Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Larval therapy: immunological implications in host-parasite interaction
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Larval debridement therapy
Immunity
Wounds and injuries

How to Cite

Larval therapy: immunological implications in host-parasite interaction. (2025). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 25(9), e21297. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e21297.2025

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the host immunological implications caused by the use of larval therapy (LT) in the treatment of chronic wounds, in addition to unraveling its antimicrobial potential. Methods: The research is an Integrative Review, with search in the LILACS, BDENF and MEDLINE databases, using the following descriptors: Larval Debridement Therapy; Immunity; Wounds and Injuries, in English and Portuguese, whether reviews or in vitro or in vivo experiments. Results: 16 articles were included. The articles demonstrate a broad immunomodulatory action of LT in favor of angiogenesis, tissue repair and inflammatory resolution, highlighting actions of reduction of neutrophil activity; increase in differentiation of M2 macrophages and Treg lymphocytes; deactivation of the complement system, among others. Regarding the antimicrobial potential, the larvae secrete substances (chymotrypicins, lusifensins, glycosylates) capable of combating biofilms and bacteria, especially Gram-positive bacteria. Conclusion: The studies analyzed demonstrate that LT is a complex process, and there is a need to elucidate more precisely the bioactive molecules and their mechanisms of action, in order to understand and expand the therapeutic use.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ANDERSEN AS, et al. A novel approach to the antimicrobial activity of maggot debridement therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2010; 65(8):1646-1654.

AROMATARIS E, MUNN Z (Orgs.). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. [S.l.]: JBI, 2020.

CAZANDER G, et al. Do maggots have an influence on bacterial growth? A study on the susceptibility of strains of six different bacterial species to maggots of Lucilia sericata and their excretions/secretions. J Tissue Viability, 2009; 18(3):80-87.

CAZANDER G, et al. Maggot excretions affect the human complement system. Wound Repair Regen, 2012; 20(6):879-886.

ČEŘOVSKÝ V, BÉM R. Lucifensins, the insect defensins of biomedical importance: the story behind maggot therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2014; 7(3):251-264.

DAUROS SP, et al. The transcriptional responses of cultured wound cells to the excretions and secretions of medicinal Lucilia sericata larvae. Wound Repair Regen, 2017; 25(1):51-61.

GAO B, ZHU S. An insect defensin-derived β-hairpin peptide with enhanced antibacterial activity. ACS Chem Biol, 2014; 9(2):405-413.

GÜREL T, UMUR Ş. Can parasites be useful? Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 2024; 48(2):120-127.

HARRIS LG, et al. Disruption of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms by medicinal maggot Lucilia sericata excretions/secretions. Int J Artif Organs, 2009; 32(9):555-564.

JIANG KC, et al. Excretions/secretions from bacteria-pretreated maggot are more effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLOS ONE, 2012; 7(11):e49815.

MARCONDES C. Terapia larval de lesões de pele causadas por diabetes e outras doenças. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC, 2006; 88p.

MASIERO FS. O uso de larvas de dípteros (Arthropoda: Insecta) para o tratamento de lesões tegumentares: uma abordagem multissistêmica. Tese (Doutorado em Microbiologia e Parasitologia) – Instituto de Biologia. Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2019; 207p.

MASIERO FS, NASSU MP, SOARES MP, THYSSEN PJ. Histological patterns in healing chronic wounds using Cochliomyia macellaria (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae and other therapeutic measures. Parasitol Res, 2015; 114(8):2865-2872.

MCKENNA CH, et al. Gene expression in Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae exposed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii identifies shared and microbe-specific induction of immune genes. Insect Mol Biol, 2022; 31(1):85-100.

MUMCUOGLU KY, et al. Destruction of bacteria in the digestive tract of the maggot of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J Med Entomol, 2001; 38(2):161-166.

NASSU MP, THYSSEN PJ. Evaluation of larval density Cochliomyia macellaria F. (Diptera: Calliphoridae) for therapeutic use in the recovery of tegumentar injuries. Parasitol Res, 2015; 114(9):3255-3260.

NITSCHE MJT. Avaliação da recuperação das lesões cutâneas por meio da terapia larval utilizando como modelos ratos Wistar. Tese (Doutorado em Terapia Larval) – Universidade Estadual Paulista. Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, 2010; 51p.

PAGE MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71.

PECIVOVÁ J, et al. Effect of the extract from salivary glands of Lucilia sericata on human neutrophils. Neuro Endocrinol Lett, 2008; 29(5):794-797.

PRITCHARD DI, BROWN AP. Degradation of MSCRAMM target macromolecules in VLU slough by Lucilia sericata chymotrypsin 1 (ISP) persists in the presence of tissue gelatinase activity. Int Wound J, 2015; 12(4):414-421.

SIMMONS, SW. A bactericidal principle in excretions of surgical maggots which destroys important etiological agents of pyogenic infections. J Bacteriol, 1935; 30(3):253-67.

TAMURA T, CAZANDER G, ROOIJAKKERS SH, TROUW LA, NIBBERING PH. Excretions/secretions from medicinal larvae (Lucilia sericata) inhibit complement activation by two mechanisms. Wound Repair Regen, 2017; 25(1):41-50.

TELLEZ G, PIXLEY C, WOLFENDEN RE, et al. Probiotics/direct fed microbials for Salmonella control in poultry. Food Res Int, 2012; 45:628–633.

TELFORD G, BROWN AP, KIND A, ENGLISH JS, PRITCHARD DI. Maggot chymotrypsin I from Lucilia sericata is resistant to endogenous wound protease inhibitors. Br J Dermatol, 2011; 164(1):192-196.

TELFORD G, BROWN AP, RICH A, ENGLISH JS, PRITCHARD DI. Wound debridement potential of glycosidases of the wound-healing maggot, Lucilia sericata. Med Vet Entomol, 2012; 26(3):291-299.

THYSSEN PJ, FERRAZ JB, MASIERO FS, SUGUIMOTO PU, SILVA SM. Terapia do desbridamento larval: como a biologia atua em favor da reparação e cicatrização tecidual. In: LEITE CRM, PARISI MC, ROSA MFF (Orgs.). Interdisciplinaridade no contexto das doenças dos pés no diabetes. Mossoró: EDUERN, 2021; p. 225-250.

VAN DER PLAS MJ, BALDRY M, VAN DISSEL J, JUKEMA G, NIBBERING PH. Maggot secretions suppress pro-inflammatory responses of human monocytes through elevation of cyclic AMP. Diabetologia, 2009; 52(9):1962-1970.

VAN DER PLAS MJ, JUKEMA GN, WAI SW, DOGTEROM-BALLERING HCM, LAGENDIJK EL, VAN GULPEN C, NIBBERING PH. Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2007; 61(1):117–122.

ZHANG J, et al. Maggot treatment promotes healing of diabetic foot ulcer wounds possibly by upregulating Treg levels. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2022; 184:109187.