Keywords
Telemedicine
Active methodology
In person care
Medical education
Empathy
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the motivation and empathy manifested by medical studentsduring in person consultations and teleconsultations. Methods: 8th period medical students (n=63), from UNI-BH School, allocated to teleconsultations (n=28) and to in person consultations (n=35), were selected by convenience to participate in the study. Motivation was evaluated by conducting the Brazilian version of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS-BRV), in the thirteenth week of care. To assess the empathic behavior throughout the semester, the Jefferson scale (JSPE-vs) was used, applied in the third week and then in the thirteenth week of care. Results: Motivation was high in all dimentions of both groups. The results from empathy global score showed that, before prolongued exposure to IPC and TC, both groups were equal. After this exposure, the IPC group had superior outcomes. Conclusion: The IPC group showed greater empathy development. Both groups had high motivation scores, related to the greater empathy, during medical consultations.
References
BLANCH-HARTIGAN D, et al. Gender bias in patients' perceptions of patient-centered behaviors. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010; 80(3): 315-320.
BORUCHOVITCH E. A motivação para aprender de estudantes em curso de formação de professores. Educação, 2008; 31(1): 30-38.
BRASIL. Lei nº 14510, de 27 de dezembro de 2022. Brasília: DOU, 2022.
CARDOSO-JUNIOR A e FARIA RMD. Avaliação psicométrica do instrumento Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) em ambiente remoto de aprendizagem. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2021; 45(4): 197.
CARDOSO-JUNIOR A. Avaliação da motivação em relação a videoaulas de anatomia humana: Validação psicométrica explicação da versão brasileira do Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS-BRV) em estudantes de Medicina. Tese (Doutorado em Patologia) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), 2021.
CHEN D, et al. A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2007; 22(10): 1434-1438.
COSTA FD e AZEVEDO RCS. Empatia, relação médico-paciente e formação em medicina: um olhar qualitativo. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2010; 34(2): 261-269.
CUNHA ATR, et al. População em situação de rua: o papel da Educação Médica ante a redução de iniquidades. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2020; 44(1): 0136.
DECETY J e COWELL JM. The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2014; 18(7): 337-339.
DECETY J e ICKES WJ. The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009; 272.
DI LILLO M, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Preliminary psychometrics and group comparisons in Italian physicians. Academic Medicine, 2009; 84(9): 1198-1202.
EKMAN P. Emotions revealed: recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Times Books, 2003.
FALCONE E. Empatia. In: ABREU CN, ROSO M. (org.). Psicoterapias cognitiva e construtivista: novas fronteiras da prática clínica. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2003; 275- 287.
FILEK H, et al. Students’ experience of prison health education during medical school. Medical Teacher, 2013; 35(11): 938-943.
HAN JL e PAPPAS TN. A review of empathy, its importance, and its teaching in Surgical Training. Journal of Surgical Education, 2018; 75(1): 88-94.
HOJAT M, et al. Devil lives in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Academic Medicine, 2009; 84(11): 1182-1191.
HOJAT M, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE): development and preliminary psychometric data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001; 61(2): 349-365.
ICKES GG. Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 2000; 7(1): 95-110.
KATAOKA HU, et al. Measurement of empathy among Japanese medical students: Psychometrics and score differences by gender and level of medical education. Academic Medicine, 2009; 84(9): 1192-1197.
KELLER JM. Motivational design for learning and performance: the ARCS Model Approach. New York: Springer-Verlang, 2009.
LARA JRL, et al. Por que alguns médicos se vuelven poco éticos (malvados?) com sus pacientes? Atención Primaria, 2009; 41(11): 646-649.
LEBLANC MM. Predictable chaos: a review of the effects of emotions on attention, memory and decision making. Advances In Health Sciences Education: theory and practice, 2015; 20(1): 265-282.
MORETO G, et al. Una nueva metodologia docente en bioetica: experiencias con la aplicacion del portafolio a estudantes de medicina em Brasil. Persona y Bioetica, 2008; 2(31): 133-144.
NASCIMENTO HCF, et al. Análise dos níveis de empatia de estudantes de Medicina. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2018; 42(1): 150-158.
NATIVIDADE JC e SUCUPIRA G. A treinamento de habilidades sociais como um caminho para o Bem-Estar. Dignidade Re-Vista, 2022; 9(14): 37-50.
OLIVEIRA FA, et al. Medicina além das grades – uma Experiência da Universidade de São Paulo em Ribeirão Preto. Revista Brasileira Educação Médica, 2018; 42(4): 134-143.
PARO HB, et al. Versão brasileira da Escala de Empatia de Jefferson: propriedades psicométricas e análise fatorial. BMC Medical Education, 2012; 12: 73.
PREUSCHE I e LAMM C. Reflections on empathy in medical education: What can we learn from social neurosciences? Advances in Health Science Education, 2016; 21(1): 235-249.
RIESS K e KRAFT-TODD G. E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: a tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients. Academic Medicine, 2014; 89: 1108-1112.
SANDRINI A, et al. Educação mediada por tecnologia: avaliação de curso de treinamento em tratamento restaurador atraumático (ART): estudo piloto. Journal Health SCI Institute, 2013; 31(2): 132-135.
SANTOS LL, et al. O sistema penitenciário como um cenário de formação médica. Gac Santi, 2015; 29: 290-291.
VOGEL MH. Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking ofunder graduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 2018; 157(18): 1-7.
WARRIER V, et al. Genomic-wide meta-analysis of cognitive empathy: heritability, and correlates with sex, neuropsychiatric conditions and cognition. Molecular Psychiatry, 2018; 23:1402-1409.