Keywords
3D manufacturing
Plastic surgery
Reconstructive surgery
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate recent progress and clinical applications of advanced biomaterials in plastic surgery, exploring the benefits, challenges, and implications for surgical practice. Methods: Integrative review conducted with a complete analysis of 16 articles in the English language, published between 2023 and 2024, which address the use of different advanced biomaterials used in surgical procedures, seeking to verify the improvement of clinical and aesthetic results. Results: Advances in tissue reconstruction and wound treatment have been highlighted, with emphasis on the effectiveness of 3D-printed implants, flap transplantation, and continuous infusion of vancomycin. Innovative materials, such as bioinks and bilayer membranes, showed good biocompatibility and potential for tissue regeneration. Smart dressings and 3D bioprinting also stand out, despite still facing challenges. Overall, these innovations point to significant improvements in reconstructive surgery and regenerative medicine. Final considerations: These innovations in biomaterials offer a relevant benefit in plastic surgery, reconstructive surgery and post-operative improvement, but more clinical trials of different biomaterials are needed before a comprehensive application.
References
BERGAMO ETP, et al. Osteogenic differentiation and reconstruction of mandible defects using a novel resorbable membrane: An in vitro and in vivo experimental study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2023; 111(11): 1966-1978.
BUSHONG EE, et al. To acellular dermal matrix or not to acellular dermal matrix? — outcomes of pre-pectoral prosthetic reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix. Gland Surg, 2024;13(6): 885-896.
CHENG L, et al. Fabrication of pH-stimuli hydrogel as bioactive materials for wound healing applications. Heliyon, 2024; 1: 1-13.
CIANCIOSI A, et al. Flexible Allyl-Modified Gelatin Photoclick Resin Tailored for Volumetric Bioprinting of
FARAHANI PK. Application of Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials in Nose Surgery. JPRAS Open. 2023; 40: 262-272.
FRANCESCO DF, et al. The evolution of current concept of the reconstructive ladder in plastic surgery: the emerging role of translational medicine. Cells MDPI, 2023; 12: 2567.
GRANDJEAN T, et al. Towards optimized tissue regeneration: a new 3D printable bioink of alginate/cellulose hydrogel loaded with thrombocyte concentrate. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2024; 12: 1363380.
JAMAL M, et al. Development of Biocompatible Electrospun PHBV-PLLA Polymeric Bilayer Composite Membranes for Skin Tissue Engineering Applications Molecules, 2024; 29: 2049.
JESSOP ZM, et al. The challenge for reconstructive surgeons in the twenty-first century: manufacturing tissue-engineered solutions. Frontiers in Surgery, 2015; 2(52).
KAUKE-NAVARRO M, et al. Balancing beauty and science: a review of facial implant materials in craniofacial surgery. Frontiers in Surgery, 2024; 11: 1348140.
LI H, et al. Recent progress and clinical applications of advenced biomaterials in cosmetic surgery. Regenerative biomaterials, 2023; 10: 5.
LI M, et al. Smart and versatile biomaterials for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials Research, 2023; 27: 87.
LIU Y, et al. Application and progress of new technologies and new materials in the treatment of pathological scar. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2024; 1(12): 1389399.
Matrices for Soft Tissue Engineering. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2023; 12: 2300977.
MIRSKY NA, et al. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review for Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Bioengineering, 2024; 1: 1-41.
SINGH TS, et al. The Utility of 3D Printing for Surgical Planning and Patient-Specific Implant Design in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Narrative Review. Cureus, 2023; 15(11): 48242.
SLAVIN BV, et al. 3D Printing Applications for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction: A Sweeping Review. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2023; 9(12): 6586-6609.
SONG L e LIU X. Evaluating the therapeutic and reconstructive efficacy of flap transplantation techniques in managing nasal tissue deficiency resulting from post-rhinoplasty surgical infections. Int Wound J. 2024; 21(2): 14566.
SONG Y, et al. Biomaterials combined with ADSCs for bone tissue engineering: current advances and applications. Regenerative Biomaterials, 2023; 10: 83.
SYSTERMANS S, et al. An innovative 3D hydroxyapatite patient-specific implant for maxillofacial bone reconstruction: A case series of 13 patients. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2024; 52: 420-431.
WANG L, et al. Outcomes following the excision of sarcoma and wall reconstruction using 3D printed implant. iScience, 2024; 27: 108757.
WANG P, et al. Emerging trends in the application of hydrogel-based biomaterials for enhanced wound healing: A literature review. International journal of biological macromolecules,2023; 261(1): 129300.
WANG Z, et al. Tropoelastin modulates systemic and local tissue responses to enhance wound healing. Elsevier, 2024; 184: 54-67.
WU SS, et al. Upper Extremity Wounds Treated with Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix versus Collagen-Chondroitin Silicone Bilayer. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery, 2022; 9743227.
WU Y, et al. Autophagy-modulating biomaterials: multifunctional weapons to promote tissue regeneration. Cell Commun Signal,2024; 22(124).