Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting in auricular reconstruction
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Maxillofacial prosthesis
Tissue engineering
Bioprinting
Rehabilitation

How to Cite

Tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting in auricular reconstruction. (2026). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 26(7), e24053. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e24053.2026

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To review the use of tissue engineering and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in ear reconstruction as an alternative for maxillofacial rehabilitation. Methods: This is a descriptive study conducted through an integrative literature review. A search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases using the descriptors “Bioprinting,” “Ear,” and “Cartilage,” combined with the Boolean operator “AND.” Applying a filter for the last five years, 28 articles in English were identified. After title and abstract screening, 21 studies were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria, such as review articles, in vitro studies, or studies unrelated to the topic. Therefore, 7 in vivo laboratory studies were included. Results: Tissue engineering associated with 3D bioprinting demonstrated potential for auricular reconstruction in patients with maxillofacial defects. Different biomaterials were used, including hydrogels combined with polyglycolic acid meshes containing chondrocytes, bacterial nanocellulose, and polycaprolactone. These materials showed good biomechanical properties, promoting cell proliferation and in vivo cartilage regeneration. Final considerations: 3D bioprinting enables the creation of personalized structures that reproduce the anatomy of the human ear, ensuring biocompatibility and satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. The association of biomaterials with hydrogels appears promising for future clinical applications in external ear reconstruction.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

References

ARIANI N, et al. Current status of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2013; 26(1): 57–67.

DE CAXIAS FP, et al. Classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prostheses. International Journal of Dentistry. 2019; 2019: 1–7.

DUBEY SG, et al. Materials in maxillofacial prosthetics: a review. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020; 9(44): 3319–3324.

GHAGAS SR, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life after prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with maxillofacial defects: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2025.

GVARAMIA D, et al. Evaluation of autologous bioprinted cartilage grafts in an immunocompetent rabbit model. Advanced Therapeutics. 2024; 7(6): 2300441.

HUANG Y, et al. Application and progress of tissue engineering and biomaterial scaffolds for total auricular reconstruction in microtia. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023; 11: 1089031.

IBRAHIM EA, et al. Scoping review on the potential of three-dimensional bioprinting in auricular cartilage regeneration. SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences. 2024; 15(3): 111–120.

JIA L, et al. Bioprinting and auricular cartilage regeneration using a microporous photocrosslinkable acellular cartilage matrix-based bioactive bioink. Bioactive Materials. 2022; 16: 66–81.

LANDAU S, et al. Human engineered auricular reconstruction (hEAR) using 3D-printed molds with human auricular and costal chondrocytes and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biofabrication. 2022; 14(1): 015010.

LANZARA R, et al. Maxillofacial prosthetic materials: current status and recent advances: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 2021; 7(2): 255–259.

LIU N, et al. 3D bioprinted scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration. Frontiers in Materials. 2022; 9: 925321.

OTTO IA, et al. Biofabrication of a shape-stable auricular structure for ear deformity reconstruction. Materials Today Bio. 2021; 9: 100094.

OTTO IA, et al. Adult, pediatric, and microtia auricular cartilage contains fibronectin-adherent progenitor cells with potential for regenerative ear reconstruction. iScience. 2022; 25(9): 104979.

SALAH M, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting and bone tissue engineering: technical innovations and potential applications in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2020; 42(1): 18.

UM JH, et al. 3D-printed scaffolds for ear reconstruction using decellularized human cartilage-derived bioink and polycaprolactone. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2025; 11(5): 2834–2845.

VELASQUILLO C, et al. Residual microtia tissue as a cell source for 3D bioprinted elastic cartilage constructs: potential use in surgical microtia reconstruction. Cell and Tissue Banking. 2023; 25(2): 571–582.

WEI J, et al. Bioengineered human tissue regeneration and repair using endogenous stem cells. Cell Reports Medicine. 2023; 4(8): 101156.

XIE X, et al. Microtissue-based bioink as a chondrocyte microshelter for DLP bioprinting. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2022; 11(22): 2201877.

ZENG J, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose-reinforced gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel improves biomechanical properties and glycosaminoglycan content of 3D bioprinted cartilage. International Journal of Bioprinting. 2022; 9(1): 631.

ZHOU J, et al. Recent advances in 3D bioprinted cartilage-mimicking constructs for tissue engineering applications. Materials Today Bio. 2023; 23: 100870.

ZIELINSKA D, et al. Combining bioengineered human skin with bioprinted cartilage for ear reconstruction. Science Advances. 2023; 40: eadh1890.