Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Assessment of quality of life related to patients using Branemark protocol prosthesis
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Quality of life
Edentulous arch
Dental implants
Oral rehabilitation

How to Cite

Assessment of quality of life related to patients using Branemark protocol prosthesis. (2024). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 24(12), e17590. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e17590.2024

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of life of patients rehabilitated with the Branemark protocol using a questionnaire adapted from the Whoqol bref. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 11 individuals using a Branemark protocol type prosthesis, of both genders aged between 50 and 67 years. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a questionnaire adapted from the Whoqol-Bref was individually applied. consisting of four domains: psychological, personal relationships, environment and physical and the qualitative quantitative data collected were analyzed using descriptive and percentage statistics. Results: Among the 11 individuals, all were residents of the city of Belém, the majority of the population was female 8/11 (72.2%), with an average age of 57.2 years, in terms of education 5/11 (45.4%) had secondary education complete and marital status, the majority were married or divorced, 5/11 (45.4%) respectively. The level of patient satisfaction was considered high, at 11/11 (100%). Analyzing the domains mentioned, the one with the lowest satisfaction rate was the environment. Conclusion: The Branemark protocol had a positive impact on the quality of life of the evaluated patients, being essential in maintaining satisfactory life rates.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ALI Z, et al. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthodontic treatment for patients with partial edentulism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2019; 121: 59-68.

AMIN MF, et al. Assessment of quality of life and its determinants in type-2 diabetes patients using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument in Bangladesh. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 2022; 22: 162-166.

AZAMI-AGHDASH S, et al. Oral Health and Related Quality of Life in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2021; 50: 689-700.

BĂJENARU L, et al. Latent profile analysis for quality of life in older patients. BMC Geriatrics, 2022; 22: 848-852.

BUSER D, et al. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 2017; 73: 7-21.

DE MEDEIROS MMD, et al. Does the institutionalization influence elderly's quality of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 2020; 20: 44-50.

DIKICIER S, et al. Health-related quality of life in edentulous patients. Journal of Medicine and Life, 2021; 14: 683-689.

EL OSTA N, et al. Comparison of psychometric properties of GOHAI, OHIP-14, and OHIP-EDENT as measures of oral health in complete edentulous patients aged 60 years and more. Quality of Life Research, 2021; 30: 1199-1213.

EL OSTA N, et al. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012, 30: 131-138.

FONTEYNE E, et al. Four-implant-supported overdenture treatment in the maxilla. Part II: Speech- and oral health-related quality of life in patients with implant-supported overdentures in the maxilla-A prospective 3-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2021; 23: 680-691.

GAU BS, et al. Clinical applicability of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) to mothers of children with asthma in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010; 19: 811-819.

GHOLAMI A, et al. Application of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) to patients with cataract. Epidemiology and Health, 2016; 4: 2016005.

GONÇALVES GSY, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022; 26: 83-94.

GÖTHBERG C, et al. Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2018; 20: 313-321.

HASSEL AJ, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of elderly Germans--comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14. Community Dental Health Journal, 2010; 27: 242-247.

ILIĆ I, et al. Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire in Medical Students. Medicina, 2019; 55: 772-784.

JEMT T, et al. Incidence of surgery related to problems with peri-implantitis: a retrospective study on patients followed up between 2003 and 2010 at one specialist clinic. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015, 17: 209-220.

JIKAMO B, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Sidamic version of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-Bref Scale measuring the quality of life of women with severe preeclampsia in southern Ethiopia, 2020. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2021; 19: 239-245.

KIM HY, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module. Geriatric Nursing, 2021; 42: 548-554.

LOCKER D, et al. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2001; 29: 373-381.

MARTINS AMC, et al. The effect of complete dentures on edentulous patients' oral health-related quality of life in long-term: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Research Journal, 2021; 18: 65-71.

PASSIA N, et al. Influence of the number of implants in the edentulous mandible on chewing efficacy and oral health-related quality of life-A within-subject design study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2022; 33: 1030-1037.

RIVA F, et al. Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: A systematic review. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2022; 50: 333-338.

SANTUCCI D, et al. Development of a Maltese version of oral health-associated questionnaires: OHIP-14, GOHAI, and the Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2014; 27: 44-49.

SARTORETTO SC, et al. Effectiveness of Supportive Care in the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases in Brånemark Protocol Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2022; 42: 217-223.

SHARKA R, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: An umbrella systematic review. Gerodontology, 2019; 36(3): 195-204.

SOUZA JÚNIOR EV, et al. Relationship between family functionality and the quality of life of the elderly. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021; 75: 20210106.

ZAHED M, et al. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Liver Failure Patients Measured by OHIP-14 and GOHAI. BioMed Research International, 2020; 26: 8835824.