Keywords
Physical properties
Root canal filling
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the flow capacity and compressive resistance of endodontic filling cements: AH Plus, Endofill, Sealer 26 and N-Rickert. Methods: Laboratory and quantitative study, divided into two stages. Data collection obtained through measurements of the diameter of the discs formed by the cements, using a digital caliper, carried out at times of 10, 20, 30 and 60 minutes, 24 and 48 hours. For compressive strength, in accordance with ISO 6876/2012, specimens were measured using a universal testing machine immediately after setting, at 24 hours and 30 days. Results: Sealer 26 cement obtained the best result, the only statistical difference was observed in the time of 10 minutes compared to Endofill cement, which presented the worst. In terms of compressive strength, Sealer 26 also had better performance and after 30 days, AH Plus cement had the highest average and N-Rickert cement the worst. Conclusion: Sealer 26 had better flow and the presented compressive strength values were favorable to the standards established by ISO 6876/2012.
References
AL-HADDAD A e CHE AB AZIZ ZA. Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. International journal of biomaterials, 2016.
ALONSO FS, et al. Análise comparativa do escoamento de dois cimentos endodônticos: Endofill e AH plus. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde/Brazilian Journal of Health Research. 2005; 7(1): 48-54.
ANSI/ADA. American National Standard. American Dental Association. Specification nº 57 for endodontic sealing materials. Disponível em: https ://engage.ada.org/p/eg/ansiada-standard-no-57-for-endodontic-sealing-materials-e-book-1339.
BAGHDADI I, et al. Investigation of the structure and compressive strength of a bioceramic root canal sealer reinforced with nanomaterials. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. 2021; 19: 228080002110147.
CHEN Z. Difficulties and misunderstandings of root canal filling. Hua xi kou Qiang yi xue za zhi= Huaxi Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi= West China Journal of Stomatology. 2017; 35(3): 232-238.
CINTRA LTA, et al. Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity and Biocompatibility of New Resin Epoxy–based Endodontic Sealer Containing Calcium Hydroxide. Journal of Endodontics. 2017; 43(12): 2088–92.
COELHO GF, et al. Cimentos endodônticos a base de óxido de zinco e eugenol e cimentos a base de resina epóxica: propriedades que contribuem para o sucesso da endodontia. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia. 2012; 69(1): 8-14.
ELDENIZ AU e ØRSTAVIK D. Physical properties of newly developed root canal sealers. International Endodontic Journal. 2005; 38(12): 935.
FARAONI G, et al. Avaliação comparativa do escoamento e tempo de presa do cimento MTA Fillapex®. Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia-UPF. 2013; 18(2): 180-184.
FERREIRA FBA, et al. Radiopacidade de cimentos endodônticos avaliada pelo sistema de radiografia digital. Rev. Fac. Odontol. Bauru. 1999; 7(1/2): 55-60.
GROSSMAN LI. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod. 1976; 2(6): 166-75.
GUINESI AS. quanm. Dissertação (Pós-Graduação em Endodontia) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, 2008, 94.
ISO. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. 6876: Dentistry – Root Sealing Materials,2012. Disponívelem :https ://www.iso.org/standard/45117.html#:~:text=ISO%206876%3A2012%20specifies%20requirements,aid%2
of%20obturating%20points%2Fcones.
KOPPER PMP, et al. Avaliação, in vitro, da atividade antimicrobiana de três cimentos endodônticos. Rev Odonto Ciência. 2007; 22(56): 106-11.
LIANG YH e YUE L Root canal treatment: key motions and targets of root canal instrumentation. Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi= Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi= Chinese journal of stomatology. 2019; 54(9): 646-648.
LUCKMANN G, et al. Etiologia dos insucessos dos tratamentos endodônticos. Vivências. 2013; 9(16): 133-139.
MCCOMB D e SMITH DC. Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate-based and conventional root canal sealers. J Endod. 1976; 2: 228-35.
NASCIMENTO MT, et al. Análise comparativa do escoamento de dois cimentos endodônticos: uma revisão integrativa. Journal Orofacial Investigation. 2018; 5(1): 29-34.
ØRSTAVIK D. Physical properties of root canal sealers: measurement of flow, working time, and compressive strength. Int Endod J. 1983; 16: 99-107.
ØRSTAVIK DAG. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing. Endodontic topics. 2005; 12(1): 25-38.
RAYMUNDO A, et al. Análise radiográfica do preenchimento de canais laterais por quatro diferentes técnicas de obturação. RSBO Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia. 2005; 2(2): 22-2.
SCELZA MFZ, et al. Estudo comparativo das propriedades de escoamento, solubilização e desintegração de alguns cimentos endodônticos. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2006; 6(3): 243-247.
SCHUSTER CD. Cimento endodôntico à base de resina epóxi Sealer Plus: Avaliação do Ph e escoamento, 2017.
STANKIEWICZ A, et al., Avaliação das propriedades do cimento de óxido de zinco e isoeugenol. Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia De Porto Alegre. 2000; 41(2): 14–20.
TORRES IG, et al. Capacidade de escoamento dos cimentos endodônticos AH Plus e Endofill. 2016; 2-13.
VERTUAN GC, et al. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer. Journal of endodontics. 2018; 44(3): 501-505.
WEISMAN MIA. Study of the flow rate of ten root canal sealers. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology. 1970; 29(2): 255–261.