Google Scholar | Citations: 958 | h-index: 12 i10-index: 19
Surgical versus clinical treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild to severe obesity
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Bariatric surgery
Diabetes mellitus
Treatment outcome

How to Cite

Surgical versus clinical treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild to severe obesity. (2024). Revista Eletrônica Acervo Médico, 24, e18106. https://doi.org/10.25248/reamed.e18106.2024

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To compare surgical versus clinical treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and mild to severe obesity. Evaluating the benefits of the two therapeutic modalities and seeking to answer which one brings more significant changes in the parameters of T2DM. Methods: This is an integrative review of the literature in the National Library of Medicine and Virtual Health Library databases. The Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) were used: “bariatric surgery”, “diabetes mellitus” and “treatment outcome ”. The inclusion criteria were free full text, clinical trial, randomized controlled trial, published in English, Portuguese and Spanish between 2014 and 2024. Results: 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included relating to 1049 patients, 474 of whom underwent metabolic surgical treatment and 575 isolated clinical treatment associated or not with lifestyle changes. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 months. Final considerations: Metabolic surgical treatment is superior to clinical treatment for short- and long-term T2DM remission in terms of benefits on metabolic conditions and cardiovascular risk factors. However, this superiority is mainly associated with the reduction in obesity, which is much more intense in the surgical treatment group.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ALBELADI B, et al. Short- and Midterm Results between Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity. Journal of Obesity, 2013; 2013: 1–6.

AMINIAN A, et al. Patient-reported Outcomes After Metabolic Surgery Versus Medical Therapy for Diabetes: Insights From the STAMPEDE Randomized Trial. Annals of Surgery, 2021; 274(3): 524–532.

ARAS M, et al. Obesity and Diabetes. Nursing Clinics of North America, 2021; 56(4): 527–541.

ARTERBURN AOS, et al. Association Between Bariatric Surgery and Long-term Survival. JAMA, 2015; 313(1): 62.

CHANG S-H, et al. The Effectiveness and Risks of Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg, 2014; 149(3): 275.

COHEN RV, et al. Effect of Gastric Bypass vs Best Medical Treatment on Early-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg, 2020; 155(8): 200420.

COURCOULAS AP, et al. Bariatric Surgery vs Lifestyle Intervention for Diabetes Treatment: 5-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2020; 105(3): 866–876.

COURCOULAS AP, et al. Surgical vs Medical Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg, 2014; 149(7): 707.

COURCOULAS AP, et al. Three-Year Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery vs Lifestyle Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg, 2015; 150(10): 931.

CUMMINGS DE, et al. Gastric bypass surgery vs intensive lifestyle and medical intervention for type 2 diabetes: the CROSSROADS randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia, 2016; 59(5): 945–953.

GOYAL R, et al. Type 2 Diabetes. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024.

HALPERIN F, et al. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery or Lifestyle With Intensive Medical Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Feasibility and 1-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg, 2014; 149(7): 716.

HSU C-C, et al. Effect of Bariatric Surgery vs Medical Treatment on Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Body Mass Index Lower Than 35: Five-Year Outcomes. JAMA Surg, 2015; 150(12): 1117.

IKRAMUDDIN S, et al. Durability of Addition of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Lifestyle Intervention and Medical Management in Achieving Primary Treatment Goals for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in Mild to Moderate Obesity: A Randomized Control Trial. Diabetes Care, 2016; 39(9): 1510–1518.

ILYAS S, et al. Bariatric Surgery and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Assessing Factors Leading to Remission. A Systematic Review. Cureus, 2020.

KHOO CM, et al. Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass or Diabetes Support and Education on Insulin Sensitivity and Insulin Secretion in Morbidly Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Annals of Surgery, 2014; 259(3): 494–501.

MADSBAD S, et al. Mechanisms of changes in glucose metabolism and bodyweight after bariatric surgery. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2014; 2(2): 152–164.

PANUGANTI KK, et al. Obesity. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024.

SCHAUER PR, et al. Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 5-Year Outcomes. N Engl J Med, 2017; 376(7): 641–651.

SIMONSON DC, et al. Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes 3 Years After Randomization to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery Versus Intensive Lifestyle Management: The SLIMM-T2D Study. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41(4): 670–679.

WIGGINS T, et al. Association of bariatric surgery with all-cause mortality and incidence of obesity- related disease at a population level: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med, 2020; 17(7): 1003206.

YAN Y, et al. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Medical Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Medicine, 2016; 95(17): 3462.