Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of life of patients rehabilitated with the Branemark protocol using a questionnaire adapted from the Whoqol bref. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 11 individuals using a Branemark protocol type prosthesis, of both genders aged between 50 and 67 years. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a questionnaire adapted from the Whoqol-Bref was individually applied. consisting of four domains: psychological, personal relationships, environment and physical and the qualitative quantitative data collected were analyzed using descriptive and percentage statistics. Results: Among the 11 individuals, all were residents of the city of Belém, the majority of the population was female 8/11 (72.2%), with an average age of 57.2 years, in terms of education 5/11 (45.4%) had secondary education complete and marital status, the majority were married or divorced, 5/11 (45.4%) respectively. The level of patient satisfaction was considered high, at 11/11 (100%). Analyzing the domains mentioned, the one with the lowest satisfaction rate was the environment. Conclusion: The Branemark protocol had a positive impact on the quality of life of the evaluated patients, being essential in maintaining satisfactory life rates.
References
ALI Z, et al. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthodontic treatment for patients with partial edentulism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2019; 121: 59-68.
AMIN MF, et al. Assessment of quality of life and its determinants in type-2 diabetes patients using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument in Bangladesh. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 2022; 22: 162-166.
AZAMI-AGHDASH S, et al. Oral Health and Related Quality of Life in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2021; 50: 689-700.
BĂJENARU L, et al. Latent profile analysis for quality of life in older patients. BMC Geriatrics, 2022; 22: 848-852.
BUSER D, et al. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 2017; 73: 7-21.
DE MEDEIROS MMD, et al. Does the institutionalization influence elderly's quality of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 2020; 20: 44-50.
DIKICIER S, et al. Health-related quality of life in edentulous patients. Journal of Medicine and Life, 2021; 14: 683-689.
EL OSTA N, et al. Comparison of psychometric properties of GOHAI, OHIP-14, and OHIP-EDENT as measures of oral health in complete edentulous patients aged 60 years and more. Quality of Life Research, 2021; 30: 1199-1213.
EL OSTA N, et al. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012, 30: 131-138.
FONTEYNE E, et al. Four-implant-supported overdenture treatment in the maxilla. Part II: Speech- and oral health-related quality of life in patients with implant-supported overdentures in the maxilla-A prospective 3-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2021; 23: 680-691.
GAU BS, et al. Clinical applicability of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) to mothers of children with asthma in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010; 19: 811-819.
GHOLAMI A, et al. Application of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) to patients with cataract. Epidemiology and Health, 2016; 4: 2016005.
GONÇALVES GSY, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022; 26: 83-94.
GÖTHBERG C, et al. Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2018; 20: 313-321.
HASSEL AJ, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of elderly Germans--comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14. Community Dental Health Journal, 2010; 27: 242-247.
ILIĆ I, et al. Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire in Medical Students. Medicina, 2019; 55: 772-784.
JEMT T, et al. Incidence of surgery related to problems with peri-implantitis: a retrospective study on patients followed up between 2003 and 2010 at one specialist clinic. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015, 17: 209-220.
JIKAMO B, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Sidamic version of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-Bref Scale measuring the quality of life of women with severe preeclampsia in southern Ethiopia, 2020. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2021; 19: 239-245.
KIM HY, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module. Geriatric Nursing, 2021; 42: 548-554.
LOCKER D, et al. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2001; 29: 373-381.
MARTINS AMC, et al. The effect of complete dentures on edentulous patients' oral health-related quality of life in long-term: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Research Journal, 2021; 18: 65-71.
PASSIA N, et al. Influence of the number of implants in the edentulous mandible on chewing efficacy and oral health-related quality of life-A within-subject design study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2022; 33: 1030-1037.
RIVA F, et al. Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: A systematic review. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2022; 50: 333-338.
SANTUCCI D, et al. Development of a Maltese version of oral health-associated questionnaires: OHIP-14, GOHAI, and the Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2014; 27: 44-49.
SARTORETTO SC, et al. Effectiveness of Supportive Care in the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases in Brånemark Protocol Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2022; 42: 217-223.
SHARKA R, et al. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: An umbrella systematic review. Gerodontology, 2019; 36(3): 195-204.
SOUZA JÚNIOR EV, et al. Relationship between family functionality and the quality of life of the elderly. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021; 75: 20210106.
ZAHED M, et al. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Liver Failure Patients Measured by OHIP-14 and GOHAI. BioMed Research International, 2020; 26: 8835824.
