Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Interferential current treatment reduces low back pain and improves functionality in patients with chronic low back pain
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Functional Foods
Diet
Chronic Disease

How to Cite

Interferential current treatment reduces low back pain and improves functionality in patients with chronic low back pain. (2024). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 24(2), e14775. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e14775.2024

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the use of interferential current contributes to reducing chronic low back pain and to analyze whether the electrotherapeutic protocol can benefit the physical functionality of patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: We evaluated 24 individuals, with low back pain for more than 12 weeks and aged between 12 and 65 years. The current used in the lumbar region of the participants was of the tetrapolar interferential type and the stimulation mode was the automatic vector, with a carrier frequency of 4,000 Hz, modulation frequency (AMF) of 50 Hz and SWEEP frequency of 20Hz. Pain and functionality assessment were performed using the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Owestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) as data collection instruments, respectively. Data analysis was performed using the JAMOVI 2.2.5 software. Results: Individuals submitted to interferential current show significant improvement in pain relief, as well as in the functional pattern. Conclusion: The interferential current presents similar results in the control groups of proven efficacy, the application technique produces statistical results in the relief of chronic low back pain and in physical functionality from moderate to mild, in individuals affected by the symptoms.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ALBORNOZ-CABELLO M, et al. Effect of interferential current therapy on pain perception and disability level in subjects with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2017; 31(2): 242-249.

ALMEIDA N, et al. Immediate analgesic effect of 2KHz interferential current in chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Pain, 2019; 2(1): 27- 33.

ALMEIDA DC e KRAYCHETE DC. Low back pain - a diagnostic approach. Revista Dor, 2017; 18(02): 173-177.

ARTIOLI DP e BERTOLINI GRF. Corrente interferencial vetorial: aplicação, parâmetros e resultados. Revista Brasileira de Clínica Medica, 2012; 10: 51-6.

BERGMANN TF e PETERSON DH. Chiropractic technique. Principles and procedures. 3nd ed Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2010; 233p.

CECHINEL AK, et al. Uso da corrente aussie na dor muscular de início tardio. Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício, 2018; 12(74): 282-288.

CORRÊA JB, et al. Effects of the carrier frequency of interferential current on pain modulation and central hypersensitivity in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: Arandomized placebo-controlled trial. Europe Journal Pain, 2016; 20(10): 1653- 1666.

DOHNERT MB, et al. Estudo da eficácia da corrente interferencial em comparação à estimulação elétrica transcutânea na redução da dor lombar crônica. Revista da Dor, 2015; 16(1): 27-31.

DELITTO A, et al. Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Low back pain. Journal Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy, 2012: 42(4): 1- 57.

DUTHEY B. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World – Background. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/-medicines/areas/priority_medicines/BP6_24LBP.pdf. Acessado em: 05 de março de 2022.

GRABIAŃSKA E, et al. Comparison of the analgesic effect of interferential current (IFC) and TENS in patients with low back pain. Wiad Lek, 2015; 68(1): 13-9.

FACCI LM, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. São Paulo Medical Journal, 2011; 129(4): 206-216.

FAIRBANK JC, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physioth, 1980; 66(8): 271-273.

FRANCO YRS, et al. Does the use of interferential current prior to pilates exercisesaccelerate improvement of chronic nonspecific low back pain? Pain Management, 2018; 8(6): 465-474.

FUENTES JP, et al. Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther, 2010; 90(9): 1219-38.

GIL AC. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999; 121.

GIL AC. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007; 116.

HANSJUERGENS A. Interferential Current Clarification, Physical Therapy,1986; 66(6): 100.

IBRAMED. Manual de instruções aparelho IBRAMED SONOPULSE II. SONOPULSE IICombined Therapy - 2ª edição 05, 2011. Disponível em: https://ibramed.com.br/ultrassom/sonopulse-ii/. Acessado em: 05 de novembro de 2020.

IVETTA KM e BERTOLINI GRF. Efeitos do ΔF sobre a acomodação da corrente interferencial em sujeitos saudáveis. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 2012; 18(5): 330-332.

JOHNSON MI, TABASAM G. A single-blind investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of different swing patterns of interferential currents on cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers. Arch Phys Med Reh., 2003; 84(3): 350-7.

KANE K e TAUB A. A history of local eletrical analgesia. Pain, 1975; 1: 125-38.

KITCHEN S, BAZIN S. Eletroterapia de Clayton. 10.ed. São Paulo: Manole, 1998.

LARA-PALOMO IC, et al. Short-term effects of interferential current electro-massage in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2013; 27(5): 439-449.

LUDINGTON E e DEXTER F. Statistical analysis of total labor pain using the visual analogscale and application to studies of analgesic effectiveness during childbirth. Anesthesic Analgesic, 1998; 87(3): 723-7.

NUSBAUM L, et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire Brazil Roland-Morris. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001; 34(2): 203-10.

PEREIRA GD, et al. Efeito da corrente interferencial, 2000Hz, no limiar de dor induzida. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 2011; 17(4): 257-260.

RAJFUR J, et al. Efficacy of Selected Electrical Therapies on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Comparative Clinical Pilot Study. Medicina Science Monitor,2017;7(23): 85-100.

RACHED RDVA, et al. Lombralgia inespecífica crônica: reabilitação. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 2013; 59(6): 536-553.

ROY R, et al. Chronic pain and depression: a review. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 1984; 25(1): 96-105.

ROBINSON AJ e SNYDER-MACKLER L. Eletrofisiologia clínica: eletroterapia e teste eletrofisiológico. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2001.

ROLAND M e FAIRBANK J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000; 25(24): 3115-2447.

SILVA RMVD, et al. Efeitos da Quiropraxia em pacientes com lombalgia: uma revisão sistemática, 2012.

TULDER MV. Low back pain. Revista Best Practice & Reserach Clinical Rheumatology, 2002; 16(5): 761-75.

VASCONCELOS FH e ARAUJO GC. Prevalência de dor crônica no Brasil: estudo descritivo. Brazilian Journal Pain, 2018; 1(2): 176-179.

VIGATTO R, et al. Development of a Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Oswestry Disability.Spine, 2007; 32 (4): 481-486.

THE JAMOVI PROJECT (2021). (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org . Acessado em: 31/03/2022.

WERNERS R, et al. Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting. Spine, 1999; 24(15): 1579– 1584.