Keywords
Laryngeal mask
Airway management
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To identify what current literature reports on the use of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) situations. Methods: This integrative review conducted searches in the PubMed and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases, using specific descriptors and limiting results from 2014 to 2024. A total of 128 articles were found in the VHL and 118 in PubMed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies made up the final sample. Results: The selected studies indicate that the LMA demonstrates high insertion success rates, rapid ventilation establishment and ease of use, making it an effective alternative to endotracheal intubation (ETI) in emergency settings. Clinical trials and observational studies show that LMA use reduces interruptions in chest compressions, promotes efficient ventilation and requires less technical expertise. In prehospital contexts, LMA use contributes to faster airway management and improved operational efficiency. Final considerations: The LMA has shown promising outcomes in CPA and may outperform ETI in specific scenarios. However, the limited number of Brazilian studies highlights the need for national research to assess its applicability and clinical impact within the local healthcare system.
References
BENGER JR, et al. Randomized comparison of supraglottic airway device vs tracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (AIRWAYS-2). JAMA, 2018; 320(8): 779–791.
BOSCH JA, et al. Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation, 2020; 156: 15–22.
CERECEDA-SÁNCHEZ FJ, et al. Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos. Revista Electrónica Atención Primaria, 2021; 53(9): 102062.
CHAN JJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the use of laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask airway for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by paramedics in Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal, 2022; 63(3): 157-161.
CHLOROS T, et al. Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway achieves faster insertion times than Classic LMA during chest compressions in manikins. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2014; 32(2): 156-159.
COOPER RM, et al. Second-generation supraglottic airway devices: design features, comparative performance and clinical implications. Anesthesia, 2018; 73(9): 1047–1056.
DAVIS D, et al. Supraglottic airway devices in pediatric resuscitation: performance, safety and clinical outcomes. Pediatric Emergency Care, 2020; 36(5): 243–249.
DUNDAR ZD, et al. Bag-Valve-Mask versus Laryngeal Mask Airway Ventilation in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Compressions: a simulation study. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2021; 36(2): 189-194.
DYSON JA, et al. The effect of provider training on success rates of supraglottic airway device placement in prehospital care: A prospective observational study. Prehospital Emergency Care, 2021; 25(4): 567–575.
GRAHAM CA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supraglottic airway devices versus endotracheal intubation in emergency airway management: a systematic review. Emergency Medicine Journal, 2019; 36(8): 453–459.
GRUBER C, et al. Airway management in cardiac arrest: Supraglottic devices yield more consistent outcomes than endotracheal intubation. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020; 27(6): 458–465.
HASEGAWA K, et al. Association of prehospital advanced airway management with neurological outcome and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA, v. 313, n. 1, p. 75-84, 2015.
HWANG SY, et al. Comparison of airway management strategies during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation study. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, 2018; 5(4): 253–261.
IZAWA J, et al. Association between airway management and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide, population-based observational study. Resuscitation, 2019; 144: 114–122.
KATOH A, et al. Outcomes of prehospital laryngeal mask airway implementation in rapid response systems: A nationwide observational cohort. Prehospital Emergency Care, 2023; 27(2): 220–229.
LAVERY GG, et al. Capnography as a predictor of return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review. Resuscitation, 2021; 167: 132–140.
LEE AF, et al. Effect of Placement of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal Intubation on Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA Network Open, 2022;
LEMAITRE EL, et al. Effectiveness of Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in managing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by non-physicians. Resuscitation, 2019; 136: 61-69.
MANI S, et al. Laryngeal mask ventilation with chest compression during neonatal resuscitation: randomized, non-inferiority trial in lambs. Pediatric Research, 2022; 92(3): 671-677.
MARTIN M, et al. Learning curves and skill retention in supraglottic airway placement: a multicenter observational study. Resuscitation, 2021; 167: 201–208.
MENDES KDS, SILVEIRA RCCP, GALVÃO CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem, 2008; 17(4): 758-764.
MIDDLETON PM, et al. Higher insertion success with the i-gel® supraglottic airway in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation, 2014; 85(7): 893-897.
MILLER VJ, FLAHERTY EE. Comparing No-Flow Time During Endotracheal Intubation Versus Placement of a Laryngeal Mask Airway During a Simulated Cardiac Arrest Scenario. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2014; 9(3): 156-160.
MAHONEY BD, et al. Evaluation of second-generation supraglottic airway devices in emergency airway management: A multicenter observational study. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022; 63(4): 451–459.
ONO Y, et al. Should laryngeal tubes or masks be used for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients? The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2015; 33(10): 1360-1363.
SOAR J, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation, 2015; 95: 100-147.
SOS-KANTO Study Group. Comparison of arterial blood gases of laryngeal mask airway and bag-valve-mask ventilation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Circulation Journal. 2009;73(3):490–6.
THEILER L, et al. i-gel™ supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2012; 109(6): 990-995.
TRITSCH L, et al. Intubating laryngeal mask airway placement by non-physician healthcare providers in management out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a case series. Resuscitation, 2014; 85(3): 320-325.
WANG HE, et al. Time to advanced airway placement and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 2018; 128: 16–23.