Abstract
Objective: To review the approaches and challenges in obstetric management of uterine rupture cases, including the main clinical signs and symptoms, as well as methods for early diagnosis, prevention, and monitoring of pregnant women with risk factors. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted using the PubMed and BVS databases, with the descriptors “uterine rupture,” “dehiscence,” and “management.” Articles published between 2015 and 2025 in English, Portuguese, and French were selected. Results: The final sample consisted of 16 articles. It was observed that changes in fetal heart rate tracing represent the main finding for early detection, while sudden abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, Bandl-Frommel sign and ultrasonographic findings complement the clinical presentation. Immediate management of hemorrhage should be performed simultaneously with surgical intervention, with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. Although ultrasound assessment of the lower uterine segment shows potential as a predictive tool for dehiscence and rupture, there is still no consensus on reliable parameters, highlighting the need for further studies. Final considerations: Rigorous surveillance, early recognition of clinical signs, and a structured obstetric management approach are essential to reduce maternal perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture.
References
DAHAL J, SAHA R. Scar Rupture in Early Puerperium: A Case Report. Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 2022; 60(249): 491-493.
DESHMUKH U, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2024; 230(3): 783-803.
DESSEAUVE D, et al. Fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with uterine rupture: a case–control study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2016; 197: 16-21.
FARHAT IB, et al. Retrospective study of 60 cases of uterine rupture at the Maternity Center of Monastir, Tunisia. Pan African Medical Journal, 2024; 47(83).
FEITOSA FEL, FEITOSA ESL. Rotura uterina: da suspeita ao tratamento. Femina, 2022; 50(9): 568-571.
FIGUEIRÓ-FILHO EA, et al. Risk Factors Associated with Uterine Rupture and Dehiscence: A Cross-Sectional Canadian Study. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia Obstetrícia, 2021; 43(11): 820-825.
MENGESHA MB, et al. Determinants of Uterine Rupture and Its Management Outcomes among mothers who gave birth at public hospital at Tigrai, North Etiopia: An unmatched case control study. Journal of Pregnancy, 2020; 2020(1).
MUTISO SK, et al. Uterine rupture in the first trimester: a case report and review of the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2024; 18(5).
REIS YA, et al. Importance of hemogram parameters for predicting uterine scar dehiscence. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, 2024; 25(1): 38-43.
SARWAR I, et al. Validity of Transabdominal Ultrasound Scan in the Prediction of uterine scar thickness. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 2020; 32(1): 68-72.
SONG SY, et al. Two pregnancy cases of uterine scar dehiscence after laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 2015; 58(6): 518-521.
TAMILARASAN R, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of ruptured scar of previous cesarean section with secondary intra-abdominal pregnancy. Radiology Case Reports, 2025; 20(11): 5562-5568.
TANOS V, TONEY ZA. Uterine scar rupture- Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2019; 59: 115-131.
TOGIOKA B, TONISMAE T. Uterine Rupture. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2025.
ZERMANO S, et al. Prenatal Detection and Conservative Management of Uterine Scar Dehiscence in Patient with Previous Uterine Rupture and Multiple Surgeries-A Case Report. Healthcare (Basel), 2024; 12(10).
ZHU Z, et al. Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery. Annals of Medicine, 2021; 53(1):1265-1269.
