Keywords
Canine tooth
Orthodontics
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
The objective of this work is to evaluate a correlation between channels at a distance and as more occlusions. It treated an observational and prospective study, data that were collected from 110 orthodontic documents and study models, from patients between 12 and 35 years old. The variables studied were: age, sex, racial pattern, molar angle ratio, plus occlusions and intercanine distances. The data were recorded in specific forms and distributed in tables, where analytical statistics were applied through Student and ANOVA tests (p <0.05). The results were as follows: the average age was 17.7 years; a majority of the sample was female (58.7%) and feoderms (43.6%). The Class I relationship is more frequent (46.4% on the right; 49.1% on the left) and a more prevalent occlusion was tooth crowding (67.7%). The distance media were: 33.98 mm, for an upper arch and 26.11 mm for an interior. The intercanine distance in the upper arch of men was statistically greater than in women; as well as children under 12 to 20 years old, those over 21 to 35 years old. It was concluded that there was no significant correlation between intercanine distances and as more occlusions.
References
AL-KHATEEB SN, ABU ALHAIJA ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod, 2006, 76 (3): 459-465.
ANDREWS LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. American journal of Orthodontics, 1972; 62: 296-309.
ANGLE, E. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. Angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: S. S. White Manufacturing, 1907.
ARAÚJO SCCS, et al. Análise da força de mordida nos diferentes tipos de maloclusões dentárias, segundo Angle. Rev. CEFAC. 2014; 16(5):1567-1578.
BONDEVIK O. Differences between high and low angle subjects in arch form and anterior crowding from 23 to 33 years of age. Eur J Orthod, 2007; 29(4): 413-416.
BURKE SP, et al. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and post retention. Angle Orthod, 1998; 68(1): 53-60.
GUILLÉN ALE, et al. Inter-premolar width changes related to the orthodontic traction of maxillary impacted canines in adolescents and young adults: A retrospective CBCT study. Int Orthod. 2020; 28 (3): 22.
HENRIKSON J, et al. Long-term stability of dental arch form in normal occlusion from 13 to 31 years of age. Eur J Orthod, 2001; 23(1): 51-61.
INTERLANDI S. Diagrama de contorneamento ortodôntico para a técnica do arco contínuo (Straight Wire). Ortodontia, 2002; 35 (1) 91-105.
KANASHIRO LK, VIGORITO JW. Distância entre as faces vestibulares dos arcos dentários e o rebordo alveolar em diferentes tipos de oclusão. Ortodontia, 2007; 40(2): 115-124.
MARQUES JAM, et al. Estudo da distância intercanina no processo de identificação de marcas de mordidas. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent, 2005; 59: 363-6.
MASPERO C, et al. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: An assessment of arch changes on dental casts. A retrospective study. Saudi Dent J, 2020; 32(2): 93-100.
PATRICIA RR, et al. Avaliação das alterações na distância intercaninos do arco inferior em pacientes com má oclusão de Classe I tratados ortodonticamente. Rev. Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 2007; 12(2): 232-241.
PEREIRA JCM, et al. Estudo comparativo cefalométrico dos padrões dentofaciais de indivíduos portadores de oclusão normal e de más oclusões de Angle. Rev. Dental Press J Orthod, 2011; 16 (5): 62-73.
RODRÍGEZ BA, et al. Forma y tamaño del arco dental en poblaciones de tres ascendencias étnicas colomianas. Ces Odontol, 2016, 29 (2): 2032.
SÁNCHEZ RMP, et al. Arch parameters and dental discrepancy (crowding and spacing) in a sample of an Afro-Colombian population. Acta Odontol Latinoam, 2019, 32 (2): 88-96.
SHAPIRO PS. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension: treatment and post retention changes. Am J Orthod, 1974; 66(1): 58-70.
SOUSA JP, SOUSA SA. Prevalência de má oclusão em escolares de 7 a 9 anos de idade do Polo 1 da Rede Municipal de Ensino em João Pessoa-PB. Rev Odontol UNESP, 2013; 42(2): 117-123.
SWEET D. Marks from teeth as forensic evidence – the state of the art. Revista Aragonesa de Medicina Legal, 2005; 7: 91-98.
TRIVIÑO T, et al. A forma do arco dentário inferior na visão da literatura. Rev. Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 2007; 12 (6):61-72.