Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the benefits and benefits of the Scarpa fascia preservation technique in abdominoplasty surgeries. Methods: An integrative review was conducted on National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and Portal Regional da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (PR-BVS) databases. The descriptors index used were “Abdominoplasty” AND “Scarpa fascia”. The inclusion criteria consisted in observational studies and controlled clinical trials, available in English, Portuguese or Spanish. The exclusion criteria used were duplicate studies and articles that deviated from the main topic. The universe consisted of 11 scientific studies. Results: The reduction of the amount of drain output, time to drain removal, hospital stay, and incidence of seroma were considered relevant. However, the difficulty in accessing the operative plane and the lack of significant improvement in abdominal perfusion when using infrared fluorescence imaging are possible limitations of the technique. Conclusion: It was possible to verify that the superficial dissection plane is mostly advantageous through the correct alignment of expectations. Decision-making must consider both important aspects for the patient as well as surgical issues observed by the physician.
References
ABU-HIJEH MF, et al. The Membranous Layer of Superficial Fascia: Evidence for its Widespread Distribution in the Body. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2006; 28(6): 606-19.
AHERRERA AS, et al. Evaluation of Abdominal Cutaneous Sensibility Following Abdominoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015; 135(3): 526-32.
ANDRADES P e PRADO A. Composition of Postabdominoplasty Seroma. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2007; 31(5): 514-8.
BOSSERT RP e RUBIN JP. Evaluation of the Weight Loss Patient Presenting for Plastic Surgery Consultation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012; 130(6): 1361-9.
BRAGG TW, et al. Patient Satisfaction Following Abdominoplasty: an NHS Experience. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2007; 60(1): 75-8.
CORREIA-GONÇALVES I, et al. Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation - Comparative Study in a Bariatric Population. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2017; 13(3): 423-8.
COSTA-FERREIRA A, et al. Scarpa Fascia Preservation during Abdominoplasty: a Prospective Study. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 2010; 125(4): 1232-1239.
COSTA-FERREIRA A, et al. Scarpa Fascia Preservation during Abdominoplasty: Randomized Clinical Study of Efficacy and Safety. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 2013; 131(3): 644-51.
DI MARTINO M, et al. Seroma in Lipoabdominoplasty and Abdominoplasty: a Comparative Study using Ultrasound. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 2010; 126(5): 1742-51.
EDMONDSON SJ e ROSS DA. The Postpartum Abdomen: Psychology, Surgery and Quality of life. Hernia, 2021; 25(4): 939-50.
INFORZATO HCB, et al. Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020; 44(2): 445-52.
ISAPS. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY. 2023. Aesthetic Procedures Close to 35 Million in 2023. Disponível em: https ://www.isaps.org/. Acesso em: 16 de agosto de 2024.
KITZINGER HB, et al. After Massive Weight Loss: Patients' Expectations of Body Contouring Surgery. Obesity Surgery, 2012; 22(4): 544-8.
KOLLER M e HINTRINGER T. Scarpa fascia or rectus fascia in abdominoplasty flap elevation: a prospective clinical trial, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2012; 36(2): 241-3.
LE LOUARN C. Partial Subfascial Abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1996; 20(2): 123-7.
LOCKWOOD T. Fegli-lateral-tension Abdominoplasty with Superficial Fascial System Suspension. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995; 9: 603-8.
MATARASSO A e SMITH DM. Strategies for Aesthetic Reshaping of the Postpartum Patient. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 2015; 136(2): 245-57.
MONTEIRO IA, et al. Postbariatric Abdominoplasty: A Comparative Study on Scarpa Fascia Preservation Versus Classical Technique. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023; 47(6): 2511-24.
NAHAI FR. Anatomic Considerations in Abdominoplasty. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 2010; 37(3): 407-14.
NOVAIS CS, et al. Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation: Randomized Controlled Trial with Assessment of Scar Quality and Cutaneous Sensibility. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 2020; 146(2): 156-64.
PITANGUY I. Abdominal Lipectomy. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 1975; 2(3): 401-10.
PITANGUY I. Abdominal Lipectomy: An Approach to it Through an Analysis of 300 Consecutive cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1967; 40: 384-92.
SALDANHA FILHO OR, et. al. Avaliação quantitativa do débito do dreno na lipoabdominoplastia - estudo comparativo. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 2014; 29(2): 259-63.
SCHAVERIEN M, et al. Arterial and Venous Anatomies of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator and Superficial inferior Epigastric Artery Flaps. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 2008; 121(6): 1909-19.
SHEHAB ME, et al. Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Patients Who Underwent Post Massive Weight Loss Body Contouring Procedures: A Tertiary Center Experience in Bahrain. World Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2024; 13(1): 71-82.
SWANSON E. Comparison of Limited and Full Dissection Abdominoplasty Using Laser Fluorescence Imaging to Evaluate Perfusion of the Abdominal Skin. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015; 136(1): 31-43.
TAYLOR GI e DANIEL RK. The Anatomy of Several Free Flap Donor Sites. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1975; 56(3): 243-53.
TAYLOR J e SHERMAK M. Body Contouring Following Massive Weight Loss. Obesity Surgery, 2004; 14(8): 1080-5.
VALENÇA-FILIPE R, et al. Classic Versus Scarpa-sparing abdominoplasty: An infrared thermographic comparative analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2023; 82: 264-74.
WHO. World health organization. 2024. Obesity and overweight. 2024. Disponível em: https ://www.who.int/. Acesso em: 16 de agosto de 2024.
WORLD OBESITY FEDERATION. World Obesity Atlas 2024. London, 2024; 1.
WULKAN M e HURWITZ D. Preservação e suspensão da fáscia de Scarpa na abdominoplastia. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 2010; 25(3): 490-8.
