Keywords
Amniotic membrane
Wound healing
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the scientific evidence regarding the use of the amniotic membrane as a biological dressing in the treatment of partial-thickness burns. Literature review: Partial-thickness burns represent a significant public health problem, requiring therapeutic approaches that promote wound healing, reduce infectious complications, and improve patient comfort. In this context, the amniotic membrane has been established as an effective temporary biological dressing due to its low immunogenicity, good biocompatibility, and regenerative properties. Its composition, rich in collagen, cytokines, and growth factors, contributes to the modulation of the inflammatory response, acceleration of re-epithelialization, and pain reduction. Clinical and experimental evidence also demonstrates antimicrobial effects and a reduced need for dressing changes when compared with conventional methods. Despite promising results, factors such as biological variability of the tissue, costs, and lack of standardized application protocols still limit its universal recommendation. Final considerations: The use of the amniotic membrane in the treatment of partial-thickness burns represents a safe and effective therapeutic strategy, associated with improved clinical outcomes and optimized patient care.
References
ADLY OA, et al. Assessment of amniotic and polyurethane membrane dressings in the treatment of burns. Burns, 2010; 36: 703–710.
BRANSKI LK, HERNDON DN. Contemporary methods allowing for safe and convenient use of amniotic membrane as a biologic wound dressing for burns. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2017; 78: S9–S10.
BRANSKI LK, et al. Amnion in the treatment of pediatric partial-thickness facial burns. Burns, 2008; 34: 393–399.
BUJANG-SAFAWI E, et al. Dried irradiated human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing for facial burns—A 7-year case series. Burns, 2010; 36: 876–882.
BURGESS M. The immune and regenerative response to burn injury. Cells, 2022; 11: 3073.
GREENHALGH DG. Management of burns. New England Journal of Medicine, 2019; 380(24): 2349–2359.
JACKSON DM. The diagnosis of the depth of burning. British Journal of Surgery, 1953; 40: 588–596.
JESCHKE MG, et al. Burn injury. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2020; 6(1): 11.
KELLY EJ, et al. Infection and burn injury. European Burn Journal, 2022; 3: 165–179.
KUMAR RJ, et al. Treatment of partial-thickness burns: a prospective, randomized trial using Transcyte. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2004; 74: 622–626.
LAL S, et al. Biobrane improves wound healing in burned children without increased risk of infection. Shock, 2000; 14: 314–319.
LEON-VILLAPALOS J, et al. The use of human deceased donor skin allograft in burn care. Cell and Tissue Banking, 2010; 11: 99–104.
LIMA JÚNIOR EM, et al. Pediatric burn treatment using tilapia skin as a xenograft for superficial-partial thickness wounds: a pilot study. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 2020; 41: 241–247.
LŐRINCZ A, et al. Paediatric partial-thickness burn therapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Life, 2022; 12: 619.
MORAES FILHO MO, et al. Nile tilapia fish skin-based wound dressing improves pain and treatment-related costs of superficial partial-thickness burns: a phase III randomized controlled trial. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021; 147: 1189–1198.
NORMAN G, et al. Antiseptics for burns. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017; 7: CD011821.
ORGILL DP, OGAWA R. Current methods of burn reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2013; 131(5): 827e–836e.
ORYAN A, et al. Burn wound healing: present concepts, treatment strategies and future directions. Journal of Wound Care, 2017; 26(1): 5–19.
SEBASTIAN SJ. How does a skin graft donor site heal? Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific, 2024; 29(4): 370–371.
SMOLLE C, et al. Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: a systematic review. Burns, 2017; 43(2): 249–257.
SONG Y-T, et al. Extracellular matrix-based biomaterials in burn wound repair: a promising therapeutic strategy. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024; 283(3): 137633.
YANG C, et al. Efficacy and feasibility of amniotic membrane for the treatment of burn wounds: a meta-analysis. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2021; 90: 744–755.