Abstract
Objective: Analyze the main neonatal injuries caused by using different types of forceps in operative deliveries. Methods: A search was carried out for previous studies on PubMed and BVS Regional Portal platforms and a total of 28 scientific articles were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Based on the studies analyzed, it was observed that forceps, when compared to vacuum-extractor, presents lower risk of neonatal soft tissue injuries, cephalohaematomas and jaundice. However, facial fetal injuries occur more when forceps are used. Furthermore, Kielland forceps stands out as the most effective and safe method among other instruments and the use of Naegele forceps also shows great success. Complications found include: shoulder dystocia, seizures, low Apgar, subgaleal hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, facial nerve injury, hydrocephalus, brachial plexus injury, vitreous hemorrhage, among others. Final considerations: There are many studies comparing use of forceps and other aid instruments in operative deliveries, regarding fetal injuries, but there are no studies that provide comparisons between the different types of forceps, detailing the neonatal injuries most frequently caused by each of them.
References
AHLBERG M, et al. Risk factors for failed vacuum extraction and associated complications in term newborn infants: a population-based cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(10): 1646–1651.
BAHL R, et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2013; 120(12): 1526–1532.
CAUGHEY AB, et al. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(5): 908-912.
CORCORAN S, et al. How safe is preterm operative vaginal delivery and which is the instrument of choice? J Perinat Med. 2013; 41(1): 57–60.
CUNHA AA. Indicações do parto a fórceps. Femina. 2011; 39(12).
DOLE C, et al. Intra pelvic spontaneous rotation of persistent occiput posterior position in case of operative vaginal delivery with spatulas. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021; 50(2): 101943.
FERRAZ A, et al. [Short-term neonatal outcomes of vacuum-assisted delivery. A case-control study]. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019; 91(6): 378–385.
FREEMAN MD, et al. A multistate population-based analysis of linked maternal and neonatal discharge records to identify risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus injury. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017; 136(3): 331–336.
GARDELLA C, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(4): 896-902.
HINKSON L, et al. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224(1): 93.e1–7.
JOHNSON JH, et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(3): 513-518.
KAWAKITA T, et al. Neonatal complications associated with use of fetal scalp electrode: a retrospective study. BJOG. 2016; 123(11): 1797–1803.
MATSUMOTO N, et al. Naegele forceps delivery and association between morbidity and the number of forceps traction applications: a retrospective study. J Pregnancy. 2015; 2015: 483195.
MCANENA L, et al. Forceps delivery-related ophthalmic injuries: a case series. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015; 52(6): 355–359.
MILLER ES, et al. Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(2): 248-254.
MILLER ES, et al. Duration of operative vaginal delivery and adverse obstetric outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2019; 37(05): 503–510.
MORÁVKOVÁ P, et al. Operative vaginal deliveries and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes - prospective analysis. Ceska Gynekol. 2019; 84(2): 93–98.
MURACA GM, et al. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery. CMAJ. 2022; 194(1): E1-E12.
MURGUÍA-GONZÁLEZ A, et al. [Risk factors of birth obstetric trauma]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013; 81(6): 297–303.
O’BRIEN S, et al. Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 212: 119–125.
REHM A, et al. Obstetric neonatal brachial plexus and facial nerve injuries: A 17 years single tertiary maternity hospital experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 243: 57–62.
SHEKHAR S, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing maternal and fetal effects of forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013; 63(2): 116–119.
TEMPEST N, et al. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG. 2013; 120(10): 1277–1284.
TEMPEST N, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of successful manual rotation to correct malposition of the fetal head; A retrospective and prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0176861.
WALSH CA, et al. Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121(1): 122–128.
WAN L, et al. Effect of perineum protection cooperated by two operators in the forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(1): 197–200.
WEN Q, et al. Temporal trends in severe maternal and neonatal trauma during childbirth: a population-based observational study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(3): e020578.
YAMASATO K, et al. Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(21): 3568–3573.
ZABEN M, et al. Subdural haematoma in neonates following forceps-assisted delivery: case series and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019; 35(3): 403-409.
ZHANG VR, et al. Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital. Singapore Med J. 2023; 64(5): 313-318.
