Resumo
Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão da literatura sobre os tratamentos para o glaucoma associado à hipertensão ocular. Revisão bibliográfica: O tratamento padrão para glaucoma e hipertensão ocular é realizado principalmente via monoterapia tópica (uso de colírios), especialmente com análogos de prostaglandina (como latanoprosta, latanoprosteno e tafluprosta). Dentro deste contexto, tais colírios em suas versões sem conservantes possuem, no geral, maior tolerabilidade, segurança, e o mesmo efeito desejado que suas versões com conservantes. Além dos análogos de prostaglandinas, o tratamento do glaucoma e hipertensão ocular também pode ser realizado com monoterapias de betabloqueadores tópicos (timolol e betaxolol), embora tenha sido demonstrada sua inferioridade em relação às prostaglandinas. Outro achado importante foi que os resultados em longo prazo da trabeculoplastia, se comparados com o uso de colírios, seriam melhores e com melhor custo-efetividade do que o tratamento padrão. Considerações finais: Com base nos achados desta revisão, sugere-se a realização de ensaios clínicos envolvendo os tratamentos citados, buscando evidências científicas robustas de sua eficácia no tratamento da hipertensão ocular.
Referências
CHABI A, et al. Preservative-free tafluprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in India: a phase III clinical trial. Int J Clin Pract., 2016; 70(7): 577–86.
CHAMARD C, et al. Prevalence of Unknown Ocular Hypertension, Glaucoma Suspects, and Glaucoma in Patients Seen in an Ophthalmology Center in France. Ophthalmic Res., 2020; 63(3): 295–301.
CHI W, et al. Efficacy of combined administration of 0.2% brimonidine and 0.5% betaxolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Eye Sci., 2013; 28(4): 190–4.
CONLON R, et al. Glaucoma treatment trends: a review. Can J Ophthalmol J Can Ophtalmol., 2017; 52(1): 114–24.
DENIS P e MONOPROST FRENCH STUDY GROUP. [Unpreserved latanoprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. A multicenter, randomized, controlled study]. J Fr Ophtalmol., 2016; 39(7): 622–30.
DURU Z e OZSAYGILI C. Preservative-free versus preserved brimonidine %0.15 preparations in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: short term evaluation of efficacy, safety, and potential advantages. Cutan Ocul Toxicol., 2020; 39(1): 21–4.
EVELETH D, et al. A 4-week, dose-ranging study comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of latanoprost 75, 100 and 125 μg/mL to latanoprost 50 μg/mL (xalatan) in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. BMC Ophthalmol., 2012; 12: 9.
FOGAGNOLO P e ROSSETTI L. Medical treatment of glaucoma: present and future. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2011; 20(7): 947–59.
GARCIA-MEDINA JJ, et al. Glaucoma and Antioxidants: Review and Update. Antioxid Basel Switz, 2020; 9(11): E1031.
GAZZARD G, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl., 2019; 393(10180): 1505–16.
GOEL M, et al. Aqueous humor dynamics: a review. Open Ophthalmol J. 2010; 4: 52–9.
GOLAN S, et al. Original and generic latanoprost for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: are they really the same? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol., 2015; 42(2): 220–4.
GUGLIELMI P, et al. Novel therapies for glaucoma: a patent review (2013-2019). Expert Opin Ther Pat., 2019; 29(10): 769–80.
HUANG AS, et al. Structural and functional imaging of aqueous humour outflow: a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol., 2018; 46(2): 158–68.
JAYARAM H. Intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma: Does every mmHg count? Taiwan J Ophthalmol., 2020; 10(4): 255–8.
KARLOVA EV, et al. [Preservative-free fixed combination in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: the VISIONARY Study (EUPAS22204)]. Vestn Oftalmol., 2020; 136(4): 76–84.
KASS MA, et al. Assessment of Cumulative Incidence and Severity of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Participants in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study After 20 Years of Follow-up. JAMA Ophthalmol., 2021; 139(5): 558–66.
LUSTHAUS J e GOLDBERG I. Current management of glaucoma. Med J Aust., 2019; 210(4): 180–7.
MANASSES DT, et al. The New Era of Glaucoma Micro-stent Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther., 2016; 5(2): 135–46.
MARSHALL LL, et al. Therapy for Open-Angle Glaucoma. Consult Pharm J Am Soc Consult Pharm., 2018; 33(8): 432–45.
MISIUK-HOJLO M, et al. The RELIEF study: Tolerability and efficacy of preservative-free latanoprost in the treatment of glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol., 2019; 29(2): 210–5.
RAZEGHINEJAD MR e LEE D. Managing normal tension glaucoma by lowering the intraocular pressure. Surv Ophthalmol. fevereiro de 2019;64(1):111–6.
SCHEHLEIN EM, et al. New classes of glaucoma medications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol., 2017; 28(2): 161–8.
SKRZYPECKI J, et al. A common humoral background of intraocular and arterial blood pressure dysregulation. Curr Med Res Opin., 2018; 34(3): 521–9.
TANITO M e MATSUO M. Ab-interno trabeculotomy-related glaucoma surgeries. Taiwan J Ophthalmol., 2019; 9(2): 67–71.
WANG T, et al. Topical Medication Therapy for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Front Pharmacol., 2021; 12: 749858.
WEBB TER. A review of glaucoma surgical therapy. Vet Ophthalmol., 2021; 24 Suppl 1: 34–8.
WEINREB RN, et al. A randomised, controlled comparison of latanoprostene bunod and latanoprost 0.005% in the treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: the VOYAGER study. Br J Ophthalmol., 2015; 99(6): 738–45.
