Keywords
Robotic surgery
Medicine
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To discuss, based on the literature, the efficacy and safety of robotic surgery in general surgery cases. Methods: This is an integrative literature review, conducted in the SciELO, PubMed® and CAPES Journal Portal databases, using the following descriptors: “Robotic Surgery”, “Robotic Surgical Procedures”, “Robotic Surgical Procedures”, “General Surgery”, “Efficacy” and “Efficacy”, associated with the Boolean operators AND and OR. The results selection process was described according to the PRISMA protocol. Results: Ten findings were selected for this review. These were categorized and organized, highlighting the information on: article title, author(s), year of publication, level of scientific evidence, type of study and main results. Comparing robotic surgery with conventional general surgery, the results suggested that this type of technological innovation provides several benefits, such as: greater precision, absence of recurrence, improved visualization, reduced number of complications, increased surgical precision, precise control of the instrument, reduced hospital stay, less blood loss, reduced pain, and better aesthetic results. Final considerations: Robotics is effective and safe, but requires training of professionals.
References
ABREU RF, et al. Análise da eficácia da cirurgia robótica com as técnicas cirúrgicas tradicionais, 2016 a 2021. Revista Contemporânea, 2023; 3(12): 31811-31814.
ARAUJO RL, et al. Overview and perspectives about the robotic surgical certification process in Brazil: the new statement and a national web-survey. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2020; 47: 1-8.
BARDIN L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011, 229 p.
BRIONES-MERA AR. Percepción del paciente sobre la aplicación de princípios bioéticos em los cuidados de los estudiantes de enfermería. Revista Colombiana de Enfermería, 2020; 19(3): 1-10.
CAVALCANTE LTC, OLIVEIRA AAS. Métodos de revisão bibliográfica nos estudos científicos. Psicologia em Revista, 2020; 26(1): 83-102.
CHANG W, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic rectal surgery—from the real word data of 1145 consecutive cases in China. Surgical Endoscopy, 2019; 34(9): 4079-4088.
CHIAVONE FBT, et al. Tecnologias utilizadas para apoio ao processo de enfermagem: revisão de escopo. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 2021; 34:1-7.
DONG J, et al. Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial adrenalectomy with a new robotic surgical system: A prospective clinical study. Frontiers in Surgery, 2023; 10: 1-9.
FRANCIS A, et al. Robotic Adrenalectomy: A 10-Year Clinical Experience at a Tertiary Medical Center. Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2022; 26(1): 1-7.
JARA RD, et al. Complications of Robotic Surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America, 2020; 100(2): 461-468.
JORGE GK, et al. O uso da tecnologia na prática assistencial do enfermeiro. Revista Gestão & Saúde, 2021; 23(1):10-24.
KEZAN RD, et al. Desafios e benefícios da cirurgia robótica no mundo moderno. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2023; 23(11): e14031.
MARQUES CCDG, SILVA SDB. O perfil humanista do enfermeiro que atua na unidade de terapia intensiva. Revista da JOPIC, 2020; 5(9): 15-30.
MATERAZZI G, ROSSI L. Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art. Updates Surg, 2020; 73: 1131-1146.
MENESES RD, et al. Hospital health profile of patients undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective observational study. Research, Society and Development, 2021; 10(3): 1-14.
MORRELL AL, et al. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2021; 48: 1-9.
MORRELL AL, et al. Robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 97 cases. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2021; 48: 1-10.
MUSTAFA S, et al. Robotic Curriculum Enhances Minimally Invasive General Surgery Residents’ Education. Journal of Surgical Education, 2019; 76(2): 548-553.
NACUL MP, et al. Educational note: teaching and training in robotic surgery. An opinion of the Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery Committee of the Brazilian College of Surgeons. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2020; 47: 1-12.
OLIVEIRA LR, et al. Prácticas asistenciales en salud y enfermería, ética, humanización y comunicación. Cultura de los Cuidados, 2021; 25(60): 1-5.
SAMUELSSON F, et al. Robotic surgery: technological advances and clinical applications in general surgery. Revista Ibero Americana Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, 2024; 10(3):680-687.
SOARES RA, et al. Cirurgia robótica: manejo e perspectivas nos dias atuais. Research, Society and Development, 2023; 12(2):1-8.
SODRÉ F, ROCON PC. O trabalho em saúde pode ser considerado “tecnologia leve”? Saúde e Sociedade, 2023; 32(1): 1-11.
SOUZA JWR, et al. Percepção dos Enfermeiros da Atenção Básica sobre tecnologias do cuidado. Revista Recien, 2021; 11(33): 204-211.
SOUZA MT, et al. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein, 2010; 8(1): 102-106.