Google Scholar | Citations: 16429| h-index: 32 | i10-index: 482
Epidemiological profile of patients with cholelithiasis seen in the surgical assessment
PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))

Supplementary Files

Certificado de publicação (Portuguese (Brazil))

Keywords

Cholelithiasis
Diagnosis
Gallbladder Diseases
Health Services Research

How to Cite

Epidemiological profile of patients with cholelithiasis seen in the surgical assessment. (2019). Electronic Journal Collection Health, 28, e947. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e947.2019

Copyright © | All rights reserved.

The journal holds the exclusive copyright for the publication of this article under the terms of Brazilian law 9610/98.

Partial reproduction
The use of parts of the texts, figures and questionnaire of the article is free, being mandatory the citation of the authors and journal.

Total reproduction
It is expressly prohibited and must be authorized by the journal.

Abstract

Objective: Identify the epidemiological profile of patients with calculous gallbladder diseases attended at an outpatient academic center. Methodology: A retrospective, quantitative and transversal study, with analysis of electronic records of all patients with gallstones in the period from August 2017 to August 2018 (number CAAE: 80563417.3.0000.5495). Results: Data from 235 patients were analyzed. 71, 4% women and 28, 6% were men. 31% were 60 years or older, 22% were between 50-59 years old, 21% were between 40-49 years old, 18% were between 30-39 years old, 7% were between 18-29 years old and 1% were under 18 years old. In relation to race, 76% were white, 7% were black and 17% were brown. Regarding BMI, 14% were in ideal weight range, 28% were overweight, 23% had grade I obesity, 20% grade II, 9% grade III and 6% were below the ideal weight range. In the analysis of the diabetes mellitus, 27% had both pathologies. In relation to pregnancy, 18% of women had only one, 26% two, 22% thres, 9% four and 25% more than five. Conclusion: the epidemiological data of cholelithiasis in this study was comparable with literature. In addition, most of risk factors pointed are modifiable, in other words, preventable.

PDF (Portuguese (Brazil))