Keywords
Total protein
Protease inhibitors
Salivary flow
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and compare the protein concentrations in whole saliva samples subjected to different pre-analytical processing protocols. Methods: Whole saliva was collected from 10 participants aged 23 to 65 years (mean age: 31.10 ± 4.059), and salivary flow rate was calculated (mL/min). Samples were aliquoted and assigned to six distinct groups (G1–G6), each reflecting a unique pre-analytical protocol combining the following combination of pre-analytical factors, including centrifugation, use of protease inhibitors, temperature, and storage duration. Total protein concentration was measured in duplicate using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A significant negative correlation was observed between salivary flow rate and total protein concentration in G1 (r = −0.794; p = 0.020), G4 (r = −0.690; p = 0.027), and G5 (r = −0.626; p = 0.05). In G3, total protein concentration was significantly positively correlated with age (rho = 0.762; p = 0.010). No statistically significant differences were found in mean total protein concentrations across groups (F(5,45) = 1.132; p = 0.358). Similarly, no differences were found in flow rate–normalized protein concentrations (F(5,45) = 2.068; p = 0.087). Conclusion: Methodological variations in saliva sample processing did not significantly affect total protein concentrations, suggesting robustness of this biomarker to pre-analytical conditions.
References
ABDUL NS, et al. A review on salivary constituents and their role in diagnostics. Bioinformation, 2022; 18(10):1021-1028.
BHAMIDIMARRI PM, et al. Assessing the impact of storage conditions on RNA from human saliva and its application to the identification of mRNA biomarkers for asthma. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 2024; 11:1363897.
BHUPTANI D, et al. Age and gender related changes of salivary total protein levels for forensic application. The Journal of Forensic Odontostomatology, 2018;36(1):26-33.
CHIAPPIN S,et al. Saliva specimen: A new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2007; 383:30-40.
CHEVALIER F, et al. Proteomic studies of saliva: A Proposal for Standardized Handling of Clinical Samples. 2007; Clinical Proteomics, 2007; 3:13-21.
CROUCH DJ. Oral fluid collection. The neglected variable in oral fluid testing. Forensic Science International 2005; 150: 165-173.
DHANARATHNA S,et al. Estimation and comparison of salivary flow rate and its composition in diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients: A pilot study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 2021; 25(2):232-238.
DURUK G e LALOGLU E. Relationship Between Dental Caries and YKL-40 Levels in Saliva. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2022; 46(2):137-142.
ESSER G, et al. Sample Stability and Protein Composition of Saliva. Biomarker Insights, 2008; 3: 25-37.
FONTELES CS, et al. Association of free amino acids with caries experience and mutans streptococci levels in whole saliva of children with early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Jan;54(1):80-5.
GONZÁLEZ-HERNÁNDEZ JM, et al. A. Influence of Sampling Conditions, Salivary Flow, and Total Protein Content in Uric Acid Measurements in Saliva. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2019; 8(9):389.
HELMERHORST EJ e OPPENHEIM FG. Saliva: a dynamic proteome. Journal of Dental Research, 2007; 86(8):680-93.
HOEK GH, et al. Toothbrushing affects the protein composition of whole saliva. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 2002;110(6):480-1.
JONG EP, et al. Sample collection and handling considerations for peptidomic studies in whole saliva; implications for biomarker discovery. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2011; 412: 2284-2288.
KHURSHID Z,, et al. Biochemical analysis of oral fluids for disease detection. Advances in Clinical Chemistry, 2021;100:205-253.
LIU G, et al. Effect of protese inhibitors on the quantitative and qualitative assessment of oral microbes. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2010; 312(1): 63-70.
MIZUHASHI F, et al. Protein Ingredient in Saliva on Oral Dryness Patients Caused by Calcium Blocker. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020;5(4):70.
MORTAZAVI H, et al. Extensive comparison of salivary collection, transportation, preparation, and storage methods: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health, 2024; 24(1):168.
PAPPA E, et al. Proteomic advances in salivary diagnostics. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Proteins and Proteomics, 2020; (11):140494.
THOMADAKI H, et al. Whole-saliva Proteolysis and Its Impact on Salivary Diagnostics. Journal of Dental Research, 2011; 90(11) 1325-1330
VELJOVIĆ T, et al. The influence of periodontal disease treatment on 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine concentrations in saliva and plasma of chronic periodontitis patients. Acta Clinica Croatica, 2020;59(4):615-622.