Keywords
Invasive procedures
Ultrasonography
Complications
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To review the current literature to understand the benefits of using ultrasound in central venous puncture and to evaluate its clinical and economic implications. Methods: This is a descriptive literature review study that aims to analyze the impact of ultrasound in performing stroke. It consisted of selecting articles published between 2016 and 2024, available in databases such as MEDLINE, SciELO and LILACS. Articles in Portuguese and English that addressed the efficacy and safety of the ultrasound technique in stroke were included, excluding letters, theses and conference abstracts. Statistical analysis is not applicable because this is a narrative review. Results: The results will be evaluated through qualitative analysis of the selected studies, considering the puncture success rate, procedure time and reduction of complications due to increased safety and efficacy of the US procedure, in addition to the reduction of hospital costs associated with preventable complications. Final considerations: The review will provide a comprehensive view of the effectiveness of ultrasound in central venous access and may support future clinical guidelines and training.
References
AMIR R, et al. “Ultrasound. as a Screening Tool for Central Venous Catheter Positioning and Exclusion of Pneumothorax.” Critical care medicine, 2017; 45(7): 1192-1198.
BERTOGLIO S, et al. “A multicenter retrospective study on 4480 implanted PICC-ports: A GAVeCeLT project.” The journal of vascular access, 2022.
BODENHAM CHAIR A, et al. Association. of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access. Anaesthesia, 2016; 71(5): 573–585.
BRULL SJ e PRIELIPP RC. Vascular air embolism: A silent hazard to patient safety. J Crit Care, 2017; 42: 255-263.
CESARO S, et al. Uma. abordagem abrangente para a prevenção de complicações centrais do cateter venoso: resultados de 10 anos de vigilância prospectiva em pacientes com hematologia pediátrica. Ann Hematol, 2016; 95(9): 817-825.
DIXON OGB, et al. “A systematic review of management of inadvertent arterial injury during central venous catheterisation.” The journal of vascular access, 2017; 18(2).
FERREIRA VP, et al. Cateterismo venoso central: revisão integrativa sobre técnicas e complicações no procedimento. Ulakes Journal Of Medicine, 2021; 1(1).
FRANCO-SADUD R, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Central and Peripheral Vascular Access in Adults: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2019; 14: 1-22.
GOZZANI JL, et al. Practical Guide to Fluid Therapy. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
KEHAGIAS E, et al. Central. venous catheters: Which, when and how. Br J Radiol, 2023; 96(9): 11-51.
KIM YI, et al. Usefulness. of ultrasonography for the evaluation of catheter misplacement and complications after central venous catheterization. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, 2018; 5(2): 71–75.
LEE YM, et al. “Clinical. impact of early reinsertion of a central venous catheter after catheter removal in patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections.” Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2021; 42(2): 162-168.
LEIBOWITZ A, et al. Ultrasound. Guidance for Central Venous Access: Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations. J Intensive Care Med, 2020; 35(9): 303-321.
MCMENAM R, et al. J Intensivo Soc, 2017; 18: 258-260.
MEDLEJ K, et al. Complications. from Administration of vasopressors through peripheral venous catheters: an observational study. J Emerg Med, 2018; 54(9): 47–53.
NORITOMI DT, et al. Avaliação. de custo-efetividade da passagem de cateter venoso central guiada por ultrassonografia comparada com a técnica convencional sob perspectiva da fonte pagadora. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 2016; 28(1): 62–69.
OCIDENTAL JB. O início do cateterismo cardíaco e o impacto resultante na medicina pulmonar. Am J Physiol Célula pulmonar Mol Physiol, 2017; 313: 651-658.
OOM R, et al. Transitioning from anatomic landmarks to ultrasound guided central venous catheterizations: guidelines applied to clinical practice. J Vasc Access, 2017; 18: 328-333.
OSTROFF MD, et al. Rapid. Assessment of Vascular Exit Site and Tunneling Options (RAVESTO): A new decision tool in the management of the complex vascular access patients. J VASC ACCESS, 2023; 24(9): 311-317.
SAZDOV D, et al. Comparative. Analysis of Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Catheterization Compared to Blind Catheterization. PRILOZI, 2017; 38(2): 107–114.
SOTILLO CC, et al. Impacts. of ultrasonography on the immediate complications of central venous catheterization in the medical residency setting. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, 2024; 7(2): 1-18.
SPENCER TR e PITTIRUTI M. “Rapid Central Vein Assessment (RaCeVA): A systematic, 20 standardized approach for ultrasound assessment before central venous catheterization.” The Journal of Vascular Access, 2018; 20: 239–249.
YU LV, et al. “Peripherally inserted central catheters have a protective role and the effect of fluctuation curve feature in the risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters: a propensity-adjusted analysis.” BMC infectious diseases, 2022; 22: 1.