Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Assessment of skills and attitudes in medical education with active methodologies: bibliometric study
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Bibliometrics
Education
medical
Competency-based education

How to Cite

Assessment of skills and attitudes in medical education with active methodologies: bibliometric study. (2024). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 24(1), e14219. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e14219.2024

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To carry out a bibliometric study with articles that evaluated skills and attitudes in medical teaching with active methodologies. Methods: This is a bibliometric documentary study. The search for papers was carried out in the PubMed, LILACS and VHL databases during December 2022. The analysis evaluates the profile of the studies, the teaching methodologies used, the tools used for evaluation, the method, and the results. Results: 150 articles were obtained for complete analysis, the majority developed in the United States, China, and India, with a median of 107 participants. The main outcomes achieved were perception and learning, the main tool for this evaluation being the use of questionnaires. The main teaching methodology was team-based learning (TBL), the most used evaluation tool were tests (created by the authors), with validation in only 15 studies. Most studies were cross-sectional and quantitative. The most used terms after qualitative analysis of the textual corpus were "student", "doctor", "learn", "teach", "study" and "active". Final Considerations: the assessment of skills and competence in medical teaching is still a broad field for research, given the non-uniformity of the assessment, and should be further explored by the scientific community, especially in Brazil.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

BODAGH N, et al. Problem-based learning: a review. British Journal Of Hospital Medicine, 2017; 78(11): 167-170. 2.

BOULET JR e DURNING SJ. What we measure and what we should measure in medical education. Medical Education, 2018; 53(1): 86-94.

CHALLA KT, et al. Modern techniques of teaching and learning in medical education: a descriptive literature review. Mededpublish, 2021; 10(1): 1-1.

COUTO LB, et al. Formative assessment scores in tutorial sessions correlates with OSCE and progress testing scores in a PBL medical curriculum. Medical Education Online, 2019; 24(1): 1-1.

DESY JR, et al. Milestones and Millennials: a perfect pairing competency-based medical education and the learning preferences of generation Y. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2017; 92(2): 243-250.

DINKINS CS e CANGELOSI PR. Putting Socrates back in Socratic method: theory-based debriefing in the nursing classroom. Nursing Philosophy, 2019; 20(2):1-1.

ENG S e DHOLAKIA N. Action Research: A Review and Proposal for Application in Marketing Inquiry. The Qualitative Report. 2019; 24(4):754-763.

FRENCH H, et al. Perspectives: the flipped classroom in graduate medical education. Neoreviews, 2020; 21(3):150-156.

GERA M, et al. Team Based Learning Vs Problem Based Learning in Medical Education: a systematic review. Eastern Journal Of Medical Sciences, 2023; 1-6.

HARRIS N e BACON CEW. Developing Cognitive Skills Through Active Learning: a systematic review of health care professions. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2019; 14(2): 135-148.

KULKARNI P, et al. Medical education in India: past, present, and future. Apik Journal Of Internal Medicine, 2019; 7(3): 69-75.

LAKHTAKIA R, et al. Assessment as Learning in Medical Education: feasibility and perceived impact of student-generated formative assessments. Jmir Medical Education, 2022; 8(3): 1-14.

LEE GB e CHIU AM. Assessment and feedback methods in competency-based medical education. Annals Of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2022; 128(3): 256-262.

LOPES JM, et al. Self-Efficacy of Medical Students in Two Schools with Different Education Methodologies (Problem-Basead Learning versus Traditional). Rev Bras de Edu Méd, 2020; 44(2): 1-1.

MEIRELES MAC, et al. Novas Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais e a Formação Médica: expectativas dos discentes do primeiro ano do curso de medicina de uma instituição de ensino superior. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2019; 43(2):67-78.

POZZO MI, et al. Using questionnaires in research on universities: analysis of experiences from a situated perspective. Revista d’Innovacio i Recerca en Educacio, 2019; 12(2).

SAHU P. Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 2020; 1-1.

SANCHEZ‐LARA PA, et al. Thinking outside “The Box”: case-based didactics for medical education and the instructional legacy of Dr John M. Graham, Jr. American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part A, 2021;185(9): 2636-2645.

SON HT, et al. Measuring Students’ satisfaction with higher education service - An experimental study at Thainguyen University. International Journal of Business Marketing and Management, 2018; 3(4): 21-34.

THANGARAJ P. Concept of Formative assessment and Strategies for its effective implementation under Competency-Based Medical Education: A Review. National J of Res in Comm Med, 2021; 10(1): 16-24.

TRULLÀS JC, et al. Efectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Bmc Medical Education, 2022; 22(1):1-12.

WANG W. Medical education in China: progress in the past 70 years and a vision for the future. Bmc Medical Education, 2021; 21(1): 1-1.

WITHERIDGE A, et al. Revisiting Miller’s pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. International Journal Of Medical Education, 2019; 10: 191-192.

ZANGIROLAMI-RAIMUNDO J, et al. Research methodology topics: cross-sectional studies. Journal Of Human Growth And Development, 2018; 28(3): 356-360.