Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Analysis of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
PDF

Keywords

Anatomia transversal
Endodontia
Incisivo
Tratamento do canal radicular
Tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico

How to Cite

Analysis of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. (2025). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 25(6), e20802. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e20802.2025

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: Understanding root canal anatomyis essential for successful endodontic treatment. This studyanalyzed them orphology of root canals in maxillaryand mandibular anterior teeth in a Brazilian subpopulation using cone-beamcomputed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,975 CBCT images of anterior teeth from 268 patients. Images were analyzed using Xoran Cat software to asses the number of roots and canal configurations, classified according to Vertucci’scriteria. The chi-square test was applied (p < 0.05). Results: Most teeth (99.9%) had a single root; only 0.1% hadtwo. The most prevalentc onfiguration was Vertucci’sType I (95.8%), followed by Type III (2.8%) and Type II (1%). Types VI and VII were rare (0.3% and 0.1%). No significant association with gender was found (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Anterior teeth showed predominantly simple morphology, with single canals and roots being most common. However, anatomical variations may occur, and clinicians should be aware of them to ensure proper canal location and avoid endodontic treatment failure.

PDF

References

ALTUNSOY M, et al. A cone-beamc omputed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population. European Journal of Dentistry, 2014; 8(3): 302-306.

AMINSOBHANI M, et al. Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an Iranian population by cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran), 2013; 10(4): 358-366.

ARSLAN H, et al. Evaluating root canal configuration of mandibular incisors with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish population. Journal of Dental Sciences, 2015; 10(4): 359-364.

BARATTO FILHO F, et al. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary firs tmolars by using diferente methods. Journal of Endodontics, 2009; 35(3): 337-342.

BUHRLEY LJ, et al. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. Journal of Endodontics, 2002; 28(4): 324-327.

BULUT DG, et al. Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography. European Journal of Dentistry, 2015; 9(4): 551-557.

CALISKAN MK, et al. Root canal morphology of human permanente teeth in a Turkish population. Journal of Endodontics, 1995; 21(4): 200-204.

ESTRELA C, et al. Studyof Root Canal Anatomy in Human Permanent Teeth in A Sub population of Brazil's Center Region Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - Part 1. Brazilian Dental Journal, 2015; 26(5): 530-536.

GULABIVALA K, et al. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal, 2002; 35(1): 56-62.

HAN T, et al. A study of the root canal morphology of mandibular anterior teet husing cone-beam computed tomography in a Chinese subpopulation. Journal of Endodontics, 2014; 40(9): 1309-1314.

KAMTANE S e GHODKE M. Morphology of mandibular incisors: a studyon CBCT. Polish Journal of Radiology, 2016; 81: 15-16.

KARTAL N e YANIKOGLU FC. Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Journal of Endodontics, 1992; 18(11): 562-564.

KAYAOGLU G, et al. Root and canal symmetry in the mandibular anterior teeth of patients attending a dental clinic: CBCT study. Brazilian Oral Research, 2015; 29.

KIM S. Endodontic application of cone-beam computed tomography in South Korea. Journal of Endodontics, 2012; 38(2): 153-157.

LEONI GB, et al. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Journal of Endodontics, 2014; 40(5): 710-716.

LIAO Q, et al. Analysis of canal morphology of mandibular first premolar. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue, 2011; 20(5): 517-521.

LIN Z, et al. Use of CBCT to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2014; 36(9): 877-882.

LIU J, et al. CBCT studyof root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular incisors in a Chinese population. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2014; 72(1): 26-30.

MAUGER MJ, et al. An evaluation of canal morphology at different level sof root resection in mandibular incisors. Journal of Endodontics, 1998; 24(9): 607-609.

NEELAKANTAN P, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. Journal of Endodontics, 2010; 36(10): 1622-1627.

PECORA JD, et al. Internal anatomy, direction and number of roots and size of human mandibular canines. Brazilian Dental Journal, 1993; 4(1): 53-57.

PECORA JD, et al. Root formand canal anatomy of maxillary first premolars. Brazilian Dental Journal, 1992; 2(2): 87-94.

RAHIMI S, et al. Prevalence of two root canals in human mandibular anterior teeth in na Iranian population. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 2013; 24(2): 234-236.

RAJAKEERTHI R e NIVEDHITHA MSB. Use of cone beam computed tomography to identify the morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in Chennai population. Brazilian Dental Science, 2019; 22(1): 55-62.

SERT S, et al. Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. International Endodontic Journal, 2004; 37(7): 494-499.

SIKRI VK e SIKRI P. Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Endodontology, 1994; 6(1): 9-13.

SILVA EJ, et al. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study. Journal of Endodontics, 2014; 40(2): 173-176.

SOMMER RF, et al. Clinical endodontics: a manual of scientific endodontics. Saunders, 1961.

VERSIANI MA, et al. Root and root canal morphology of four-rooted maxillary second molars: a micro-computed tomography study. Journal of Endodontics, 2012; 38(7): 977-982.

VERTUCCI FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1984; 58(5): 589-599.

VERTUCCI FJ. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular anterior teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1974; 89(2): 369-371.

VERTUCCI FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics, 2005; 10(1): 3-29.

YANG H, et al. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. Journal of Endodontics, 2013; 39(4): 435-438.

ZHANG, et al. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. International Endodontic Journal, 2011; 44(2): 162-169.

ZHAO, et al. Cone-beamcomputed tomography analysis of root canal configuration of 4 674 mandibular anterior teeth. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2014; 46(1): 95-99.

ZHENGYAN, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in a Chongqing population. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2016; 12: 19-25.