Keywords
Dental implants
Osseointegration
Biocompatible materials
Dental porcelain
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this literature review is to present the most recent studies on the mechanical and biological properties of TCP when added to zirconia, in order to evaluate its feasibility and potential for use in dental applications. Literature review: The addition of tricalcium phosphate to zirconia has been investigated as a way to improve the properties of this material. Some recent research has focused on modifying the surface of zirconia by depositing a layer of calcium phosphate, thereby allowing the formation of a direct bone-implant interface, improving the bone healing process around the implant. β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is a promising material for coating inert bone implants due to its favorable biological characteristics, such as osteoconductivity, bioresorbability, and bone-binding capacity, as well as increasing the density and grain size of zirconia, improving its fracture resistance. Conclusions: Studies suggest that the addition of tricalcium phosphate to zirconia can improve the mechanical and biological properties of the material, making it a promising option for medical and dental applications.
References
ALMEIDA RS, et al. Regeneração de defeito ósseo crítico após implantação de fosfato de cálcio bifásico (β-fosfato tricálcico/pirofosfato de cálcio) e vidro bioativo fosfatado. Cerâmica, 2020; 66: 119-25. Disponível em: https ://doi.org/10.1590/0366-69132020663782707.
ANDREIOTELLI M, et al. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009; 20: 32.
ARAÚJO SM, et al. Influência da incorporação da HAp e β-TCP no cimento ósseo wollastonita/brushita. Revista Matéria, 2019; 24(3).
AZEVEDO VVC, et al. Materiais cerâmicos utilizados para implantes. Rev Eletr Mater Proc. 2007; (23): 35-42.
BISPO LB. Cerâmicas odontológicas: vantagens e limitações da zircônia. Rev. bras. odontol, 2015; 72(1-2): 24-9.
DACULSI G, et al. Macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic for long bone surgery in humans and dogs. Clinical and histological study. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990; 24: 379–396.
DASGUPTA S, et al. Investigating the mechanical, physiochemical and osteogenic properties in gelatin-chitosan-bioactive nanoceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019.
FILHO LCC, et al. Implante unitário de corpo único em zircônia em área estética–relato de caso. Full Dent. Sci, 2022; 13(51): 28-34.
FILHO ROS e VASCONCELOS AA. Pilares cerâmicos utilizados na odontologia: revisão de literatura. Odontol. Clín.-Cient. (Online), 2016; 15(1).
FREITAS PH, et al. Implantes de zircônia na odontologia: Revisão de Literatura. Revista Odontológica do Brasil Central, 2017; 26(79): 1-8.
GAUTAM C, et al. Zirconia based dental ceramics: structure, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications. Dalton Trans. 2016.
GUASTALDI AC e APARECIDA AH. “Calcium phosphates of biological interest: Importance as biomaterials, properties and methods for coatings obtaining”, Quim. Nova, 2010; 33(6): 1352-1358.
HISBERGUES M, et al. Zirconia: established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental Implantology. J Biomedic Mat Res. 2008: 519-29.
HOCHSCHEIDT CJ, et al. Implantes cerâmicos-evidências científicas para o seu uso. Full Dent Sci, 2014; 5: 535-45.
JEONG J, et al. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration. Biomater Res, 2019; 23: 4.
KELCH M, et al. Impact of different pretreatments and aging procedures on the flexural strength and phase structure of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater, 2019; 35(10): 1439-49.
KIM YK, et al. Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a comparison with traditional grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 117-45.
KOUTAYAS SO, et al. Zirconia in Dentistry: Part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009; 4: 348.
LU J, et al. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 63: 408–412.
MARQUES H e NEVES J. Modelagem anatômica para abutment de implante personalizado de zircônia para melhorar a estética anterior: uma técnica clínica. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 2021; 3(1): 5-17.
MONTEIRO MLS, et al. Síntese de hidroxiapatita para aplicação em biocerâmicas: uma revisão da literatura. Dissertação (Graduação em Engenharia de Materiais) – Campus Universitário de Ananindeua. Universidade Federal do Pará, Ananindeua, 2021; 63.
MOTTA BBM, et al. Influência do percentual de ítrio nas propriedades da zircônia monolítica: Revisão de literatura. Rev Nav Odontol, 2022; 49(2): 33-38.
PIERALLI S, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. Journal of Dental Research, 2017; 96(1): 38-46.
PIRES AL, et al. Biomaterials: Types, applications, and market. Química Nova, 2015; 38: 957-971.
PRITHVIRAJ DR, et al. A systematic review of zirconia as an implant material. Indian J Dent Res. 2012; 23: 643-9.
RODRIGUEZ AE, et al. Implantes dentários de zircônia: uma avaliação clínica e radiográfica. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018; 1–7.
ROEHLING S, et al. Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019; 30(5): 365-375.
ROSA SFJ, et al. Cerâmicas de fosfatos de cálcio bifásicas: uma revisão: Uma Revisão. Revista Eletrônica de Materiais e Processos, 2020; 15.
RUPP F, et al. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. Dental Materials, 2017; 34(1): 40–57.
SIDDIQI A, et al. Titanium allergy: could it affect dental implant integration? Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011; 22: 673–80.
SONG YG e CHO IH. Characteristics and osteogenic effect of zirconia porous scaffold coated with β-TCP/HA. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 285-294.
STAWARCZYK B, et al. Three generations of zirconia: from veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int, 2017; 48(5): 369-80.
TOSTES BO, et al. Characterization of conventional and high-translucency Y-TZP dental ceramics submitted to air abrasion. Brazilian Dental Journal, 2017; 28(1): 97–104.
WANG Q, et al. Multi-scale surface treatments of titanium implants for rapid osseointegration: A review. Nanomaterials, 2020; 10(6): 1–27.
WEBBER, LP, et al. Will zirconia implants replace titanium implants. Applied Sciences, 2021; 11(15): 6776.
WENZ HJ, et al. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Prosthod. 2008; 21: 27-36.
ZADEH PN, et al. Flexural strength, fracture toughness and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials. J Prosthet Dent, 2018; 120(6): 948-54.
ZHANG W, et al. Fabrication of interconnected microporous biomaterials with high hydroxyapatite nanoparticle loading. Biofabrication, 2010; 2(3): 35006.
ZHANG W, et al. Improving the osseointegration and soft tissue sealing of zirconia ceramics by the incorporation of akermanite via sol infiltration for dental implants. J Mater Chem B. 2023; 11: 4237-4259.
ZHANG Y e LAWN BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res, 2018; 97(2): 140-7.