Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Population resistance to vaccines against Covid-19
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Vaccine hesitancy
COVID-19
Vaccination resistance

How to Cite

Population resistance to vaccines against Covid-19. (2024). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 24(8), e16123. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e16123.2024

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the scientific literature that deals with population resistance to COVID-19 immunizers. Methods: Integrative Literature Review. The search took place from September to October 2023. In the databases: LILACS; CINAHL; SCOPUS and Web of Science. Correlating with the health sciences descriptors (DeSC) and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH). In order to evaluate the studies found, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in the selection of 8 related articles to construct the review's knowledge synthesis. Results: it was noticed that socioeconomic, political, religious aspects and above all, the degree of (mis)information are significant mediators in vaccine resistance and hesitancy, reaching unprecedented levels due to the fake news infodemic, as conspiratorial and controversial information provokes greater engagement and audience – valuable currencies in cyberspace. Conclusion. Furthermore, even though a portion of the population expresses a clamor for the vaccine against COVID-19. Final considerations: it was possible to see that this hesitant and resistant behavior is reinforced and reaches unprecedented levels due to the fake news infodemic. Therefore, there is a noticeable need to develop more studies that offer scientific support for the information disclosed.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

AL-UQDAH L, et al. Associations Between Social Media Engagement and Vaccine Hesitancy. Journal Community Health, 2022; 4: e345.

BARDIN L. Análise de conteúdo. 1ed- São Paulo: Edições: 2011; 70.

BELTRÃO RPL, et al. Perigo do movimento antivacina: análise epidemio-literária do movimento antivacinação no Brasil. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2020; 12: e63453.

CARDOSO NA, et al. Educação em saúde: uma estratégia essencial para a aceitação da vacinação contra a COVID-19. Revista dos Seminários de Iniciação Científica, 2022; 4(1): 86-87.

CARUSO F e MARQUES AJ. Ensaio sobre negação científica em tempos de pandemia. Pesquisa, Sociedade e Desenvolvimento, 2021; 10: 11.

CASTRO-NUNES P e RIBEIRO GR. Equidade e vulnerabilidade em saúde no acesso às vacinas contra a COVID-19. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 2023; 46: e31.

COUTO MT, et al. Considerações sobre o impacto da Covid-19 na relação indivíduo-sociedade: da hesitação vacinal ao clamor por uma vacina. Saúde e Sociedade, 2021; 30: 1-11.

DE ARAÚJO FILHO FJ, et al. Fatores que influenciam na adesão de idosos à vacina contra covid-19: Revisão de escopo. Nursing, 2023; 26: 39926-9931.

GALHARDI CP, et al. Fake news e hesitação vacinal no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2022; 27: 1849-1858.

HASSEN HD, et al. Understanding determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy; an emphasis on the role of religious affiliation and individual’s reliance on traditional remedy. BMC Public Health, 2022; 22: 1-11.

LEE SK, et al. Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific Reports, 2022; 12: 1-11.

MELNYK BM e FINEOUT-OVERHOLT E. Making the Case for Evidence-Based Practice. 2ª Edição, Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, Filadélfia, 2011; 4: 3-24.

MENDES KDS, et al. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto -Enfermagem, 2008; 17: 758-764.

PAGE MJ, et al. O comunicado do PRISMA 2020: uma diretriz atualizada para a notificação de revisões sistemáticas. BMJ, 2021; 2: 372.

PIERRI F, et al. Online misinformation is linked to early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal. Scientific Reports, 2022; 12:1-7.

ROSHCHINA Y, et al. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Russia. 2022; 40: 5739-5747.

ROSHCHINA Y, et al. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Russia. Vaccine, 2022; 0: 5739-5747.

SANTOS ES, et al. Conceito de saúde em tempos de epidemia/pandemia: Revisão de literatura. Brazilian Journal of Development, 2021; 7: e56.

VASCONCELLOS-SILVA PR e CASTIEL LD. COVID-19, as fake news e o sono da razão comunicativa gerando monstros: a narrativa dos riscos e os riscos das narrativas. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2020; 36: e3456.

VIGNOLI RG, et al. Movimento antivacina e hesitação vacinal na covid-19: reflexões e percepções para a ciência da informação. Informação & Informação, 2022; 27: 457-484.

ZHU N, et al. Um novo coronavírus de paciente com pneumonia na China, 2019. N Engl J Med, 2020; 382; e456