Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
The comparative use of different thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Venous Tthromboembolism
Multiple trauma
Vascular diseases

How to Cite

The comparative use of different thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients. (2024). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 24(6), e15433. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e15433.2024

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study is to compare the use of different anticoagulants in the thromboprophylaxis of patients with trauma. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane and Scopus, using only analytical or experimental observational studies from the last 10 years, following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and registered in the PROSPERO database. Results: 27 articles were included, mostly retrospective cohort studies, with trauma of an orthopedic or blunt nature, and with a higher percentage of male patients, with an average age between 40 and 60 years. The most commonly used anticoagulant was Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), and the main diagnostic method was ultrasound (USG). Finally, a better prognosis was observed with the use of HPBM when compared to other traditional medications. However, when compared to rivaroxaban, divergences were found between studies. Final considerations: In thromboprophylaxis there is a predominance of the use of heparins, and LMWH further reduces the incidence of VTE and DVT. DOACs have pharmacodynamic superiority and milder adverse effects and are thus considered good alternatives in thromboprophylaxis.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ABATZIS-PAPADOPOULOS M, et al. The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to conventional pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2023; 109(2): 1-9.

ALI I, et al. Venous thromboembolism in trauma patients with lower limb cast immobilization, associated risk reduction and complication using rivaroxaban. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2021; 190(1): 169-175.

BOO S, et al. Venous thromboembolism in a single korean trauma center: incidence, risk factors, and assessing the validity of VTE diagnostic tools. Yonsei Medical Journal 2021; 62(6): 520-527.

BURIHAN M, et al. Consenso e atualização na profilaxia e no tratamento do tromboembolismo venoso. SBACVSP, 2019.

CHOWDHURY S, ALRAWAJI F, LEENEN L. Incidence and Nature of Lower-Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Polytrauma on Thromboprophylaxis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Vascular Health and Risk Management, 2021; 17: 395-405.

CHU C, HAGA H. Venous thromboembolism associated with lower limb fractures after trauma: dilemma and management. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 2015; 20(2): 364-372.

CRUSH J, et al. Sequential low molecular weight heparin and rivaroxaban for venous thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022; 142(11): 3271-3277.

DANCHEV D, PETROV N, ZIDAROVA D. The role of LMWH in prevention of deep veins thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with severe multiple trauma. International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2013; 11(3): 17.

DOUILLET D, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with lower leg immobilization after trauma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis with meta-epsidemiological approach. PLOS Medicine, 2022; 19(7): e1004059.

DROEGE M, et al. Impact of antithrombin III and enoxaparin dosage adjustment on prophylactic anti-Xa concentrations in trauma patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized pilot trial. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2021; 52(4): 1117-1128.

ELSEBAIE M, et al. Direct oral anticoagulantes in patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of thrombosis and hemostasis, 2019; 17(4): 645-656.

FLEVAS D, et al. Thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedics: an update. EFORT open reviews, 2018; 3(4): 136-148.

FREDENBURGH J, WEITZ J. New anticoagulants: Moving beyond the direct oral anticoagulants. Journal Of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2021; 19(1): 20-29.

FU D, et al. Fondaparinux sodium and low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Chinese patients with major orthopedic surgery or trauma: a real-world study. BMC Surgery, 2022; 22(1): 1-10.

GEERTS W, et al. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1994; 331(24): S1601-S1606, supl. 6.

GOH E, et al. Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Surgery for Hip Fracture in Older Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, 2020; 11: 1-5.

GRITSIOUK Y, et al. A retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients. The American Journal of Surgery, 2014; 207(5): 648-651.

HAAC B, et al. Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma patients: A patient-centered randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 2020; 15(8): 1-13.

HAMIDI M, et al. Operative spinal trauma: Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin or a direct oral anticoagulant. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2019; 17(6): 925-933.

HAUT E, et al. Predictors of Posttraumatic Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT): Hospital Practive Versus Patient Factors – An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). The Journal of Trauma: injuty, infection, and critical care, 2009; 66(4): 994-1001.

HAYKAL T, et al. Thromboprophylaxis for orthopedic surgery; An updated meta-analysis. Thrombosis Research, 2021; 199: 43-53.

HEIT J, SPENCER F, WHITE R. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2016; 41: 3-14.

JACOBS B, et al. Unfractionated Heparin Versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma. Journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2017; 83(1).

JOHN M, et al. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Enoxaparin & Rivaroxaban for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Orthopaedic Trauma. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2022; 36(12): 615-622.

KAY A, et al. Weight-based enoxaparin dosing and deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized trauma patients: a double-blind, randomized, pilot study. Surgery, 2018; 164(1): 144-149.

KHURRUM M, et al. The survival benefit of low molecular weight heparin over unfractionated heparin in pediatric trauma patients. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2021; 56(3): 494-499.

KINGDOM L, MILLER E, SAVAGE S. The Utility of Rivaroxaban as Primary Venous Thromboprophylaxis in an Adult Trauma Population. Journal Of Surgical Research, 2019; 244: 509-515.

KRANTZ E, et al. Retrospective Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Elderly, High-Risk Trauma Patients. Journal of Surgical Research, 2020; 249: 225-231.

LONG A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus low-molecular-weight heparin therapy in patients with lower limb fractures. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2014; 38(3): 299-305.

NEDERPELT C, et al. Direct Oral Anticoagulants Are a Potential Alternative to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Trauma Patients Sustaining Lower Extremity Fractures. Journal Of Surgical Research, 2021; 258: 324-331.

NEIFERT S, et al. Lower Mortality and Morbidity with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Spine Trauma. Spine, 2020; 45(23): 1613-1618.

O’TOOLE R, et al. Prevention of Clots in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREVENT CLOT): a randomised pragmatic trial protocol comparing aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for blood clot prevention in orthopaedic trauma patients. BMJ open, 2021; 11(3): 1-9.

OLSON EL, et al. Heparin versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after trauma: A randomized noninferiority trial. Journal of Acute and Care Surgery, 2015; 79: 961-968.

ONISHI A, et al. Heparin and anticoagulation. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2016; 21(7): 1372-1392.

PAGE M, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372(71): 1-9.

PRESTI C, et al. Trombose venosa profunda diagnóstico e tratamento. Projeto diretriz SBACV, 2015; 1-35.

RUSKIN K. Deep vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism in trauma. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2018; 31(2): 215-218.

SAMUEL S, et al. Enoxaparin may be associated with lower rates of mortality than unfractionated heparin in neurocritical and surgical patients. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2023; 55(3): 439-448.

SHIQING W, et al. Efficacy of low molecular weight heparin in spinal trauma patients after part concentrated screw surgery and its influence on blood parameters and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis. Medical hypotheses, 2019; 132: 1-5.

SILVA L, et al. Análise retrospectiva da prevalência e do perfil epidemiológico dos pacientes vítimas de trauma em um hospital secundário. Revista de Medicina, 2017; 96(4): 246-254.

STEVENS SM, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Second Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. CHEST, 2021; 160: 545-608.

TRAN A, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low Molecular Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery, 2022; 275(1): 19-28.