Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) as a combined prevention model: analysis of the epidemiological profile of users in a municipality in the state of Minas Gerais
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

HIV
Disease prevention
Post-exposure prophylaxis

How to Cite

Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) as a combined prevention model: analysis of the epidemiological profile of users in a municipality in the state of Minas Gerais. (2020). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 12(10), e5098. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e5098.2020

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the epidemiological profile of PEP users in a city in Minas Gerais. Methods: This is an analysis of the medical records of patients who used the PEP as a measure to prevent contamination after consensual sexual exposure in the specialized care service (SAE) in a city in Minas Gerais, from January 2015 to July 2017, considering the following variables as importance for the study: sex, marital status, occupation, education, use of drugs or alcohol, previous STD, sexual practice, knowledge about risk with the partner (serology). Results: The epidemiological profile verified corresponds to the prevalence of male users, totaling 75%, which corroborates the idea of ​​their tendency towards higher risk behaviors. Regarding marital status, an important predominance of “singles” was observed, leading to the conclusion that there is a relevant deficit in the use of barrier contraceptive methods. The risk of the partner was unknown by more than 90% of people, creating the hypothesis that the relationships were eventual. Conclusion: It is concluded that the participants of this study have inadequate knowledge about the benefits of prophylaxis, making it difficult to adhere to it, just as the epidemiological profile was traced.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))