Abstract
Objective: To examine publications on teacher-student interaction in medical education. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in five stages: a) formulation of the research question; b) identification of relevant studies in various databases; c) selection of studies; d) data organization; e) summary and synthesis of results. The databases consulted were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and SciELO, in the years 2016 - 2022. The research was registered in the PROSPERO international database (CRD 42020177029). Results: In the first search, 934 articles were found. After filtering out duplicates, 476 studies remained, whose titles and abstracts were analyzed. Twenty-one articles remained for analysis of the full text. Of these, 11 studies were included in this review because they met all the eligibility criteria of the proposed protocol. Final considerations: There is no consensus on what teacher-student interaction means in medical teaching. Students attach great value to the relationships they establish with their teachers, even when educational institutions use active teaching methods. The role of the teacher as a facilitator in the learning process provides secure guidance for dealing with the knowledge that the student acquires in this process. The interaction between teachers and students seems to change significantly throughout the course.
References
BELFOR JA, et al. Competências pedagógicas docentes sob a percepção de alunos de medicina de universidade da Amazônia brasileira. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2018; 23(1): 73-82.
BERNARDO WM, et al. A prática clínica baseada em evidências: parte II - buscando as Evidências em Fontes de Informação. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, 2004; 44(6): 403–409.
BEZERRA KKS, et al. Metodologias ativas no contexto do ensino médico no Brasil. ID on line Revista de Psicologia, 2020; 14(51): 393-407.
DEMIRKAYA PN e BAKKALOĞLU H. Examining the student-teacher relationships of children both with and without special needs in preschool classrooms. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2015; 15(1): 159-176.
EASTON G. How medical teachers use narratives in lectures: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 2016; 16(1): 3.
HENRIQUES BL, et al. Four Corners: an educational strategy for learning infectious diseases in medical school. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2021; 45(3): 1-5.
JAYASURIYA-ILLESINGHE V, et al. Role models and teachers: medical students’ perception of teaching-learning methods in clinical settings, a qualitative study from Sri Lanka. BMC Medical Education, 2016; 16(1): 52.
KEIFENHEIM KE, et al. Teaching history taking to medical students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 2015; 15(1): 159.
KRALOVA E. Ethical issues in the teacher and the student relationship. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2018; 5(3): 30-35.
KULAYLAT AN, et al. Perceptions of mistreatment among trainees vary at different stages of clinical training. BMC Medical Education, 2017; 17(1): 14.
LEVAC D, et al. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 2010; 5(69): 1-9.
LI L e YANG S. Exploring the influence of teacher-student interaction on university students’ self-efficacy in the flipped classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 2021: 10(2): 84.
LOW MJW, et al. Cross-sectional study of perceptions of qualities of a good medical teacher among medical students from first to final year. Singapore Medical Journal, 2020; 61(1): 28-33.
MACKIN R, et al. The hidden curriculum: A good thing? Cureus, 2019; 11(12): 10-14.
MALEKI F, et al. Investigating the influence of teachers’ characteristics on the teacher-student relations from students’ perspective at Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2017; 11(6): JC04-JC08.
MENDES KDS, et al. Revisão Integrativa: Método de pesquisa para incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Revista Texto e Contexto Enferm, 2008; 17(4): 758-764.
MENEZES DPF, et al. Peer mentoring como estratégia de acolhimento ao estudante e adaptação ao método PBL. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2021; 45(1): 1-6.
QUIN D. Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement. Review of Educational Research, 2017; 87(2): 345-387.
SCHEI E, et al. Trustingly bewildered. How first-year medical students make sense of their learning experience in a traditional, preclinical curriculum. Medical Education Online, 2018; 23(1): 1500344.
SHARMA SK, et al. Dwindling attendance of undergraduate medical students, reasons and possible solutions. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2021; 10(3): 148-152.
SILVEIRA GL, et al. “Speed up”! The Influences of the hidden curriculum on the professional identity development of medical students. Health Professions Education, 2019; 5(3): 198-209.
TRICCO AC, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2018: 169(7): 467-473.
VERITAS HEALTH INNOVATION. Covidence systematic review. Melbourne, Austrália. Disponível em: www.covidence.org. Acessado em: 30 de outubro de 2023.
VOGEL D, et al. Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 2018; 18(1): 157.
WEIDMAN JC. Socialization of students in higher education: organizational perspectives. Em: The SAGE Handbook for Research in Education. [s.l.]: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2006; 252-262.
YAZDANI S, et al. A comprehensive model of hidden curriculum management in medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2019; 7(3): 123-130.
