Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the professor’s perspective about neurophobia in medical undergraduate education, identifying risk factors and coping strategies. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study, with qualitative-quantitative approach, with 35 professors of a medical school, in Belém-Pará. Results: Most professors (88,6%) notice neurophobia in students, with the 2nd semester having the highest incidence (41,2%) and the 6th having the highest prevalence (41,2%). For 70,6% of professors, it is common to hear from students that they are unable to learn neurology, with the influence of veterans, the complexity of neuroanatomy/physiology and the distance between theory and practice being the main risk factors. Manifestations of neurophobia in students are perceived in the following areas: emotional, performance and language (verbal or not), being a moderate to severe problem for 70,6%. Curriculum review, diversification of teaching methodologies and pedagogical support measures were the main suggestions for combating neurophobia. Conclusion: In the professor’s perception, neurophobia in medical undergraduate course is strongly present, appearing in the first contact with the teaching of neurosciences and special relating to factors such as the complexity of neuroanatomy/physiology and the influence of veterans. Curriculum review, use of different methodologies and pedagogical reinforcement are necessary measures to combat neurophobia.
References
ABUSHOUK AI, DUC NM. Curing neurophobia in medical schools: evidence-based strategies. Med Educ (Online), 2016; 21(1).
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. 70 ed. Lisboa: [s.n.], 1977.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde Uma análise da situação de saúde e das doenças e agravos crônicos: desafios e perspectivas. Brasília, 2019. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_brasil_2018_analise_situacao_saude_doencas_agravos_cronicos_desafios_perspectivas.pdf . Acessado em: 29 ago. 2021.
CALDATO MCF, et al. Manual do módulo IV – Sistema Nervoso. 30 ed. Belém: CESUPA. 2022a; 31p.
CALDATO MCF, et al. Manual do módulo XVII – Mente e Cérebro. 27 ed. Belém: CESUPA. 2022b; 72p.
CALDATO MCF, et al. Projeto Pedagógico do Curso de Medicina. CESUPA. Belém. 2023; 91 p.
CHANGIZ T, et al. Curriculum management/monitoring in undergraduate medical education: a systematized review. BMC med educ, 2019; 19(1): 1-9.
CUOCO JA. Medical students neurophobia: a review of the current pandemic and proposed educational solutions. Eur j educ sci, 2016; 3(3): 41-46.
FANTANEANU TA, et al. Neurophobia inception: a study of trainees' perceptions of neurology education. Can j neurol sci, 2014; 41(4): 421-429.
HERNANDO-REQUEJO V. Neurophobia: why, how much, consequences and solutions. MedEdPublish, 2020; 9(3): 3.
JOZEFOWICZ RF. Neurophobia: the fear of neurology among medical students. Arch. Neurol. 1994; 51(4): 328-329.
LIMA GLDO. A neurofobia nos estudantes de medicina da UFRN: um estudo com métodos mistos. Dissertação de Mestrado. Centro de ciências da saúde: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal. 2019. 71p.
MANTOVANI CML. Neurofobia: impactos na saúde e estratégias para a prevenção. Sorocaba, Rev. fac. ciênc méd Sorocaba, 2020; 22(2): 86–87.
MARANHÃO-FILHO P. The healthy concern to improve neurological teachings. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatri, 2014;72: 743-744.
MCGOVERN E, et al. NeuroQ: A neurophobia screening tool assesses how roleplay challenges neurophobia. J. Neurol Sci, 2021; 421.
MINAYO MCS. Análise qualitativa: teoria, passos e fidedignidade. Ciênc Saúde Colet, 2012; 17: 621-626.
RODRIGUES A N, et al. Education research: monitoring and tracking neurophobia - evidence from a temporal analysis of brazilian medical schools. Neurology Educ, 2023; 2(3).
ROZE E et al. ‘The MOVE’, a innovative simulation-based education program using roleplay to teach neurological semiology: students and teachers perceptions. Rev Neurol (Paris), 2016; 172(4-5): 289-94.
SAFDIEH JE, et al. Core curriculum guidelines for a required clinical neurology experience. Neurology, 2018; 92(13): 619-626.
SANDRONE S, et al. Neurologic and neuroscience education. Neurology Educ, AAN, 2019; 92(4).
SANTOS-LOBATO BL, et al. Neurophobia in Brazil: detecting and preventing a global issue. Rev bras educ med, 2018; 42(1): 121-128.
SANTOS-LOBATO BL, et al. There is no shortage, but inequality: demographic evolution of neurologists in Brazil (2010-2020). Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2023; 81(2): 134-145.
SANTOS-LOBATO BL, PONTES-NETO OM. Shortage of neurologists in the Brazilian Amazon. Neurology, 2015; 85(19): 1710-1711.
SCHEFFER M, et al. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2023. São Paulo, SP: FMUSP, AMB, 2023; 344p.
SCHON F, et al. Is clinical neurology really so difficult? J Neuro Neurosurg Psychiatr, 2002; 72: 557-59.
SHELLEY BP, et al. Preventing “neurophobia”: Remodeling neurology education for 21st-century medical students through effective pedagogical strategies for “neurophilia”. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2018 21(1): 9-18.
SHIELS L, et al. Medical student attitudes and educational interventions to prevent neurophobia: a longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ,2017; 17(1): 1-7.
SOARES AS, et al. Neurofobia em uma escola médica privada: prevalência e consequências no processo ensino-aprendizagem. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2020; 12(12): e4949.
SOLORZANO GE e JÓZEFOWICKZ RF. Neurophobia: a chronica disease of medical students. Neurology, 2015; 85(2).
TAROLLI CG e JÓZEFOWICKZ RF. Curriculum innovations: Enhancing Medical Student Neuroscience Training with a Team-Based Learning curriculum. Neurology Educ, 2023; 2.
VALENTE DA, et al. Neurophobia in Brazil: a literature rewiew. Paulista de neurologia, 2023; 141(1): 67.
WIJNEN-MEIJER M, et al. Vertical integration in medical education: the broader perspective. BMC med educ, 2020; 20.
YANG Y, et al. Factors influencing subspecialty choice among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 2019; 9(3): e022097.
