Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Comparative study about quality of life, overload and musculoskeletal symptoms in elderly caregivers
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Quality of life
Overload
Occupational health
Muscular diseases
Caregivers

How to Cite

Comparative study about quality of life, overload and musculoskeletal symptoms in elderly caregivers. (2020). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 12(3), e2933. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e2933.2020

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To compare Quality of Life, musculoskeletal symptoms and overloads in caregivers of the elderly. Methods: This is an epidemiological, observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and quantitative study, whose sample consisted of seventy-six individuals of both sexes, aged between 18 and 55 years, allocated in two groups, formal caregivers (Group A) and family caregivers (Group B). Data were collected with the WHOQOL-BREF, QNSO and EZBI questionnaires. Results: General Quality of Life (GQL) was higher in Group A than in B. Light overload was mostly concentrated in Group B and severe overload in Group A. In musculoskeletal symptoms, Group A suffered lumbar, dorsal and shoulder involvement. There were absences due to lumbar, dorsal and shoulder involvement. In Group B, there were lower back, shoulder and back injuries. There were no absences in this group, despite having been overloaded and being more exposed to musculoskeletal symptoms and lower QOL, maybe they performed their activities anonymously, without formal ties in the performance of their functions. Conclusion: Group A suffered less wear and tear, moving away from work activities, while Group B suffered more wear and tear, however with no absence from work.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))