Abstract
Objective: Conduct a database search in order to identify scientific evidence about the benefits of massage during labor and describe and discuss the types of massage most used during labor. Methods: Integrative literature review study. Data obtained from scientific articles published in Portuguese between 2012 and 2022 were analyzed in the following databases: Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and Database on Nursing. Results: Massage is a sensory stimulation technique, which is based on touch and tissue manipulation. It provides an action that decreases the secretion of adrenaline and noradrenaline, promotes an increase in the release of endorphins and oxytocin, in addition to activating the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. Therefore, it grants the increase in blood circulation, elevation of relaxation hormones and reduction of stress hormones. Final considerations: In the present study, it was identified that the types of massage: therapeutic, Rebozo, abdominal massage, perineal massage and massage in the sacral region, generate a relevant impact on lower intensity of labor pain and on increased satisfaction with childbirth. release of endorphins and oxytocin.
References
ABDUL-SATTAR KHUDHUR ALI S, MIRKHAN AHMED H. Effect of Change in Position and Back Massage on Pain Perception during First Stage of Labor. Pain management nursing: official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2018; 19(3): 288–94.
AKKÖZ ÇEVIK S, KARADUMAN S. The effect of sacral massage on labor pain and anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 2019; 12: 17(1).
BALJON KJ, et al. Effectiveness of breathing exercises, foot reflexology and back massage (BRM) on labour pain, anxiety, duration, satisfaction, stress hormones and newborn outcomes among primigravidae during the first stage of labour in Saudi Arabia: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(6): e033844.
CAMPOS BLM, et al. A atuação da enfermagem diante da humanização do parto: uma pesquisa bibliográfica. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2022; 15(6): e10294.
DEHCHESHMEH FS, RAFIEI H. Complementary and alternative therapies to relieve labor pain: A comparative study between music therapy and Hoku point ice massage. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2015; 21(4): 229–32.
DUARTE MR, et al. Tecnologias do cuidado na enfermagem obstétrica: contribuição para o parto e nascimento. Cogitare Enfermagem, 2019; 24: e5416.
ERCOLE FF, et al. Revisão integrativa versus revisão sistemática. Revista Mineira de Enfermagem, 2014; 18(1): 9-12.
GALLO RBS, et al. Massage reduced severity of pain during labour: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy, 2013; 59(2): 109–16.
GOH YP, et al. Combined massage and warm compress to the perineum during active second stage of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2021; 155(3): 532-538.
GÖNENÇ IM, TERZIOGLU F. Effects of Massage and Acupressure on Relieving Labor Pain, Reducing Labor Time, and Increasing Delivery Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Research. 2020; 28(1): e68.
HAJIAMINI Z, et al. Comparing the effects of ice massage and acupressure on labor pain reduction. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2012; 18(3):169–72.
KARAÇAM Z, et al. The Use of Perineal Massage in the Second Stage of Labor and Follow-Up of Postpartum Perineal Outcomes. Health Care for Women International, 2012; 33(8): 697–718.
KARINO ME, FELLI VEA. Enfermagem baseada em evidências: avanços e inovações em revisões sistemáticas. Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde, 2012; 11(5).
LAI C, et al. Effectiveness of a childbirth massage programme for labour pain relief in nulliparous pregnant women at term: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2021; 27(6): 405-412.
LEAL MC, et al. Avanços na assistência ao parto no Brasil: resultados preliminares de dois estudos avaliativos. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2019; 35(7): e00223018.
LEAL NP, et al. Práticas sociais do parto e do nascer no Brasil: a fala das puérperas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiv, 2021; 26(3): 941-950.
MAFFEI MCV, et al. Uso de métodos não farmacológicos durante o trabalho de parto. Rev enferm UFPE on line, 2021; 15(1): 1-10.
MELESSE MF, et al. Cultural malpractices during labor/delivery and associated factors among women who had at least one history of delivery in selected Zones of Amhara region, North West Ethiopia: community based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2021; 21(1).
MENDES KDS, et al. Use of the bibliographic reference manager in the selection of primary studies in integrative reviews. Texto Contexto Enferm, 2019; 28.
MOHER D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 2009; 6(6).
MORTAZAVI SH, et al. Effects of massage therapy and presence of attendant on pain, anxiety and satisfaction during labor. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012; 286(1): 19–23.
OLIVEIRA LS, et al. Uso de medidas não farmacológicas para alívio da dor no trabalho de parto normal. Brazilian Journal of health Review, 2020; 3(2): 2850-2869.
PEREIRA, M, et al. Conhecimento das gestantes de uma cidade do Norte de Minas sobre os tipos e os fatores que as influenciam na escolha da via de parto. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2019; 35: e1825.
PRATA JA, et al. Tecnologias não invasivas de cuidado utilizadas por enfermeiras obstétricas: contribuições terapêuticas. Escola Anna Nery, 2021; 26.
RITTER SK, et al. Práticas assistenciais em partos de risco habitual assistidos por enfermeiras obstétricas. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 2020; 33.
SILVA TMA, et al. Significados e Práticas da equipe de Enfermagem acerca do Parto Humanizado: Uma Revisão De Literatura. Brazilian Journal of Surgery and Clinical Research - BJSCR, 2019; 26(1): 90-94.
UNALMIS ERDOGAN S, et al. Effects of low back massage on perceived birth pain and satisfaction. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2017; 28: 169–75.
