Keywords
Denture partial immediate
Dental prosthesis
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the importance of immediate prosthesis on implants to improve the individual's quality of life. Bibliographic review: Restorations on implants consist of artificial teeth fixed to the implant pin, replacing one or more dental elements. In addition to the aesthetic part, it assists in mobility and speech, promoting quality of life for the individual. As far as the dental implant is concerned, the criteria for a sustainable and healthy soft tissue contour are a prosthesis that provides mechanical strength and remains aesthetically pleasing. The search for aesthetics in the rehabilitation of the edentulous ridge has become a challenge for dentists, in view of the progressive resorption of the alveolar bone, interfering with the aesthetic and functional result. Final considerations: The implant prosthesis is a safe, effective procedure that restores function and aesthetics, if indicated and performed correctly, however, it is necessary to inform patients of the advantages and disadvantages that the procedure has.
References
AGUIAR JÚNIOR FA, et al. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthodont, 2009; 18(3): 230-234.
BARBOSA GF e FEDUMENTI RA. Prótese parcial fixa sobre implante, cimentada ou parafusada? Unoesc & Ciência – ACBS, 2022; 1(2): 157-164.
BUSER D e VON T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2000; 11(1): 83-100.
CAMPI JÚNIOR L, et al. Passividade da prótese sobre implante. Innov. Implant J., 2010; 5(3): 53-59.
CHO S, et al. Fixed and removable provisional options for patients undergoing implant treatment. Comp Cont Educ Dent, 2007; 28(11): 604-8.
HANEY S e MEIERS J. In vitro study of intraoral welding procedures for pure titanium. Quintessence Int., 1996; 27(12): 841-7.
HILGENBERG SP, et al. Evaluation of Surface Physical Properties of Acrylic Resins for Provisional Prosthesis. Mat Res, 2008; 11(3): 257-60.
KARL M, et al. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs. J Prosthodont, 2006; 15(1): 20-4.
MENDONÇA RA. Biomechanics of the prothesis on implantations, cemented versus screwed. Belo Horizonte: [s.n.], 2006.
MIYAZAKI T, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental Materials Journal, 2009; 28(1): 44-56.
MOLLAOGLU N e ALPAR R. The effect of dental profile on daily functions of the elderly. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2005; 9(3): 137-140.
MORA M, et al. Software Tools and Surgical Guides in Dental-Implant-Guided Surgery. Dental Clinics of North America, 2014; 58(3): 597- 626.
MORTON D, et al. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2014; 11(29): 216-220.
NKENKE E e FENNER M. Indications for immediate loading of implants and implant success. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2006; 17(2): 19-34.
PARAGUASSU EC, et al. Qualidade de vida e satisfação em usuários de prótese total no estado do Amapá, Brasil. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2019; 27: e876.
PIMENTA MHG, et al. Moldagem em prótese sobre implante: revisão de literature. Rev Uningá, 2019; 56(5): 37-42.
POLZER I, et al. Edentulism as part of the general health problems of elderly adults. International Dental Journal, 2010; 60(3): 143-155.
ROUCK T, et al. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2009; 20(6): 566-70.
ROMERO G, et al. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent, 2000; 84(6): 602-7.
SADOWSKY S, et al. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. The Journal Of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2001; 86(5): 468-473.
SANTOS JLRB e MIRANDA JES. Análise da interface cilindro protético e intermediário com duas técnicas de fundição. Innov Implant J, 2010; 5(3): 39-47.
SCHWEIGER J, et al. Systematics and Concepts for the Digital Production of Complete Dentures: Risks and Opportunities. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 2018; 21(1): 41- 56.
SICILIA A e BOTTICELLI D. Computer-guided implant therapy and soft- and hardtissue aspects. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012; 23: 157-161.
SISSON J, et al. Conversion of a removable partial denture to a transitional complete denture: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2005; 93(5): 416-8.
TAKAHASHI T, et al. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: comparison of ball, locator, and magnet attachments. part 1. overdenture with palate. The International Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2017; 32(6): 1308-1314.
WINSTON C, et al. Retrievable cemented implant restorations. J Prosthod, 1998; 7(2): 120-125.
ZOURAS CS, et al. Dual-tray impression technique for implant retained overdentures. Imp Dent, 1995; 4(1): 57-60.