Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of the flipped classroom in the morphophysiological health sciences. Methods: Using the descriptive method as an instrument, with qualitative prevalence, this study, through transversality and with a sample of students from blended courses, reflects responses to a questionnaire, developed in the second semester of 2023. Results: Students aged between 18 and 43 years participated in the study, and it was reported by a good part of the participants that they have doubts about learning and, when the concepts are approached, they presented an inconclusive perception. Most are in favor of the use of the flipped classroom only after face-to-face learning of basic morphophysiological conceptualizations. Conclusion: The students presented difficulties in conceptualizing the flipped classroom and most of them have low acceptance of the adopted methodology. When it comes to the students' training process, they suggest that morphophysiological concepts be addressed in person in the first periods of graduation.
References
AUSEBEL DP. Aquisição e retenção de conhceimentos: uma perspectiva cognitive. Lisboa: Plátano, 2003.
CHIKEME PC, et al. Self-directed learning readiness and learning achievements of a flipped classroom model approach in research methods class: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Edc Pract, 2024: 77: 103968.
EL SADIK A e AL ABDULMONEM W. Improvement in Student Performance and Perceptions through a Flipped Anatomy Classroom: Shifting from Passive Traditional to Active Blended Learning. Anat Sci Educ, 2021; 14(4): 482-490.
ELZAINY A e SADIK AE. The impact of flipped classroom: Evaluation of cognitive level and attitude of undergraduate medical students. Ann Anat, 2022; 243: 151952.
DAVIDA W, et al. A Aprendizagem Cooperativa Retorna às Faculdades Qual é a Evidência de que Funciona? Smith in Change, 1998; 30(4): 2.
GLASER B. Fazendo Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados: Questões e Discussões. — Editora Sociologia, 1998.
HUGHES KN, et al. Application of the Flipped Classroom Approach in an Undergraduate Maternal-Newborn Nursing Course to Improve Clinical Reasoning. Creat Nurs, 2022; 28(1): 48-53.
HOWARD GA, et al. The challenges, strategies and reading habits of university students with a history of reading difficulties and their relationship with academic performance. J Aprenda Disabil., 2024; 57(2): 91-105.
INGLIS S. Developing a Flipped Classroom for Clinical Anatomy: Approaches to Pre-class Recordings and a Novel Approach to In-Class Active Learning. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2023; 1431: 17-34.
JOHNSON DW E JOHNSON RT. Cooperation in the classroom. Edinea, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1989.
JOSEPH MA, et al. Flipped classroom improves Omani nursing students performance and satisfaction in anatomy and physiology. BMC Nurs, 2021; 20(1): 1.
MALOY J, et al. Alluring Details in the Flipped Classroom: The Impact of Interesting but Educationally Irrelevant Information on Student Learning and Motivation. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2019; 18(3): ar42.
MAROJA TP, et al. O uso de grupos de discussão na avaliação formative do laboratório morfofuncional de uma instituição de Ensino superior da Amazônia. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2019; 36: e1990.
MEIHY JCSB e HOLANDA F. História oral: como fazer, como pensar. São Paulo: Contexto, 2007.
NG EKL. Invertida versus sala de aula tradicional e desempenho do aluno e engajamento cognitivo em um curso fundamental de enfermagem de grau associado. Enfermeira Educ Pract, 2023; 68: 103567.
OUDBIER J, et al. Enhancing the efectiveness of fipped classroom in health science education: a stateof-the-art review. BMC Medical Education, 2022; 22: 34.
OSTERMANN F e CAVALCANTE CJH. Teoria da aprendizagem. Porto Alegre: Evangraf. UFRGS, 2011.
PARREIRA DC, et al. A metodologia ativa, a aprendizagem significativa e sala de aula invertida. Revista Ilustração, 2023; 4(2): 9–14.
RABELO P e NICACIO RT. Origens históricas da sala de aula invertida. Revista Multiatual, 2024; 5(2): 44-54.
RATHNER JA e SCHIER M.A. The impact of flipped classroom andragogy on student assessment performance and perception of learning experience in two advanced physiology subjects. Adv Physiol Educ, 2020; 44: 80–92.
RODRIGUES RC, et al. The importance on the use of active methods when teaching human morphophysiology. Adv Physiol Educ, 2021; 45(3): 568-574.
SOUZA JBN. Uma experimentação com metodologia ativa: sala de aula invertida como modelo para o ensino de probabilidade. Revista Eletrônica de matemática (REVEMAT), 2020; 15(2): 1-23.
STRAUSS A e CORBIN J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
VYGOTSKY LS. Pensamento e linguagem. São Paulo: Livraria Martins Fontes, 1998. (2aed.).
VYGOTSKY LS. Aprendizado e desenvolvimento: um processo sócio-histórico. São Paulo: Scipione, 1997.
YOUHASAN P, et al. Developing and evaluating an educational web-based tool for health professions education: the Flipped Classroom Navigator. BMC Med Educ., 2022; 22(1): 594.
YOUHASAN P, et al. Percepções de professores universitários sobre a prontidão para a pedagogia da sala de aula invertida no ensino de graduação em enfermagem: um estudo qualitativo. J Prof Enfermagem, 2022; 41: 26-32.
ZEM F, et al. Opinião dos estudantes da área da saúde sobre a utilização de metodologias ativas no ensino remoto de fisiologia humana. Espaço para a Saúde
