Keywords
Workflow
Computer-Aided Design
Dental materials
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: Discuss the digital flow in dentistry with a focus on 3D printing systems, types of materials used and their applicability in the dental clinic. Bibliographic review: According to the literature, the digital workflow in Dentistry through computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) occurs in a segmented way and its applicability is present in all areas of Dentistry. The main printers used are: Stereolithography (SLA), Digital Light Processing (DLP), Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) and Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). The properties of parts produced through 3D printing have been shown to be similar or superior to those produced conventionally. DLP and SLA printers are more present in the clinical routine, the type of material predominantly used are polymers and their main applications are: temporary crowns, working models, surgical guides, aligners and myorelaxing plates. Final considerations: The workflow with the application of 3D printing has several advantages for the dental clinic, improving communication with the patient, reducing the number of clinical sessions, predicting the case and improving the technique.
References
ALSHAMRANI A, et al. Effect of Printing Layer Thickness and Postprinting Conditions on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of a 3D-Printed Resin. Biomed Res Int, 2022; 2022.
BROWN G, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018; 5: 733-739.
CAMARDELLA L, et al. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models. J Orofac Orthop, 2017; 5: 394-402.
CHEN S. et al. Comparison of flexural properties and cytotoxicity of interim materials printed from mono-LCD and DLP 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent, 2021; 5: 703-708.
CHEN S. et al. A Study of 3D-Printable Reinforced Composite Resin: PMMA Modified with Silver Nanoparticles Loaded Cellulose Nanocrystal. Materials (Basel), 2018; 12: 2444.
CHERNYSHIKHIN S, et al. The Study on Resolution Factors of LPBF Technology for Manufacturing Superelastic NiTi Endodontic Files. Materials (Basel), 2022; 19: 6556.
DEEB G, et al. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017; 12: 2559.
DEHURTEVENT M, et al. Stereolithography: A new method for processing dental ceramics by additive computer-aided manufacturing. Dent Mater, 2017; 5: 477-485.
DELLA BONA A, et al. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review. Dent Mater, 2021; 2: 336-350.
DIETRICH C, et al. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies. Angle Orthod. 2017; 5: 782-787.
GRECO G, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printing of dental casts: A proposal for quality standardization. J Prosthet Dent, 2022; 6: 899-910.
GRUBER K, et al. Evaluation of Inconel 718 Metallic Powder to Optimize the Reuse of Powder and to Improve the Performance and Sustainability of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Process. Materials (Basel), 2021; 6: 1538.
JIN S, et al. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of dental models fabricated using additive manufacturing methods. Int J Comput Den, 2018; 2: 107-113.
KESSLER A, et al. Three-body wear of 3D printed temporary materials. Dental Materials, 2019; 12: 1805-1812.
KONIECZNY B, et al. Challenges of Co-Cr Alloy Additive Manufacturing Methods in Dentistry-The Current State of Knowledge (Systematic Review). Materials (Basel), 2020; 16: 3524.
LIU Y, et al. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019; 4: 1007–1014.
MOON W, et al. Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems. Materials (Basel), 2021; 6: 1487.
MUNOZ S, et al. Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns. J Prosthet Dent, 2017; 1: 89-94.
OBEROI G, et al. 3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2018; 6: 172.
OSMAN R, et al. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology? Int J Prosthodont, 2017; 2: 182-188.
REBONG R, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study. Angle Orthod, 2018; 3: 363-369.
REYMUS M, et al. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int J Comput Dent, 2019; 3: 231-237.
RIDER P. et al. Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation. Int J Mol Sci, 2018; 11: 3308.
RYU J, et al. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020; 4: 225-232.
TAHAYERI A, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater, 2018; 2: 192-200.
TAO O, et al. The Applications of 3D Printing for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering. Micromachines (Basel), 2019; 7: 480.
TAS H, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of dental casts manufactured with 3D printing technique in the All-on-4 treatment concept. J Adv Prosthodont, 2022; 6: 379-387.
TIAN Y, et al. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning, 2021; 9950131.
TSOLAKIS I, et al. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Dent J (Basel), 2022; 10: 181.
TZENG J. et al. Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Urethane Acrylate-Based 3D-Printed Denture Base Resin. Polymers (Basel), 2021; 5: 822.
WANG W, et al. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent, 2019; 2: 285-291.