Keywords
Medicine
Technology
How to Cite
Copyright © | All rights reserved.
The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.
Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.
Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.
Abstract
Objective: To perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Open Hospital software into Brazilian Portuguese, targeted at small and medium-sized hospitals. Methods: Development study conducted in three stages: 1) independent translation by two bilingual translators; 2) back-translation by two independent translators; and 3) evaluation by a multiprofessional committee composed of six experts (three physicians and three English language teachers). Semantic validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), employing an instrument adapted from the Suitability Assessment of Materials with 22 items distributed across six domains. Internal consistency was verified using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: The global CVI was 0.92. The domains "Illustrations and visual elements" and "Layout and presentation" obtained a CVI of 1.00, while "Content and semantic equivalence", "Stimulus for interaction", and "Cultural adequacy" presented a CVI of 0.83. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.82, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Sixty-eight suggestions were received from the experts, with an acceptance rate of 91.2%. Conclusion: The translated and adapted version of Open Hospital demonstrated high semantic validity and cultural adequacy to the Brazilian context, constituting a free and culturally appropriate technological alternative for hospital management in small and medium-sized hospitals in Brazil.
References
BARBALHO IMP, et al. Electronic health records in Brazil: prospects and technological challenges. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022; 10: 963841.
BENEVIDES JL, et al. Construção e validação de tecnologia assistiva para deficiente visual: um relato de experiência. Revista da Rede de Enfermagem do Nordeste, 2016; 17(1): 131-138.
BORSA JC, et al. Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paidéia, 2012; 22(53): 423-432.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Diretrizes metodológicas: elaboração de avaliação econômica de tecnologias em saúde. 2. ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2020.
CAETANO JA, et al. Validação de instrumento de avaliação de websites de saúde baseado em critérios de qualidade. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 2020; 28: e3291.
CELUPPI IC, et al. Dez anos do Prontuário Eletrônico do Cidadão e-SUS APS: em busca de um Sistema Único de Saúde eletrônico. Revista de Saúde Pública, 2024; 58: 23.
COSTA AP, et al. Avaliação de ferramentas de tradução automática para textos médicos: desafios e limitações. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 2019; 43(2): 145-153.
EPSTEIN J, et al. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015; 68(4): 435-441.
FRIEDMAN AJ, et al. Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations. Journal of Cancer Education, 2011; 26: 12-21.
HORSKY J, et al. Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2012; 45(6): 1202-1216.
JENAL S, ÉVORA YDM. Desafio da implantação do prontuário eletrônico do paciente. J. Health Inform., 2012; 4(Esp. SIIENF): 216-219.
LEITE ASS, et al. Construction and validation of an educational content validation instrument in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2018; 71: 1635-1641.
LILHOLT PH, et al. Development and validation of a web-based survey to measure health literacy in Danish patients with type 2 diabetes. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 2015; 4(1): e5.
LIMA ACMAPC, et al. Construção e validação de conteúdo de instrumento de coleta de dados para a consulta de enfermagem pré-natal. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 2017; 25: e2863.
LOURENÇO DF, et al. Tradução e adaptação transcultural da System Usability Scale para o português brasileiro. Aquichán, 2022; 22(2): e2228.
MELO RP, et al. Validação de cartilha educativa digital sobre ressuscitação cardiopulmonar. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2019; 72(4): 1015-1021.
NASCIMENTO JSG, et al. Methodological quality of validation of studies on simulated scenarios in nursing. Rev. Rene, 2021; 22: e62459.
OLIVEIRA DE, et al. Prontuário eletrônico do paciente: vantagens e desafios na implementação. Dissertação de Mestrado (Mestrado em Engenharia de Produção) – Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Paraná, 2021.
PASCOM ARP, et al. Sampling studies to estimate the HIV prevalence rate in female commercial sex workers. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010; 14: 385-397.
PASQUALI L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. 4. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009.
ROSENBLOOM ST, et al. Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006; 13(3): 277-288.
SANTOS ÉR, et al. A utilização do prontuário eletrônico: um relato de experiência pelo olhar de estudantes de medicina no interior do Amazonas. JMPHC – Journal of Management & Primary Health Care, 2022; 14: e003.
SECKMAN C. The relationship between usability and patient safety in health information technology. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2017; 35(6): 319-326.
SOUSA CS, et al. Tradução e adaptação do instrumento "Suitability Assessment of Materials" (SAM) para o português. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE On Line, 2015; 9(5): 7854-7861.
SOUSA VD, ROJJANASRIRAT W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2011; 17(2): 268-274.
TAVAKOL M, DENNICK R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2011; 2: 53-55.
TEIXEIRA E, NASCIMENTO MHM. Pesquisa metodológica: perspectivas operacionais e densidade participativa. In: TEIXEIRA E (Org.). Desenvolvimento de Tecnologias Cuidativo-Educacionais. v. II. Porto Alegre: Moriá, 2020.
TELES LMR, et al. Construção e validação de manual educativo para acompanhantes durante o trabalho de parto e parto. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 2014; 48(6): 977-984.
TOLEDO PPS, et al. Prontuário eletrônico: uma revisão sistemática de implementação sob as diretrizes da Política Nacional de Humanização. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2021; 26: 2131-2140.
WILD D, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health, 2005; 8(2): 94-104.
XAVIER ATF, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the neuropathy-and foot ulcer-specific quality of life instrument (NeuroQol) for Brazilian Portuguese-phase 1. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 2011; 19: 1352-1361.
ZERBINATO AV, BELLO DM. Prontuário eletrônico: fatores críticos de sucesso e falha para a implantação efetiva. Repositório Institucional UFF, 2019.
ZHANG J, WALJI MF. TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2011; 44(6): 1056-1067.