Keywords
COVID-19
Primary Health Care
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To identify in the literature how collaborative work was developed during the pandemic of COVID-19 in the context of Primary Health Care (PHC). Methods: Integrative literature review, with the purpose of synthesizing results of studies already conducted. Search conducted in PubMed, CAPES portal and BVS, with the descriptors; "primary health care"; "interprofessionality"; "COVID-19", with the Boolean operator "AND". Seventy-nine articles were found. After critical reading, using the exclusion criteria, 7 articles were obtained. Results: It was observed the notoriety of interprofessional practices in PHC in the global scenario, requiring trained professionals who work collaboratively; community-centered focus; leadership and conflict resolution in the team, consolidating the assistance provided by PHC in the pandemic. It was observed the readaptation of the service to meet the population, besides the difficulties faced by health professionals. Conclusion: There is some evidence capable of ratifying interprofessionality as an essential tool for collaborative practice, enhancing PHC in various countries, consolidating systems and networks of care to the population and promoting significant improvements in assistance.This work will contribute to the development of the systematization of the interprofessional work process, improving the care provided and favoring the proper functioning of health units.
References
ALMEIDA GN, et al. “Aprender juntos para trabalhar juntos”: competências colaborativas desenvolvidas por integrantes de um grupo tutorial do pet-saúde interprofissionalidade. Research, Society and Development. 2021;10(1): e35510111783.
AQUINO R, et al. Impact of the family health program on infant mortality in Brazilian municipalities. American journal of public health. 2009; 99(1):87–93.
BARDIN L. Manual de enfrentamento à violência contra a pessoa idosa. Brasília: Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições. 2014; 70.
BERNARDO WM, et al. A prática clínica baseada em evidências: parte II - buscando as Evidências em Fontes de Informação. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia. 2004; 44(6): 403–9.
CASTRO CP, et al. Apoio Matricial no SUS Campinas: análise da consolidação de uma prática interprofissional na rede de saúde. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2016; 21(5):1625–36.
DESBOROUGH J, et al. Australia’s national COVID ‐19 primary care response. Medical Journal of Australia. 2020; 213(3): 104.
DONNELLY C, et al. Interprofessional primary care during COVID-19: a survey of the provider perspective. BMC Family Practice. 2021; 22(1).
ESCALDA P, PARREIRA CMSF. Dimensões do trabalho interprofissional e práticas colaborativas desenvolvidas em uma unidade básica de saúde, por equipe de Saúde da Família. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação. 2018; 22(1): 1717–27.
FERNANDES SF, et al. Interprofessional work in health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2021; 55 (1).
FIFOLT M, et al. The Association of COVID-19 on Organizational Attitudes in Primary Care Among Interprofessional Practice Clinics. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management. 2022; 45(2): 95–104.
GAUTIER S, et al. Soins primaires et COVID-19 en France: apports d’un réseau de recherche associant praticiens et chercheurs. Santé Publique. 2022; 33(6): 923–34.
GIOVANELLA L, et al. A contribuição da Atenção Primária à Saúde na rede SUS de enfrentamento à Covid-19. Saúde em Debate. 2021; 44:161–76.
GOLDMAN J, XYRICHIS A. Interprofessional working during the COVID-19 pandemic: sociological insights. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020; 34(5): 1–3.
GRAY R, SANDERS C. A reflection on the impact of COVID-19 on primary care in the United Kingdom. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020; 34(5): 672–8.
KONBERG AK. Princípios da medicina baseada em evidências. Artigos de doenças na infância. 2005; 90(8): 837-40.
MEDINA MG, et al. Atenção primária à saúde em tempos de COVID-19: o que fazer? Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2020; 36(8).
OPAS. Doenças crônico-degenerativas e obesidade: Estratégia mundial sobre alimentação saudável, atividade física e saúde. 2003; 1: 60.
OUZZANI M, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016; 5(1).
PEDUZZI M, et al. Trabalho em equipe, prática e educação interprofissional. In: Clínica médica: atuação da clínica médica, sinais e sintomas de natureza sistêmica, medicina preventiva, saúde da mulher, envelhecimento e geriatria. Barueri: Manole. 2016; 1: 1043.
SILVA CRDV, et al. Digital health opportunities to improve Primary Health Care in the context of COVID-19: A Scoping Review (Preprint). JMIR Human Factors. 2021; 9(2).
SULLIVAN, E; PHILLIPS, R. Sustentando equipes de atenção primária em meio a uma pandemia. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research. 2020; 9(1): 1-3.
The Joanna Briggs Institute J. Supporting Document for the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. Joanna Briggs Institute. 2012; 18(1).
URSI ES, GAVÃO CM. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2006; 14(1): 124–31.
WHO. OMS publica Marco para Ação em Educação Interprofissional e Prática Colaborativa. ANAMT. 2023; 1: 64.