Palavras-chave
Sepse
Tomada de decisão clínica
Como Citar
Copyright © | Todos os direitos reservados.
A revista detém os direitos autorais exclusivos de publicação deste artigo nos termos da lei 9610/98.
Reprodução parcial
É livre o uso de partes do texto, figuras e questionário do artigo, sendo obrigatória a citação dos autores e revista.
Reprodução total
É expressamente proibida, devendo ser autorizada pela revista.
Resumo
Objetivo: Analisar o funcionamento e a aplicação da inteligência artificial (IA) na medicina, com foco específico na abordagem da sepse, uma condição grave e de alta mortalidade. Revisão bibliográfica: A revisão evidenciou que a IA é uma ferramenta poderosa no apoio à tomada de decisões clínicas em casos de sepse. Por meio da análise de dados extraídos de prontuários eletrônicos, algoritmos treinados identificam precocemente sinais de septicemia, emitindo alertas que direcionam a equipe médica para intervenções mais rápidas e eficazes. Essa abordagem contribui para a redução da mortalidade e melhora o manejo clínico. Além disso, a IA auxilia no monitoramento contínuo do paciente e na personalização do tratamento, facilitando a estratificação de risco e a gestão clínica. Considerações finais: A pesquisa reforça a importância da inteligência artificial no avanço qualitativo da medicina. No entanto, destaca-se que a IA deve atuar como uma ferramenta complementar, mantendo o papel central e indispensável do médico no manejo da sepse.
Referências
BOUSSINA A, et al. Representation Learning and Spectral Clustering for the Development and External Validation of Dynamic Sepsis Phenotypes: Observational Cohort Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023; 25(25): e45614.
CALVERT J, et al. Using electronic health record collected clinical variables to predict medical intensive care unit mortality. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2016; 11: 52-57.
CHURPEK MM, et al. Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards. Critical care med, 2016; 44(2): 368–374.
GINESTRA JC, et al. Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning–Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock*. Critical Care Medicine, 2019; 47(11): 1477-1484.
HE J, et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine, 2019; 25(1): 30-36.
JIANG F, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Past, Present and Future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2017; 2(4): 230-243.
KRITTANAWONG C. The rise of artificial intelligence and the uncertain future for physicians. European journal of internal medicine, 2018; 48: e13–e14.
LI K, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree. Medicine, 2021; 100(19): e25813–e25817.
LIAW SY, et al. Artificial Intelligence Versus Human-controlled Doctor in Virtual Reality Simulation for Sepsis Team Training: A Randomized Controlled Study. J of Med Internet Research, 2023; 25: e47748.
MAMANDIPOOR B, et al. Machine learning predicts mortality based on analysis of ventilation parameters of critically ill patients: multi-centre validation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2021; 21(1): 152-163.
MOHAMMED A, et al. Temporal Diff-erential Expression of Physiomarkers Predicts Sepsis in Critically Ill Adults. Shock, 2021; 56(1): 58–64.
NEMATI S, et al. An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine, 2018; 46(4): 547–553.
PAN X, et al. Evaluate prognostic accuracy of SOFA component score for mortality among adults with sepsis by machine learning method. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2023; 23(1): 76–83.
SHIMABUKURO DW, et al. Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 2017; 4(1): e000234-e000241.
SONG X, et al. Clinical factors associated with rapid treatment of sepsis. PLOS ONE, 2021; 16(5): e0250923–e0250938.
TANEJA I, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a biomarker and EMR‐based machine learning algorithm for sepsis. Clinical and Translational Science, 2021; 14(4): 1578–1589.
TANSAKUL V, et al. Prediction of Sepsis and In-Hospital Mortality Using Electronic Health Records. Methods of Information in Medicine, 2018; 57(4): 185-193.
THE LANCET. Artificial intelligence in health care: within touching distance. The Lancet, 2017; 390(10114): 2739.
WANG D, et al. A Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in ICU Patients. Frontiers in Public Health, 2021; 9(9): 754348–754355.
WARDI G, et al. Predicting Progression to Septic Shock in the Emergency Department Using an Externally Generalizable Machine-Learning Algorithm. Annals of Emergency Med, 2021; 77(4): 395–406.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Sepsis. 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sepsis. Acessado em: 26 de outubro de 2024.
YIN J, et al. Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2021; 23(4): e25759.
YUAN K-C, et al. The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform, 2020; 141: 104176–104176.