Keywords
Dental prosthesis
Polimerizacion
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze and compare CAD/CAM technology regarding its superiority over the conventional technique in the fabrication of mucosa-supported complete dentures. Methods: The research was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in two databases, Medline-PubMed and Scopus, including studies that compared both techniques and were published in the last 10 years. A total of 389 articles were found, and after analyzing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with the aid of the Endnote selection software, 5 articles remained. Results: Dentures fabricated through the digital workflow presented advantages such as faster fabrication, better adaptation, and reduced weight and volume, with no significant difference in monomer release. However, they have a high cost and require standardization of both clinical and laboratory techniques. Final considerations: CAD/CAM technology has shown promising results in optimizing the workflow compared to the conventional technique.
References
ALBERO A, et al. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network, J Clin Exp Dent, 2015; 7(4): e495-500.
ARUTYUNOV SD, et al. Modelagem matemática do comportamento biomecânico da base da prótese dentária removível sob cargas de mastigação características, 2020; 24: e420–431.
BABA NZ. Materials and Processes for CAD/CAM Complete Denture Fabrication. Rev. Curr Oral Health Article in Current Oral Health Reports, 2016.
BILGIN MS. A review of computer- aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. European Journal of Dentistry, 2016; 10(2): e286-91.
CHO SY, SONG YG. Um estudo comparativo sobre a resistência de ligação ao cisalhamento de resina impressa em 3D e resina convencional de base de dentadura curada a quente para materiais de revestimento de dentadura. J. Dent. Rehabil. Sci, 2021; 37: e232–243.
DAWID MT, et al. Complicações técnicas de próteses parciais removíveis na dentição moderadamente reduzida: uma revisão sistemática. Dent. J, 2023; 11(55).
DIMITROVA M, et al. Análise espectrofotométrica de resina de base de dentadura impressa em 3D e convencional após imersão em diferentes agentes de coloração — um estudo in vitro, Appl. Sci, 2022; 12: e12560.
DORWEILER BO. Controle de qualidade em impressão 3D: análise de precisão de materiais impressos em 3D Modelos de anatomia específica do paciente. Materiais 2021; 14. Seleção de materiais odontológicos para a fabricação aditiva de próteses totais removíveis (DCR).
GRACHEV DI, et al. Ranking Technologies of Additive Manufacturing of Removable Complete Dentures by the Results of Their Mechanical Testing, Dentistry Journal, 2023; 11(11): e265.
HOWICK J, et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence levels of evidence (introductory document). Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, 201: e1-3.
KALBERER N, et al. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness, J Prosthet Dent, 2019;121(4):637–643.
LI Y, et al. Design of complete dentures by adopting CAD developed for fixed prostheses. J Prosthodont, 2018;27(2):212–219.
KOULIVAND S, et al. A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time, J Esthet Restor Dent, 2020;32(2): e236-243.
MASRI G, et al. Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D PrintingTechniques: An In Vitro Study, J Contemp Dent Pract, 2020; 21(4): e367-371.
MCLAUGHLIN JB, et al. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology. J Prosthodont, 2019; 28(4): e428-435.
POKER BC. Evaluation of surface roughness, wettability and adhesion of multispecies biofilm on 3D-printed resins for the base and teeth of complete dentures. J Appl Oral Sci, 2024;19(3) :e20230326.
SMITH OB, et al. Impacto econômico e clínico de dentaduras produzidas digitalmente. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2021; 30 (S2): e108-112.
SCHWEIGER J, GÜTH JF. Sistemática e conceitos para a produção digital de próteses totais: riscos e oportunidades. Int. J. Comput. Dent, 2018; 21:41–56.
STEINMASSL PA. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? Clin Oral Investig, 2017; 21(5): e1697-705.
ROCHA MM, et al. Complete denture hygiene solutions: antibiofilm activity and effects on physical and mechanical properties of acrylic resin, J Appl Oral Sci, 2021; 3(29):e20200948.
TAVARES CC, et al. Aplicabilidade dos sistemas CAD/CAM em Prótese Total: revisão de literatura, Arch Health Invest, 2019: 7(11).
YILMAZ B. et al. Use of CAD -CAM technology for the fabrication of complete dentures: An alternative technique. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2017;118 (2): e140–143.
YOON H-I, et al. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing, J Prosthet Dent ,2018;120(6): e919–926.