Keywords
Orthodontics
Malocclusion
Occlusion
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To conduct an integrative literature review to identify the occlusal indexes proposed for malocclusion assessment. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted in BVS and PubMed databases. Were used the descriptors index, orthodontics, malocclusion, and occlusion combined with the boolean operator AND. Results: A total of 1.309 studies were retrieved in the searches conducted in the databases. After analyzing the titles, abstracts, and language of the studies, 1.298 were excluded, considering the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, 11 studies were eligible and read in full. Of these, 4 more studies were added due to the analysis of the references of the selected studies. Finally, 15 studies were included in this integrative review. Final considerations: 15 occlusal indexes for the assessment of malocclusions were identified with different objectives and methodologies. Finally, it should be noted that there is no one index with universal acceptance and application, but rather the one that best applies to the orthodontist wants to analyze.
References
AGARWAL A e MATHUR R. An Overview of Orthodontic Indices. World J Dent, 2012; 3(1): 77-86.
ALHAMMADI HA, et al. Index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON) in Dubai school-aged adolescentes. APOS Trend Orthod, 2020; 10(1): 32-37.
BEDI R, et al. A study of satisfaction with dental services among adults in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J, 2005; 198(7): 433-437.
BROOK PH e SHAW WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority, Eur J Orthod, 1989; 11(3): 309-320.
BURDEN DJ, et al. Modified IOTN: an orthodontic treatment need index for use in oral health surveys. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2001; 29(3): 220-225.
CASKO JS, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998; 114(5): 589-599.
DANIELS C e RICHMOND S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod, 2000; 27(2): 149-162.
DRAKER HL. Handicapping labio-lingual deviations: A proposed index for public health purposes. Am J Orthod, 1960; 46(4): 295-305.
EXAME DA FASE II - CRITÉRIOS DE AVALIAÇÃO. Board Brasileiro de Ortodontia e Ortopedia Facial. Disponível em: https://bbo.org.br/exame-da-fase2/criterios-de-avaliacao. Acessado em: 2 de julho de 2023.
GEORGE AM, et al. Formulating a new orthodontic index: An indian board of orthodontics initiative. J In Orthod Soc, 2020; 54(2): 147-149.
GRAINGER RM. Orthodontic treatment priority index. Vital Health Statistic, 1967; 2(25): 1-49.
GRABER TM. Ortodoncia teoria y prática. Nueva Editorial Interamericana, 1977.
GRAY AS e DEMILJIAN A. lndexing occlusions for dental public health programs. Am J Orthod, 1977; 72(2): 191-197.
HONG M, et al. The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment. Korean J Orthod, 2016; 46(4): 199-211.
HOWITT JW, et al. Eastman Esthetic lndex. NY State Dent J, 1967; 33: 215-220.
IRELAND R. Oxford Dictionary of Dentistry. Oxford University Press, 2010.
KHANDAKJI MN e GHAFARI JG. Evaluation of commonly used occlusal indices in determining orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod, 2020; 42(1): 107-114.
LIEBER WS, et al. Clinical use of the ABO-Scoring Index: Reliability and subtraction frequency. Angle Orthod, 2003; 73(5): 556-564.
LITTLE, R. The irregularity index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1975; 68(5): 554-563.
LLEWELLYN SK, et al. An index of orthodontic treatment complexity. Eur J Orthod, 2007; 29(2): 186-192.
NAITO M, et al. Oral health status and health-related quality of life: a systematic review. J Oral Sci, 2006; 48(1): 1-7.
PINTO EM, et al. Análise crítica dos diversos métodos de avaliação e registro das más oclusões. Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 2008; 13(1): 82-91.
PITHON MM, et al. Os modelos ortodônticos digitais são confiáveis? Uma revisão sistemática. HU Revista, 2018; 44(1): 97-113.
PROFFIT WR, et al. Contemporary orthodontics. Elsevier/Mosby, 2013; 10-11p.
RICHMOND S, et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod, 1992; 14(2): 125-139.
RUSSELL AL. A system of classification and scoring for prevalence surveys of periodontal disease. J Dent Research, 1956; 35: 350-359.
SALZMANN JA. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. Am J Orthod, 1968; 54(10): 749-765.
SHAW WC, et al. The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995; 107(1): 1-10.
SOH CL e NARAYANAN V. Quality of life assessment in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery - A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013; 42(8): 974-980.
SUMMERS CJ. The occlusal index: A System for identifying and sconng oclusal disorders. Am J Orthod, 1971; 59(6): 552-566.
VAN KIRK LJ e PENNELL EH. Assessment of malocclusion in population groups. Am J Orthod Dental Orthop, 1959; 45(10): 752-758.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. An international methodology for epidemiological study of oral disease. 1rd ed. Geneva, 1966.
WORLD HEATH ORGANIZATION. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4rd ed. Geneva, 1997.