search using the PubMed virtual database. The study included articles comparing HD surgical methods and techniques and articles that exposed a technique, which addressed surgical prognosis associated with the patient's signs and symptoms when performing these. Results: Eleven studies were retrieved that had a multimodal comparison of techniques. The total number of people surveyed in the works was 2071 people, 819 women and 1046 men. The age variant of the study was 18 years to 59 years, with a mean age of 38 years. The number of people who underwent PPH was 612 people, Final considerations: Conventional surgery techniques have better long-term results. Despite good results in the immediate postoperative period, Mechanical Circular Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH) and Transanal hemorrhoidal deterialization (THD) do not present safe long-term results.
References
BLEDAY R, et al. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum, 1992; 35: 477-481.
CHEN JS. Current Status of Surgical Treatment for Hemorrhoids- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chang Gung Med J., 2010;33: 488-500.
DAL MONTE PP, et al. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol, 2007; 11: 333–339.
DE NARDI P, et al. A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Short- and Long-term Results of Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoid Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Excision Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014; 57: 348-353.
ELMÉR SE, et al. A Randomized Trial of Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Anopexy Compared With Open Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum., 2013; 56: 484-490.
FERGUSON JA, et al. The Closed Technique of hemorrhoidectomy. Surgery, 1971; 70, 480-484.
GIAMUNDO P, et al. The Hemorrhoid Laser Procedure Technique vs rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatments for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colum Rectum, 2011; 54(6): 693-698.
GORDON P, NIVATVONGS, S. Principles and Practice for the Surgery of Colon, Rectum and Anus. 3 ed. Informa Healthcare, 2007;143p.
GREENSPON J, et al. Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids: Outcome After Conservative or Surgical Management. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2014; 47: 1493–1498.
HODGSON WJ, MORGAN J. Ambulatory hemorrhoidopexy with CO2 laser. Dis Colon Rectum, 1995; 38: 1265-1269.
JAYARAMAN S, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal haemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional haemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007; 50: 1297-1305.
KAIDAR O, et al. Hemorrhoidal disease: A comprehensive review. J Am Coll Surg., 2006; 204: 102-117.
NADERAN M, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laser Intra-Hemorrhoidal Coagulation and Milligan–Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 2016; 30: 325-331.
OMEER A, et al. A Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective study with a 6-year follow-up. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2011; 54: 601-608.
OMMER A, et al. Continence disorders after anal surgery - a relevant problem?. Colorectal Dis, 2008; 23: 1023–1031.
ORTIZ H, et al. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. The British journal of surgery, 2002; 89: 1376-1381
RIVADENEIRA D, et al. Practice Parameters for the Management of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011; 54: 1059–1064.
SANTOS G, et al. Surgical complications in 2.840 cases of hemorrhoidectomy by Milligan-Morgan, Ferguson and combined techniques. J Coloproctol, 2012; 32: 271-290.
SCHUBERT MC, et al. What every gastroenterologist needs to know about common anorectal disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 2009; 15: 3201-3209.
SCHUURMAN H, et al. Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery, 2012; 255: 840-845.
SENAGORE A, et al. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and One-Year Results. Dis Colon and Rectum, 2004; 47: 1824-1836.
SOBRADO CW. Tratamento tópico das doenças anorretais. Revista Bras de Medicina, 2013; 14: 34-42.
WANG JY, et al. The role of lasers in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum., 1991; 34: 78-82.
WATSON AJM, et al. Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2016; 388: 2375–2385.