Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Comparison between three coproparasitological techniques in the investigation of intestinal parasites in humans
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Supplementary Files

ERRATA (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Parasitological techniques
Parasitology
Helminth

How to Cite

Comparison between three coproparasitological techniques in the investigation of intestinal parasites in humans. (2020). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 52, e3521. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e3521.2020

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: This work aims to test and compare three coproparasitological techniques for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in humans. Methods: 141 analyzes of faecal samples from people of varying ages were carried out, using three methodologies: the method of Hoffman, Pons and Janer-adapted by Katagiri S and Oliveira-sequeira TCG (2007), the method of Willis-Mollay (1921) and the technique of Gordon and Whitlock-modified (or OPG). Results: he prevalence of helminthiasis using the Hoffman, Pons and Janer-adapted method was 14.18% (20), for the Willis-Mollay method it was 15.32% (19) and for the OPG technique it was 12 , 94% (15). Conclusion: The results showed that the Willis-Mollay method recovered a greater number of genera of instestinal parasites and proved to be faster and easier to perform. And with the realization of the three methodologies, it can be observed that the species of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura were the most prevalent in this study.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))