Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Comparison of methods: serology (IgM/IgG) and the rapid urease test (RUT) for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori in adults from Xingu–Pará, brazilian Amazon
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori
Rapid urease test
Serology
Endoscopy
Brazilian Amazon
Xingu–Pará

How to Cite

Comparison of methods: serology (IgM/IgG) and the rapid urease test (RUT) for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori in adults from Xingu–Pará, brazilian Amazon. (2026). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 26(1), e22551. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e22551.2026

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection using serological methods and the Rapid Urease Test (RUT) in adults attending a cardiovascular outpatient clinic with dyspeptic symptoms in the Xingu region. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted between June and October 2025 involving 40 adults (27 men and 13 women) residing in the Xingu region and treated at the cardiology outpatient clinic of a public hospital in Altamira. Infection was diagnosed using serological tests (ELISA for IgM and IgG) and the RUT applied to gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Variables analyzed included sex, age group, place of residence, and basic sanitation conditions, presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Results: The prevalence of H. pylori was higher by IgG serology (65%) compared with RUT (40%). IgM was positive in only 10% of participants. Infection was more frequent among men, particularly those aged 40–49 years, and among urban residents lacking access to treated water and sewage systems, indicating an association with environmental vulnerabilities. Conclusion: IgG serology proved useful as a non-invasive screening method for H. pylori in regions with limited access to invasive diagnostic procedures, such as the Xingu. The findings highlight the need for diagnostic strategies adapted to the local epidemiological context, characterized by poor sanitation and increased risk of exposure to the pathogen.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ALVARADO-ÁLVARE A, et al. Reduction of Helicobacter pylori cells in rural water supply using slow sand filtration. Environmental Monitoringand Assessment, 2024; 196: 619.

ALVAREZ-ARANDA J, et al. Environmental risk factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in rural Andean communities: a cross-sectional study. JournalofWaterand Health, 2024; 22(1): 45–58.

ARUP CONSULT. Helicobacter pylori Testing. ARUP Laboratories, 2024.

BHATTACHARYA D, et al. Determination of H. pylori prevalence by RUT in gastroenteritis patients of Raipur City of Chhattisgarh. InternationalJournalof Life Science, Biotechnologyand Pharma Research, 2025; 14(9): 1231-1234.

BOSSUYT PM, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 2015; 351: h5527.

BUTT J, et al. Antibody responses to Helicobacter pylori proteins predict risk of developing gastric cancer and identify individuals at high risk. Journalofthe American Heart Association, 2020; 9(18): e016000.

CASTRO-HERNANDEZ D, et al. Seroprevalence and diagnostic agreement of tests for Helicobacter pylori infection in Colombian adults from high-risk regions. Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología, 2024; 39(2): 123–134.

CHEY WD, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection. American JournalofGastroenterology, 2017; 112(2): 212–239.

CROWE SE. Indications and diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection. UpToDate, 2019.

CUNHA RPA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Helicobacter pylori in native populations from Brazilian Western Amazon. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2003; 97(4): 382–388.

ESCOBAR PARDM L, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in native Brazilian children from the Xingu River region. Jornal de Pediatria, 2011; 87(5): 498–505.

FREITAS MA, et al. Socioenvironmental determinants of Helicobacter pylori infection in Amazonian urban populations: a multilevel approach. BrazilianJournalofInfectiousDiseases, 2023; 27: 102812.

GHAZANFAR H, et al. Advances in diagnostic modalities for Helicobacter pylori infection. Life, 2024; 14(9): 1170.

HOOI JKY, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology, 2017; 153(2): 420–429.

KHEDMAT H, et al. Comparison of serology and rapid urease test in detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter, 2013; 18(2): 136–140.

LINS AK, et al. Infecção por Helicobacterpylori em comunidades ribeirinhas da Amazônia. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 2010; 47(1): 46–52.

MALFERTHEINER P, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection — the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut, 2017; 66(1): 6–30.

MÉGRAUD F, LEHOURS P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2007; 20(2): 280–322.

NOH CK, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of rapid urease test with the sweeping method versus tissue sampling method after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2024; 100(4): 660–669.e3.

POLK DB, PEEK RM. Helicobacter pylori: gastric cancer and beyond. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2010; 10(6): 403–414.

RAGHUNATH P, et al. Evaluation of RUT and ELISA tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients visiting a tertiary care hospital, South India. J Pure ApplMicrobiol, 2023; 17(1): 543–548.

RIAD MOHAMED. Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with coronary artery disease: is it an independent risk factor? Review. The Egyptian Heart Journal, 2021; 73(61): 2–6.

SANTOS JC, et al. Sex-based differences in immune response to chronic Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review. ImmunologyAdvances, 2023; 14(2): 199–212.

SILVA RM, et al. Serological performance of IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies for Helicobacter pylori in high-endemicity regions: a diagnostic reappraisal. Tropical GastroenterologyandHepatology, 2024; 52(1): 29–40

SHIMOYAMA T. Serological tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013; 6(4): 215–223.

SHUKLA P, et al. Is rapid urease test reliable as histopathological evaluation for Helicobacter pylori infection – a prospective study? Indian JournalofPathologyandOncology, 2024; 11(3): 224–228.

YU JH, et al. Evaluation of anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies for the detection of H. pylori infection in different populations. Diagnostics, 2022; 12(5): 1214.

ZAMAN A, et al. Observation of changes in Helicobacter pylori antigen and antibodies before and after therapy. InfectionandDrugResistance, 2020; 13: 2485–2492.

ZAMANI M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. AlimentaryPharmacology&Therapeutics, 2018; 47(7): 868–876.

ZHOU L, et al. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Children, 2022; 9(9): 1359.