Abstract
Objective: To analyze the biomechanical principles of anterior guidance and its customization in oral rehabilitation using analog and digital workflows, highlighting clinical applications, limitations, and gaps in the scientific literature. Literature review: Anterior guidance is fundamental to functional occlusion, promoting posterior disocclusion, protection of the stomatognathic system, and restorative longevity. Its absence may cause restoration fractures, tooth wear, and occlusal instability. Anterior guidance should be customized according to the patient's occlusion through analog and digital workflows. The analog method, based on semiadjustable articulators and customized incisal guide tables, established the biomechanical foundations of oral rehabilitation but presented limitations related to material dimensional instability, subjectivity of occlusal analysis, and lower transfer accuracy. The digital workflow, based on CAD/CAM systems, intraoral scanners, virtual articulators, and mandibular tracking, improved precision, functional individualization, and restorative predictability. Nevertheless, there is no robust evidence regarding the superiority of the digital method over the conventional approach in longitudinal clinical validation and accuracy for full-arch applications. Final considerations: Digital dentistry represents an important advancement in the reconstruction of anterior guidance; however, its effectiveness depends on the application of classical biomechanical principles. The integration of traditional scientific knowledge and technological innovation constitutes the most predictable approach for achieving functional and stable oral rehabilitation.
References
DURET F, et al. CAD-CAM in dentistry. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1988; 117(6):715-20.
FENG Y, et al. Is dynamic occlusal design necessary for anterior guidance recovery in the computer-aided design process? An in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry, 2024; 142:104833.
FERRANDO-CASCALES Á, et al. A facially driven complete-mouth rehabilitation with ultrathin CAD-CAM composite resin veneers for a patient with severe tooth wear: A minimally invasive approach. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2020; 123(4):537-547.
GROSS MD, CARDASH HS. Transferring anterior occlusal guidance to the articulator. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1989; 61(3):282-5.
GYSI A. The problem of articulation. Dental Cosmos, 1910; 52(1): 1-19.
HE S, WANG S, et al. Effect of the use of stabilization splint on masticatory muscle activities in TMD patients with centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy and absence of anterior/lateral guidance. Cranio, 2021; 39(5):424-432.
JIRAJARIYAVEJ B, et al. Accuracy of individual mandibular motion records using intraoral scanner for fixed implant-supported prosthesis designs: a comparative study. BMC Oral Health, 2025; 25(1):878.
KERSTEIN RB, RADKE J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Cranio, 2014; 32(1):13-23.
KORDASS B. The virtual articulator in dentistry: concept and development. Dental Clinics of North America, 2002; 46(3):493-506.
LEE SM, et al. Digital facial analysis for prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient with decreased vertical dimension of occlusion associated with severe tooth wear: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2025, S0022-3913(25)00928-X.
LEPIDI L, et al. Dynamic modeling of the anterior guidance slope using a jaw tracking system in a fully digital CAD-CAM workflow. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2026, 135(3):477-483.
NADA EL OSTA, et al. Time efficiency and cost of fabricating removable complete dentures using digital, hybrid, and conventional workflows: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2025,133(5):1194-1208.
NEEDLES JW. Mandibular movements and articulator design. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1922; 10: 927-935.
OKESON JP. Tratamento dos distúrbios temporomandibulares e oclusão. 8.ed. GEN Guanabara Koogan: Rio de Janeiro-RJ, 2021; cap.3, p65-69.
PACKEAESER MG, et al. Influence of core material and occlusal contact pattern on fatigue behavior of different monolithic ceramic crowns. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2025; 163:106891.
PARK JS, et al. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions in partially dentate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 2025;160:105918.
PEGORARO LF, et al. Prótese fixa: bases para o planejamento em reabilitação oral. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 2014; cap. 6, p192-196.
PHOENIX RD, ENGELMEIER RL. The contributions of Dr. Alfred Gysi. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2018; 27(3):276-283.
SCHUYLER CH. The function and importance of incisal guidance in oral rehabilitation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1963; 86(3):219-32.
STANDLEE J, et al. Stress transfer to the mandible during anterior guidance and group function eccentric movements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1979; 41(1):35-9.
STUART CE, STALLARD H. Principles involved in restoring occlusion of the natural teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1960; Vol. 10. No. 2. pp. 304-313.
UTSUMI Y, et al. Resin composite injection technique with a digital workflow to reconstruct canine guidance: A two-year follow-up. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2025 27:155-161.
VALENTI M, SCHMITZ JH. A reverse digital workflow by using an interim restoration scan and patient-specific motion with an intraoral scanner. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2021; 126(1):19-23.
WANG Y, et al. From virtual maxillomandibular relationship determination to clinical implementation for digital functional-esthetic rehabilitation in severe generalized tooth surface loss. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2025 37(11):2347-2357.
WILLIAMSON EH, LUNDQUIST DO. Anterior guidance: Its effect on electromyographic activity of the temporal and masseter muscles. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1983; 49(6):816-23.
