Keywords
Colorectal Neoplasms
Quality Indicators Health Care
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the adequacy of bowel preparation, the cecal intubation rate and the adenoma detection rate in outpatient colonoscopies performed at an endoscopic training center of a tertiary hospital in the city of São Paulo over a period of one year. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive and retrospective study, whose data source were the reports and anatomopathological analyzes of patients undergoing colonoscopy from June 2022 to May 2023 in a tertiary hospital. Results: The sample consisted of 630 colonoscopy exams. The average age of study participants was 58.6 years and the majority were female (65.7%). Colonic preparation was considered adequate in 88.8% of cases. A cecal intubation rate of 94.4% and an overall adenoma detection rate of 30.8% were achieved. Conclusion: The quality indicators analyzed show a strong interrelationship. The quality of bowel preparation and the adenoma detection rate reached the goals established by American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, while the cecal intubation rate approached the goal recommended by this entity.
References
ARRUDA ACS, et al. Perfil epidemiológico do câncer colorretal no estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2013-2022, Research, Society and Development, 2023; 12(10): e144121043615-e144121043615.
ARSLANCA G e AYGÜN M. Os efeitos da educação aprimorada, realizada por enfermeiros na qualidade do preparo intestinal para colonoscopia, Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem, 2022; 30: e3445.
BORGES J, et al. Avaliação da qualidade em colonoscopia e taxa de detecção de adenomas em Hospital Universitário, J Ciênc Saúde HU Univ Federal Piauí, 2023; 6(3): 18-27.
CARDOSO DMM, et al. Adenoma detection rate evaluation and quality of colonoscopy in the center-west region of Brazil, Arq Gastroenterol, 2017; 54(4): 315-320.
COELHO JCCGP, et al. A Qualidade da colonoscopia de um serviço Brasileiro de alto fluxo medida através da taxa de detecção de adenomas, Braz J Health Rev, 2021; 4(4): 15486-15496.
CORTES BGW, et al. Double blinded randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of several preparations for colonoscopy, J Coloproctol (Rio J), 2018; 38: 302-308.
CREMERS MI. Preparação intestinal para colonoscopia: como melhorar, Intestinal preparation for colonoscopy: how to improve, 2012; 19(4): 167-169.
FEITOZA JA, et al. Taxa de detecção de adenoma no serviço de endoscopia digestiva em um hospital de Curitiba, Rev Med Paraná, 2020; 78(2): 33-40.
FERLAY J, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Iarc Cancerbase. 2013; 11.
GEE T, et al. Efficacy of low residue enteral formula versus clear liquid diet during bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomised controlled pilot trial, J Coloproctol (Rio J), 2019; 39(1): 62-66.
GKOLFAKIS P, et al. Strategies to improve inpatients' quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2019; 2019: 1-11.
HASSAN C, et al. Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Gastrointest Endosc, 2023; 97(2): 212-225.
KAMINSKI MF, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative, United Eur Gastroenterol J., 2017; 5(3): 309-334.
KUGA R, et al. Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system, Acta Cirúrgica Bras, 2023; 37(11): e20232361.
MAGIER S, et al. Split-dose bowel preparation is superior to straight-dose in hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy, Arq Gastroenterol, 2023; 60(1): 39-47.
MARCELI S. Estimativa 2018: A incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2018; 64(1): 119-120.
MISERANI MTCLC, et al. Impacto de uma ligação telefônica na qualidade do preparo intestinal para colonoscopia: ensaio clínico randomizado, Rev Interdiscip Ciências Médicas, 2022; 6(1): 47-53.
MOREIRA LF, et al. Colonoscopic findings in patients younger than 40 years, J Coloproctol (Rio J), 2019; 39(2): 132-137.
PANTALEÓN SÁNCHEZ M, et al. Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy, Dig Endosc, 2022; 34(6): 1176-1184.
PARK SB e CHA JM. Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality, Clin Endosc, 2022; 55(3): 332-338.
PINTO RC, et al. Assessment of quality indexes in colonoscopy in the coloproctology service of a tertiary private hospital in Southern Brazil, J Coloproctol (Rio J), 2021; 41(1): 23-29.
PIRES MEP, et al. Rastreamento do câncer colorretal: revisão de literatura, Braz J Health Rev, 2021; 4(2): 6866-6881.
PUCCI MD, et al. Perfil clínico-epidemiológico do câncer colorretal na Região Oeste do Paraná, Brasil, 2016-2018, Rev Bras Cancerol, 2023; 69(1): 33-40.
REX D. Key quality indicators in colonoscopy, Gastroenterol Rep, 2023; 11: goad009.
REX DK, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy, Am J Gastroenterol, 2015; 110(1): 72-90.
SARTORI FSM, et al. Avaliação da taxa de detecção de adenoma e demais parâmetros de qualidade em colonoscopia, Braz J Dev, 2023; 9(3): 11271-11287.
SHARMA P, et al. The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention, Endosc Int Open, 2020; 8(5): E673-E683.
SILVA F, et al. Câncer colorretal em pacientes com idade inferior a 50 anos: experiência em cinco anos, Rev Col Bras Cir, 2020; 47: e20201234.
SPADA C, et al. Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European colonoscopy quality investigation (ECQI) group, Endosc Int Open, 2021; 9(10): E1456-E1462.
SPSS IBM. Statistics for Windows [computer program]. Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2016.
VISSOCI C, et al. Estudo comparativo entre as soluções de manitol e picossulfato de sódio com óxido de magnésio no preparo de cólon para colonoscopia, Rev Col Bras Cir, 2022; 49: e20222476.