Abstract
Composite resins (RCs) are materials widely used in dentistry as a restorative method. Despite this, its thickness capacity has limiting factors that interfere in an improvement in results. Thus, bulkfill RCs (RCB) arise with the possibility of unique increments in restorative processes. The objective of this work is to review the literature about what is known up to the current context about this restorative material, showing the clinical applicability of RCB, in addition to its properties as an effective implement in restorative dentistry. The following health descriptors were used: composite resins, polymerization, operative dentistry, clinical evaluation and chemistry applied in the PubMed and Science Direct databases, in English and interconnected by the Boolean operator “AND”. Of the 143 studies found, 133 were excluded for presenting one or more exclusion criteria, and 10 studies were included in this review. The RCBs through their chemical properties allow greater speed in clinical treatments, reducing technical complexities in professionais procedures, in addition to the ability to increase more advantageous than conventional RCs. However, further studies with longer evaluation periods are needed before a definitive recommendation for changes to clinical protocols.
References
ALSHALI RZ, et al. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of monomers of uncured bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Dent Mater. 2015; 31(6): 711-720. 14.
ALGAMAIAH H, et al. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29(2): 118-127.
AKALIN TT, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Activated High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Nanohybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities: A Prospective Clinical Study up to 2 Years. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018; 26(3): 152-160.
BILGILI D, et al. Surface properties and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. J Dent., 2020; 95: 103317.
CANALI GD, et al. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23(2): 889-897.
CANEPPELE TMF, BRESCIANI E. Resinas bulk-fill - O estado da arte. Rev. Assoc. Paul. Cir. Dent. [online]. 2016; 70(3): 242-248.
CHAGAS LS. Avaliação da resistência flexural e módulo de elasticidade de uma resina do tipo bulk fill em comparação com uma resina convencional, 2016.
ERSEN KA, et al. Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24(5): 1687-1693.
FRANCA S. Odontologia restauradora na era adesiva. Rev. Assoc. Paul. Cir. Dent. [online]. 2016; 70(3): 234-241.
HIRATA R, et al. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using microcomputed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2015; 103(4): 798-806.
HOLANDA LVB, et al. Desempenho das propriedades físico-mecânicas das resinas bulk-fill: revisão de literatura. Jornada Odontológica dos Acadêmicos da Católica, 2016; 2(1).
JUNIOR ECR. Estudo de propriedades de resinas compostas bulk fill. 2015. Dissertação de Mestrado (Odontologia) – USP, 2016.
TAHA NA, et al. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2017; 63: 60-64.
TOMAZ B, et al. Análise da microdureza de resinas compostas bulk fill. In: Encontros Universitários da UFC, 2016; 1
VAN D, et al. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Dentistry, 2016; 51: 29-35.
VELOSO SRM, et al. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23(1): 221-233.
ZORZIN J, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater. 2015; 31(3): 293-301.
