Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the agreement between preoperative diagnoses and histopathological findings in women undergoing hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Teresina-PI, from 2022 to 2023. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 376 medical records of patients who underwent hysterectomy, analyzing sociodemographic variables, surgical indications, histopathological findings, and type of surgical approach. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, overall accuracy, Kappa coefficient, and Chi-square test, considering histopathology as the gold standard. Results: Fibroids were the main surgical indication (47.3%), followed by genital prolapse (21.1%), endometriosis (8.8%), and malignant neoplasms (5.9%). Preoperative diagnosis showed moderate performance for fibroids (sensitivity 67.2%; specificity 90.7%; accuracy 75.3%; κ=0.514; p<0.001), limited performance for endometriosis (sensitivity 60%; specificity 91.9%; accuracy 91.5%; κ=0.14; p<0.001), and low sensitivity for malignant neoplasms (5.6%), despite high specificity (99.2%) and accuracy (94.7%) (κ=0.07; p=0.054). Conclusion: Preoperative diagnosis showed good agreement for fibroids but important limitations for endometriosis and malignant neoplasms. These findings highlight the need for more accurate diagnostic protocols and the adoption of minimally invasive technologies, enabling a more personalized approach, aligned with technological advances, and capable of promoting better clinical outcomes and improved quality of life for patients.
References
AFONSO LO, et al. Prevalência de histerectomia e fatores associados em mulheres brasileiras com 50 anos ou mais: achados do Estudo Longitudinal da Saúde dos Idosos Brasileiros (ELSI-Brasil). BMC Public Health, 2024; 24: 1747.
AWUAH BG, et al. An age-period-cohort analysis of hysterectomy incidence trends in Germany from 2005 to 2019. Scientific Reports, 2024; 14: 15110.
AZADI A, et al. Histerectomia vaginal comparada à histerectomia laparoscópica em condições ginecológicas benignas: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2023; 142(6): 1373-1394.
BEYAN E, et al. Comparison of the effects of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy on sexual function and quality of life. BioMed Research International, 2020; 2020: 1-6.
BULHÃO MP, et al. Análise do perfil epidemiológico de mulheres submetidas a histerectomia para tratamento de lesões do colo uterino no Estado do Maranhão entre 2018 e 2023. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2025; 25: e16946.
CALDAS BS, ASCENÇÃO AMS. Protocolos para diagnóstico e manejo da hipertensão intra-abdominal em centros de tratamento intensivo. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2020; 47: e20202415.
CHEN YC, et al. Risk assessment of dementia after hysterectomy: analysis of 14-year data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 2020; 83: 394-399.
CHOI HG, et al. Association between hysterectomy and depression: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort. Menopause, 2020; 27: 543-549.
DATASUS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2021.
DOGAN H, et al. Short-term effects of connective tissue massage after hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2022; 45(1): 9-19.
EVERLING EM, et al. Open vs laparoscopic hernia repair in the Brazilian public health system. An 11-year nationwide population-based study. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 2020; 57(4): 484-490.
FARIA PM, et al. Comparação epidemiológica da histerectomia vaginal e videolaparoscópica no Brasil de 2016 a 2021. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2023; 9(5): 3080-3089.
FATHI A, et al. Operative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy vs conventional laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surgical Innovation, 2022; 29(5): 590-599.
FERHI M, et al. Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life After Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases: A Prospective Cohort Study. Cureus, 2024; 16(5): e60871.
KEZAN RD, et al. Desafios e benefícios da cirurgia robótica no mundo moderno. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde, 2023; 23(11)
LEE SH, et al. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Women’s Health, 2019; 19(1).
MADUEKE-LAVEAUX OS, et al. What we know about the long-term risks of hysterectomy for benign indication: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021; 10(22): 5335.
MAFRA JLY, et al. Panorama das histerectomias realizadas através do sistema único de saúde do Maranhão entre 2011 e 2020. Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos, 2024; 7(15): 1-16.
MEULEN JV. Increasing use of laparoscopic hysterectomy: we need to talk about outcomes. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2019; 126(6): 803.
MORETTO EE, et al. Endometriose. In: Promoção e Proteção da Saúde da Mulher - ATM. 2021; p. 53-64.
MORRELL ALG, et al. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2021; 48: e20202798.
NASCIMENTO SMB, et al. Comparação entre os principais métodos cirúrgicos utilizados na histerectomia. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 2024; 16(11): 1-9.
PARKER WH, et al. Conservação ovariana no momento da histerectomia por doença benigna. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007; 50(2): 354-361.
PICKETT CM, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023; 8(8): CD003677.
PILLARISETTY LS, MAHDY H. Vaginal hysterectomy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024.
PINTOS FERNÁNDEZ PM, et al. Complicaciones de la histerectomía total por patologías benignas en el servicio de cirugía general y ginecología del hospital regional de Pilar periodo 2017-2020. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 2022; 6(1): 4577-4585.
PIOTTO KL, et al. Epidemiology and factors associated with hysterectomy in a group of women. Research, Society and Development, 2022; 11(7): 1-10.
ROCCO M, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective and emergency surgical procedures in a university hospital. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 2022; 49: 1-7.
TRIGO ÁA, et al. Histerectomia: análise de dados comparativos entre técnicas videolaparoscópica e vaginal. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Médico, 2022; 8.
VERMEULEN CKM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: The POP-UP study. International Urogynecology Journal, 2021; 32: 841-850.
WANDERLEY GS, et al. Perfil epidemiológico dos casos de histerectomia em um hospital universitário terciário. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto), 2021; 54(1): 1-10.
ZHANG J, et al. Hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: the role of multichannel abdominal port and vaginal support ring. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2021; 47(7): 2521-2528.
