The editorial process is one of the main pillars of a scientific journal’s credibility. It ensures that submitted manuscripts are evaluated with methodological rigor, impartiality, and academic responsibility.
In general, the editorial workflow begins with manuscript submission and a preliminary assessment conducted by the editorial team. At this stage, aspects such as alignment with the journal’s scope, compliance with editorial guidelines, and adherence to research ethics principles are verified.
Subsequently, the manuscript is forwarded for peer review, carried out by researchers with expertise in the study’s thematic area. The primary objective of peer review is to enhance the scientific quality of the work by providing technical assessments that may result in recommendations for revisions, clarifications, or content improvements.
The editorial decision is based on a careful analysis of these reviews, considering criteria such as originality, academic relevance, methodological consistency, and scientific contribution. This process ensures that only manuscripts aligned with the standards expected by the scientific community are published.
When conducted ethically and transparently, peer review strengthens science, builds trust in published results, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge. Therefore, understanding how the editorial process works is essential for authors, readers, and researchers.
Acervo+ recognizes peer review as a central element of scientific credibility and guides its editorial processes by methodological rigor, impartiality, and a commitment to the quality of academic production.