Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Microbiological and in silico evaluation of triazole and bi-triazole derivatives
PDF

Keywords

Bi-Triazoles
Triazoles
Antimicrobial
In silico

How to Cite

Microbiological and in silico evaluation of triazole and bi-triazole derivatives. (2025). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 25, e18263. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e18263.2025

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the antibacterial activity of triazole and bi-triazole compounds against the pathogens Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: This targeted research was combined with in silico predictions aimed at the rational and safe screening of these compounds. For this purpose, the virtual programs Osiris, Molinspiration, and ADMETlab were used. The inhibitory potential of the compounds was evaluated by the agar dilution method and by determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). Results: The results showed that none of the nine compounds exhibited promising levels of bacterial inhibition at the maximum concentration of 500 μg/mL in both tests. These results suggest the need to add other radicals to the pharmacophoric group of triazoles and bi-triazoles to achieve antibacterial action against these species. Although the triazoles and bi-triazoles tested were not effective in bacterial inhibition, the in silico predictions for physicochemical properties revealed that all compounds met Lipinski's and Veber's rules in the development of a potential oral drug. Conclusion: These in silico results indicate that both chemical classes have potential for developing a possible prototype, provided that their relevant bioactivity against other diseases can be confirmed.

PDF

References

AL-HEBSHI N, et al. In vitro antimicrobial and resistance-modifying activities of aqueous crude khat extracts against oral microorganisms. Archives of Oral Biology, 2006; 51(3): 183–188.

ANEJA B, et al. Natural Product-Based 1,2,3-Triazole/Sulfonate Analogues as Potential Chemotherapeutic Agents for Bacterial Infections. ACS Omega, 2018; 3(6): 6912–6930.

ARAFA WAA e MOHAMED AS. Convenient one pot synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of some new Mannich bases carrying 1,2,4-triazolyl moiety. Chinese Journal of Chemistry, 2011; 29(8): 1661–1668.

ASIF M et al. Insight into Acinetobacter baumannii: pathogenesis, global resistance, mechanisms of resistance, treatment options, and alternative modalities. Infection and Drug Resistance, 2018; 11: 1249–1260.

BASTOS IS. Avaliação da atividade antibacteriana, antifúngica e antimalárica de extratos, frações e composto obtidos de plantas da região Amazônica. 2016. 1–157 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em saúde sociedade e endemias na Amazônia) – Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, 2016.

BAZZINI P e WERMUTH CG. Substituent Groups. In: CAMILLE GEORGES WERMUTH, DAVID ALDOUS, PIERRE RABOISSON, Didier Rognan (Org.). The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry. San Diego, USA: Elsevier, 2008; 4: 319–357.

CLSI. CLINICAL AND LABORATORY STANDARDS INSTITUTE. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard — Ninth Edition. CLSI document M07-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne: [s.n.], [s.d.], 2012.

DAINA A, et al. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports, 2017; 7(1): 42717.

DEMIRCI S, et al. Preparation and antimicrobial activity evaluation of some new bi- and triheterocyclic azoles. Medicinal Chemistry Research, 2013; 22(10): 4930–4945.

EL MALAH T, et al. Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Activities of 1,2,3-Triazole Glycoside Clickamers. Molecules, 2020; 25(4): 790.

FERRIS RA, et al. Model of Chronic Equine Endometritis Involving a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm. Infection and Immunity, 2017; 85(12): 1–14.

GELATTI LC, et al. Sepse por Staphylococus aureus resistente à meticilina adquirida na comunidade no sul do Brasil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2009; 42(4): 458–460.

GROVE CD e RANDALL W. Assay methods of antibiotics - A Laboratory Manual. New York: Intercsience Publishers Inc, 1955; 8.

HOLETZ FB, et al. Screening of Some Plants Used in the Brazilian Folk Medicine for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2002; 97: 1027–1031.

KERNS EH e DI L. Lipophilicity. Drug-like Properties: Concepts, Structure Design and Methods. 1. ed. San Diego, USA: Elsevier, 2008; 43–47.

LIPINSKI CA. Lead- and drug-like compounds: The rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 2004; 1(4): 337–341.

LLOR C e BJERRUM L. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 2014; 5(6): 229–241.

LOMBARDO F, et al. In Silico Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Pharmacokinetics (ADME-PK): Utility and Best Practices. An Industry Perspective from the International Consortium for Innovation through Quality in Pharmaceutical Development. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2017; 60(22): 9097–9113.

LOPYREV VA e RAKHMATULINA TN. ChemInform Abstract: Synthesis of 3(5)-trifluoromethyl-5(3)-amino-1,2,4-triazole. Chemischer Informationsdienst, 1984; 15(4).

LOWY FD. Staphylococcus aureus Infections. New England Journal of Medicine, 1998; 339(8): 520–532.

MAGALHÃES, UIARAN DE OLIVEIRA. Modelagem molecular e avaliação da relação estruturaatividade acoplados a estudos físico-químicos, farmacocinéticos e toxicológicos In silico de derivados heterocíclicos com atividade leishmanicida. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Farmacêuticas) Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Farmácia, Rio de Janeiro, 2009.

MESAROS N, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance and therapeutic options at the turn of the new millennium. Antibiotiques, 2007; 9(3): 189–198.

NAVON-VENEZIA S, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2017; 41(3): 252–275.

NEGI B, et al. Anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity, synergism with oxacillin and molecular docking studies of metronidazole-triazole hybrids. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2016; 115: 426–437.

OSTROSKY EA, et al. Métodos para avaliação da atividade antimicrobiana e determinação da Concentração Mínima Inibitória (CMI) de plantas medicinais. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 2008; 18(2): 301–307.

SHAH P, et al. The role of fluorine in medicinal chemistry. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 2007; 22(5): 527–540.

SU Z, et al. Evaluation of 4,5-Disubstituted-2-Aminoimidazole-Triazole Conjugates for Antibiofilm/ Antibiotic Resensitization Activity Against MRSA and Acinetobacter baumannii. ChemMedChem, 2011; 6(12): 2243–2251.

VEBER DF, et al. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2002; 45(12): 2615–2623.

WANG X e QIN L. A review on Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of Acute Disease, 2019; 8(1): 16.

WHO, World Health Organization. GLASS | Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report Early implementation 2016-2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 24 jun. 2022.

WHO. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. GLASS Reporting, The detection and Resistance, of colistin, Global Antimicrobial Resistance and (GLASS), Use Surveillance System. Disponível em: Acesso em: 24 jun. 2022.